Jurgen Klopp is about to unleash Robert Lewandowski plan at Liverpool after £85m change
[article]A step into the unknown for the Reds boss? Perhaps. But only in terms of his Anfield reign. After all, he knows how to get the best from an out-and-out striker. Just ask Robert Lewandowski, who spent four years working under Klopp at Borussia Dortmund.
"He released that striker's instinct in me,” the Poland international once said. “I didn’t know that I still had so much potential inside of me. He saw something in me that I couldn’t see.
"He taught me so much. When I arrived at Dortmund, I wanted to do everything quickly: strong pass, one touch only. Jurgen showed me to calm down – to take two touches if necessary. It was totally against my nature, but soon I was scoring more goals.
“When I had that down, he challenged me to speed it up again. One touch, bang, goal. He slowed me down to speed me up. It sounds simple, but it was genius, really.”
Lewandowski scored just nine goals in his first season at Dortmund. His next three saw 94, highlighting the reward of Klopp's advice. And while the Liverpool boss will hope not have to work so hard at extracting top form from Nunez, nobody should be concerned at the forthcoming shift in attacking emphasis at Anfield.[/article]
The wind up merchant strikes againHe’s bang average
He’s bang average
I'd estimated previously that we had a budget for something like £90m headline fees this summer. If the reports are true, the headline fee for Nunez is about £65m. I'm assuming the add-ons won't be triggered in the coming season, even though there seems to be a sense that they are likely to be paid out over the course of the contract. We'll need to see what those add-ons are but if they are based on goals / appearances / Champions League qualification / trophy wins then they may not be due until this time next year at the earliest (goal / appearance fees are often due in batches of 25 / 50 rather than due every time the player plays / scores.
If we sell Mane for a headline £40m then that would leave approx. £65m left to spend, plus any proceeds of other deals. Obviously if the Mane deal if partly based on achievable contingent fees then we should probably discount those.
The mix of wages / timing of contingent fees will always throw some variability into the equation, but that suggests that we probably won't do another big deal, unless we raise some funds by clearing fringe players first (Neco / Taki / Ox seeming most likely at present). By all accounts, selling Ox would also make a big dent in the wage budget, although I wouldn't be surprised if we end up paying him to leave - i.e. even if we get a transfer fee, we could end up paying part of his wages for the remainder of his contract. That's pretty common when a player is on big wages and comes with injury risk (or is just over-paid for what he's really worth).
Obviously this is my best guess, and if I'm wrong and we end up spending big money on the right players then I'll be happy to be wrong.
One Hal is already more than enough.The wind up merchant strikes again
Jude Bellingham is a smokescreen for Jobe Bellingham….
His Ma is an average bangYer ma is bang average.
Or Lynda Bellingham.. 'ahhhh bisto' *points to the sky like fat frank*Or Natasha Bedingfield.
May explain why I’m bang averageYer ma is bang average.
Love it. We’re so lucky to have Klopp.
His Ma is an average bang
It’ll be third or fourth one.Well you’ll find out what a banging from YerMa’s like tomorrow!!!!
The wage difference isn’t likely to be that significant here - reports suggest €6m net per annum for Darwin, which equates to £185k per week - Mane probably isn’t on much more than that at present. The wage “saving” here is what Darwin will earn relative to what Mane was asking for (reported £400k). But that just preserves some of this year’s transfer budget, it doesn’t add to it.I think we are missing a couple of elements here. The big ones are wages and contract length. I think we forget that signing young players means lower wages than those they replace (except for Haaland and Mbappe - a big reason we did not go for them).
Darwin’s contract will be for 6 years, which means that the transfer fee will be amortized over that 6 years. Secondly, his wages are not that high, compared with other big players in the market (eg Haaland- who is much more expensive combining transfer and wages) or the cost of renewing Mané.
Even if we got zero for Mané, if we renewed Mané for 6 years at going rate for a world-class striker (~300K/per week) - not that we would give him a 6 year contract, but everything needs to be considered on an annualized basis. The wage difference alone pays the transfer fee. Any sales from Mané are a bonus.
Yeah as there is a Win in Darwin and shortened Darling in it as wellYes, I think we should all start with Darwin and see if it changes over time.
Spoken like someone who follows the SCM Xpert Eleven league.Yer ma is bang average.
Spoken like someone who follows the SCM Xpert Eleven league.