• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Darwin Nunez

Status
Not open for further replies.
The wage difference isn’t likely to be that significant here - reports suggest €6m net per annum for Darwin, which equates to £185k per week - Mane probably isn’t on much more than that at present. The wage “saving” here is what Darwin will earn relative to what Mane was asking for (reported £400k). But that just preserves some of this year’s transfer budget, it doesn’t add to it.
The amortisation of the transfer fee isn’t relevant here - the key driver is available cash, not profit. I’m not aware that we have any issues with profit for FFP and the sale of Mane would probably address those anyway.

We agree on the wages comment was based on Manés next contract, which FSG must have had some increase budget for.

On the cash side, I don’t think that is the key. FSG have never had a cash issue and being compliant with FFP has not been issue, except they others to do so as well.

But, they don’t try to just be compliant, they want to run a profitable business and amortization is relevant to that.

In fairness, Cash Flow and P&L are both critical and intertwined.
 
We agree on the wages comment was based on Manés next contract, which FSG must have had some increase budget for.

On the cash side, I don’t think that is the key. FSG have never had a cash issue and being compliant with FFP has not been issue, except they others to do so as well.

But, they don’t try to just be compliant, they want to run a profitable business and amortization is relevant to that.

In fairness, Cash Flow and P&L are both critical and intertwined.

Business owners don't give a shit about amortisation other than the arbitrary effect on the accounts - e.g. on profits therefore on share price etc. Even then the market is gonna tend to discount the effect. We're privately owned so that's even more true.

Amortisation is literally just a way to reflect the cost in the accounts in a somewhat more realistic way than just deducting the cash. On its own it drives virtually no actual business decisions.
 
United's hierarchy see the signing as ‘reckless spending’
[article]
Manchester United Believe Liverpool Are Making A Mistake In Signing Darwin Nunez


Gabriel Tann

Published 18:19, 13 June 2022 BST
| Last updated 18:38, 13 June 2022 BST
resize

Manchester United believe their rivals Liverpool are making a mistake by signing Benfica forward Darwin Nunez, according to reports.
With Liverpool set to announce the €100m signing in the coming days, United's hierarchy see the signing as ‘reckless spending’ – a somewhat ironic statement considering United have been guilty of doing exactly that in the past.
The Red Devils were seemingly in the race for the Uruguayan’s signature at one point, but they pulled out in fear of being drawn into an expensive bidding war, according to ESPN.

Signings such as Alexis Sanchez, Paul Pogba, Harry Maguire and Romelu Lukaku have come at a high cost for United, with all four players being transferred in on a high fee and wage.
Subsequently, the stints all four players had at United have been deemed as failures by the majority, with the fees paid not being represented on the pitch.
These past failures in the transfer market by United should come as a warning for Liverpool and their pursuit of Nunez, with it displaying how a high fee doesn’t always translate to high class performances.
resize

Image credit: Alamy

The eye-watering €100m fee Liverpool are prepared to pay for Darwin Nunez has many questioning Liverpool’s transfer strategy this summer.
However, of late, Liverpool have seemingly got these big transfers right under Klopp.
[/article]
 
United's hierarchy see the signing as ‘reckless spending’
[article]
Manchester United Believe Liverpool Are Making A Mistake In Signing Darwin Nunez


Gabriel Tann

Published 18:19, 13 June 2022 BST
| Last updated 18:38, 13 June 2022 BST
resize

Manchester United believe their rivals Liverpool are making a mistake by signing Benfica forward Darwin Nunez, according to reports.
With Liverpool set to announce the €100m signing in the coming days, United's hierarchy see the signing as ‘reckless spending’ – a somewhat ironic statement considering United have been guilty of doing exactly that in the past.
The Red Devils were seemingly in the race for the Uruguayan’s signature at one point, but they pulled out in fear of being drawn into an expensive bidding war, according to ESPN.

Signings such as Alexis Sanchez, Paul Pogba, Harry Maguire and Romelu Lukaku have come at a high cost for United, with all four players being transferred in on a high fee and wage.
Subsequently, the stints all four players had at United have been deemed as failures by the majority, with the fees paid not being represented on the pitch.
These past failures in the transfer market by United should come as a warning for Liverpool and their pursuit of Nunez, with it displaying how a high fee doesn’t always translate to high class performances.
resize

Image credit: Alamy

The eye-watering €100m fee Liverpool are prepared to pay for Darwin Nunez has many questioning Liverpool’s transfer strategy this summer.
However, of late, Liverpool have seemingly got these big transfers right under Klopp.
[/article]

ironic - Fuck wits !
 
United's hierarchy see the signing as ‘reckless spending’
[article]
Manchester United Believe Liverpool Are Making A Mistake In Signing Darwin Nunez


Gabriel Tann

Published 18:19, 13 June 2022 BST
| Last updated 18:38, 13 June 2022 BST
resize

Manchester United believe their rivals Liverpool are making a mistake by signing Benfica forward Darwin Nunez, according to reports.
With Liverpool set to announce the €100m signing in the coming days, United's hierarchy see the signing as ‘reckless spending’ – a somewhat ironic statement considering United have been guilty of doing exactly that in the past.
The Red Devils were seemingly in the race for the Uruguayan’s signature at one point, but they pulled out in fear of being drawn into an expensive bidding war, according to ESPN.

Signings such as Alexis Sanchez, Paul Pogba, Harry Maguire and Romelu Lukaku have come at a high cost for United, with all four players being transferred in on a high fee and wage.
Subsequently, the stints all four players had at United have been deemed as failures by the majority, with the fees paid not being represented on the pitch.
These past failures in the transfer market by United should come as a warning for Liverpool and their pursuit of Nunez, with it displaying how a high fee doesn’t always translate to high class performances.
resize

Image credit: Alamy

The eye-watering €100m fee Liverpool are prepared to pay for Darwin Nunez has many questioning Liverpool’s transfer strategy this summer.
However, of late, Liverpool have seemingly got these big transfers right under Klopp.
[/article]
Bit of a nothing article with no quotes or names.
 
We agree on the wages comment was based on Manés next contract, which FSG must have had some increase budget for.

On the cash side, I don’t think that is the key. FSG have never had a cash issue and being compliant with FFP has not been issue, except they others to do so as well.

But, they don’t try to just be compliant, they want to run a profitable business and amortization is relevant to that.

In fairness, Cash Flow and P&L are both critical and intertwined.
FSG manage based on cash. They have done throughout their ownership period. I know this from people who work for the club and the accounts support it. This is responsible ownership.
Failure to pay attention to cash is why Leeds went bust and why the Blue Shite and Farcelona are in such a mess right now.
 
Be good if he kicked on like Salah did. Can't overly see it, but hopefully i'm wrong again
 
Be good if he kicked on like Salah did. Can't overly see it, but hopefully i'm wrong again
I don't know why people think he wouldn't kick on under Klopp. I mean, that's what he does, helps players play to their absolute maximum level. I remember the massive skepticism across the site when we signed Salah, and especially prevalent were both that he wasn't good enough, and he wasn't the kind of player we needed. Well, that turned out alright. I know the "in Klopp we trust" mantra might seem like unthinking faith, but he and his team have repeatedly got this stuff right, and Klopp has repeatedly made players better throughout his entire coaching career. I'm so delighted with this signing. Fuck yer Haaland, Darwin's going to kick arse.
 
I don't know why people think he wouldn't kick on under Klopp. I mean, that's what he does, helps players play to their absolute maximum level. I remember the massive skepticism across the site when we signed Salah, and especially prevalent were both that he wasn't good enough, and he wasn't the kind of player we needed. Well, that turned out alright. I know the "in Klopp we trust" mantra might seem like unthinking faith, but he and his team have repeatedly got this stuff right, and Klopp has repeatedly made players better throughout his entire coaching career. I'm so delighted with this signing. Fuck yer Haaland, Darwin's going to kick arse.
Oh i've no doubt if anyone can do it klopp can. My overall pessimism is whats making me hope rather than know.
 
It's not just klopp. Forward players enjoy playing in our team if they'll work off the ball. Forwards enjoy our delivery. Midfielders that like to be creative in the final third struggle.
 
#YNWA about how we're entitled to spend money. What the fuck does that even mean? Who are we justifying ourselves to?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom