• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

How to spend this year's £100m

Status
Not open for further replies.

beejay

Very Active
Member
Not seen a thread on this yet but we spent over £100m last year and regressed and we are likely to have a similar "war chest" this year.

Aspas & Assaidi for £10m is already in the kitty and we will likely sell Sterling (£45m) ; Coates (£5m) ; Borini (£8m) ; Balotelli (£12m) ; Lambert (£3m). Plus we will have about £25m irrespective of sales. There are a few others who might go such as Enrique, maybe Lucas, Illori.

We have also taken some big wage earners off the payroll with Gerrard & Johnson leaving.

So where would you invest these funds in order to improve the team and our league position?

It's fundamental to me to build a side that has far greater control of games, we were outplayed by average sides way too much last year because we were too laboured in our build-up, coughed up possession cheaply and were not physical enough to hold up the play. Plus we barely tackled in midfield.

We lacked goals because we didn't create enough but also our strikers were shocking.

We have a great chance to address these weaknesses and it's not a bad start to be honest with Milner, Ings & Bogdan in the squad for very little outlay.

To me, we need 2 new starting full backs and a strong, athletic pivot in front of the back four to add some steel to the defence.

Next, we want better passing options in midfield and more goalscorers in this department.

Finally, we need one more guaranteed goalscoring striker who can also be involved in the link play.

Nominations?

On players we have been connected with, I like : Clyne (RB : £15m) ; Lucas Digne (LB : £10m) ; Nainggolan (DM : £20m) ; Illaramendi (CM : £18m) ; Kovacic (CM : £20m) ; Benteke (S : £30m).

I'm likely be accused of CM 2015 but that's the ambition I think we should have, we don't need a straight replacement for Sterling because we are well stocked with good wide players, we should use the cash to strengthen our weakest areas.
 
Very much doubt we'll have 100m to spend again this summer. If we did the best way to spend it would be getting someone else to spend it instead of rogers

;-)
 
Love the optimism.
Even if there was anything close to 100m this summer, it seems everything is going to the main stand
 
Let's buy premiership proven. Yeah. Great. Wait that hasn't worked.

Let's buy young emerging talent. From Europe. Brilliant. Wait that didn't work either.

Lets buy Two marquee players? Strikers? Wait we aren't in the CL? Can't attract them..

I've no clue how to move forward.
 
Let's buy young emerging talent. From Europe. Brilliant. Wait that didn't work either.

Coutinho's a clear success and Markovic deserves another season without being messed around by Rodgers before we judge him. He's shown enough potential and willing to be given a chance to nail down a position. I wouldn't suggest this policy has failed and should be abandoned. In fact I think it's totally the way to go.
 
Let's buy premiership proven. Yeah. Great. Wait that hasn't worked.

Let's buy young emerging talent. From Europe. Brilliant. Wait that didn't work either.

Lets buy Two marquee players? Strikers? Wait we aren't in the CL? Can't attract them..

I've no clue how to move forward.

I guess there's two questions that need to be asked, because the principles of buying young talent, Premiership proven and/or Marquee players isn't flawed.

1. Are we identifying the right players to sign?

2. Once signed, are the management & coaches making the best use of or developing the talent?

The answer to both these questions can't be yes and without more resources it probably needs to be in order to challenge the likes of City & Chelsea.

So if either or both are a no - then changes have to be made.

The follow on question is then, at what point is it decided that the process has stalled enough to warrant significant changes given that investment in younger players, which has been our primary focus, is something that can't be judged easily in the short term?
 
I don't think we necessarily have to buy a marquee player, we just need to stay away from putting £30m on the likes of Benteke, if we don't stay away from transfers like that, that then we really haven't learned the lessons of last Summer and past signings like Carroll.

I'd sooner see is buy a young exciting attacker from Portugal or Spain, wherever, someone on the rise who's already starting to make a name for themselves with goals and an edge. We need to buy quality, it doesn't have to be Premiership proven, big name, just the right player. The scouts and Rodgers need to start earning their crust, instead of overpaying on players worth probably half the value in real terms. We also need to stop paying over the odds for young players that there's little interest in, cf your Moreno's, Markovic's, Alberto's, etc.

Why go to Villa with £30m for someone like Benteke, when we could realistically get a bright young player from Europe for less than that? It doesn't make any sense at all, in terms of investment, cost and wages. It's an absolute no brainer.
 
It depends on what you're definition of a "marquee signing" is?

For me, it's not about expense, it's about quality - the expectation is that he'd be one of our best players.

I agree though, I don't think Benteke is a signing we should be making.
 
Spend it on players that will improve the first team, in positions we need strengthning so we dont have to play them half the season out of position.

That would be easier if our manager knew which direction he wanted his team to take tactically and which set up to go for next season.
 
I think there'll be a marquee signing.

FSG will know that 'Henderson' doesn't sell shirts.
 
Although he'd be perfect, I think it's fairly accepted that he's only leaving for an established Champions League club.

That may well be the case with Lacazette.

Generally though I'm not having this 'no Champions League, no big name signings' nonsense.
United signed Falcao and Di Maria...two major names without Champions League Football and whilst Falcao didn't work out and Di Maria hasn't really yet, they showed their intent. And how did they pull off these signings? Because they paid the £££.
I'm not saying we're able to do the same, but if you spend big on fees and/or wages and 'sell your vision' or whatever they call it, then you stand a good chance of attracting the big hitters. It's as simple as that really.
 
You're right of course, Gary, but that's just not how it's going to happen, so it's pointless getting any hopes up or even discussing it.
 
You're right of course, Gary, but that's just not how it's going to happen, so it's pointless getting any hopes up or even discussing it.

I'm just making the point mate. Think we all know by now that FSG are tightarses. Just hope people are realistic about our chances next season as a result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C/O
Lacazette will go to PSG or Real or some other big team in CL. Falcao and Dimaria were massive flops. Now they're talking about selling Dimaria for £45m which is a £15m loss and I can't remember the cost Falcao was for 1 season. The thing is with Austin and Ings is they have greater chance of scoring 30-40 goals between them then say a striker from continent who has to adapt to the premier league and the city.
 
Cutting to the chase here, if you're not in the CL, you need at least a CL quality manager to attract those players.

We don't have one. He was really poor in Europe, this past year.

This alone, was what convinced me that our great European club needs a new manager.
 
That may well be the case with Lacazette.

Generally though I'm not having this 'no Champions League, no big name signings' nonsense.
United signed Falcao and Di Maria...two major names without Champions League Football and whilst Falcao didn't work out and Di Maria hasn't really yet, they showed their intent. And how did they pull off these signings? Because they paid the £££.
I'm not saying we're able to do the same, but if you spend big on fees and/or wages and 'sell your vision' or whatever they call it, then you stand a good chance of attracting the big hitters. It's as simple as that really.

Utd are not a good example.

Any player will be aware of their recent history and know that any absence from the CL will be temporary. No one is that confident when it comes to us - if we're not convinced by the project (and we really want to be), why would a top player?
 
I think the key word is established...

Over the last 5 years we have established ourselves well outside the Champions League.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom