Roma
Ok, I stand corrected then. I thought Roma loaned him to Empoli last year. I must be wrong.
Roma
I think we're buying more hype than quality
Rudiger has gone to Chelsea and supposedly is still error prone (but has great potential) and Schick is also an unproven youngster with great potential.If the plan is to spend in the region of another 130-140m on VVD and Keita, i'm beginning to wonder if its the best use of that kind of money.
Lets assume Coutinho is staying.
Instead of VVD and Keita we could have:
Kessie 28m
Paredes 23m
Schick 20m
Rudiger 35m
And still have money left over
So we're back to just trust the manager.
You're confident that there's no possible way of us being better by signing other players.
VVD sounds like he'll cost crazy money, which is a huge risk off the back of a medium term injury. I'd rather we looked elsewhere. I couldn't tell you who that would be though. My knowledge of European football is pretty shite.
Of course there are .... however identifying them and how successful they may be is a game of roulette that every club plays. However (over) paying, undoubtedly, but that's where the market is for PL clubs, for proven players mitigates the risk to an extent.But it seems obvious that there might be plenty of better deals out there
I agree.If the plan is to spend in the region of another 130-140m on VVD and Keita, i'm beginning to wonder if its the best use of that kind of money.
Lets assume Coutinho is staying.
Instead of VVD and Keita we could have:
Kessie 28m
Paredes 23m
Schick 20m
Rudiger 35m
And still have money left over
Of course there are .... however identifying them and how successful they may be is a game of roulette that every club plays. However (over) paying, undoubtedly, but that's where the market is for PL clubs, for proven players mitigates the risk to an extent.
Who was it who wrote something like this a while back..
I heard a really good description of Liverpool's transfer strategy today. "Target A too expensive, let's move onto target B. Target B, wages too high, let's move on to target C.
Hang on, target C isn't much better than what we have, & has a questionable injury record. Ah so what, they're new, we need new players, let's buy them anyway, Klopp can improve them. If it doesn't work out Milner can play there."
That would have been me.
I don't think it holds true that the more we pay the better chance we have of things panning out well. Intuitively it makes sense, but thats reliant on the players being worth what is paid.
Perhaps not, but as I said, we've done nothing but try your suggestion for years, & it's been pretty fucking disappointing, & we've managed to waste a shitload of cash on dross in the process.
So let's try it this way, see what happens. Yes, the fact they're the manager's number one choices is a big reason why, but our past history in transfers is a big part too.
I have concerns about van Dijk. I'm certain we can get better for a cheaper price.
Keita I'm more comfortable with. Instinctively think that he's going to be a special player. We're clearly getting shafted over the price, but if he's truly sensational, we won't care about the price.
Salah I'm very happy with. I'm very confident he'll be a success.
Left back, I hope we go for someone really good.
Unless I'm mistaken, all four of the players in the OP have moved clubs this summer, so it is more than a little pointless IMO comparing players we are seemingly interested in to players who are unavailable.
@Rosco if you think the club's current targets are folly, it'd be far more interesting to see your proposed list of alternatives we could actually sign, but then @redhorizon2 already did that thread.
Southampton had actually conceded less goals then us when he got injured.
If we are going to look at players that can be an alternative to VVD, it has to be someone who fits the same profile. Rudiger doesnt fit that imho.
Yeah you're correct. It was deliberate to show why i don't need to show you a list of alternatives.
Because just those 4 are a good example of how the money could have been arguably better used
Only possible if these guys were targets in the first place, no sign that they were. So there's no possible way that money that hasn't even been spent yet could have been better spent on players we were never going to sign. It's actually a very poor example of what you describe and nothing more than peddling impossible 'what ifs'. One of those players you listed is a striker (Schick) and it's pretty clear we are not even interested in signing another one.
You don't need to show a list of alternatives, no, but - in the real world - alternatives will only be seriously considered when it becomes clear that first choice targets aren't going to move. I hope the club's alternatives are better than yours, otherwise we'll be signing no more new players!
Yeah you're correct. It was deliberate to show why i don't need to show you a list of alternatives.
Because just those 4 are a good example of how the money could have been arguably better used
And if the only defender and midfielder he wants - IN THE ENTIRE WORLD - are Van Dijk and Keita, then fine yeah, let's sign fucking nobody at all!
Fucking retarded
And if the only defender and midfielder he wants - IN THE ENTIRE WORLD - are Van Dijk and Keita, then fine yeah, let's sign fucking nobody at all!
Fucking retarded
Come on man, you've said yourself across other threads that Gini and Mané were not first choice. He's shown that he will move on to other targets, but he's also shown that he has a limit to how far he'll drop in quality.
Van Dijk and Keita won't be the sole targets, but it looks like they are the top targets so we'll move on when we don't think there's a chance of signing them.