I agree with this. I'm not all that upset. It's clear that in Mane, Salah, Firmino and Lallana we have some great options up there.We still have some really good players, one or two of whom could well progress further by having greater freedom to express themselves now that the Little Mercenary has gone. And we might well sign another top player.
Pity really but what are ya gonna do. 142m is a lot of smackeroos
Wonder if we will finally spend the money on a keeper, a DM and a striker
Pity really but what are ya gonna do. 142m is a lot of smackeroos
Wonder if we will finally spend the money on a keeper, a DM and a striker
I don't think he's irreplaceable. He's a magnificent footballer but this is one where the TEAM might be better off.It may well be lots but is it enough to buy a replacement who had the same impact.
And is a replacement we should be using the money for
Someone had to come up with the balancing the books argument. Its a poor one and obviously wrong though.
1) we offered Coutinho improved terms to stay beyond January. Even though he only recently signed a new contract.
2) We'll spend the money coming in on replacements.
Clearly the signs of balancing the books. FSG agenda, Its a shite argument as usual.
I'm not trying to down play it. Sucks to lose him but 142m is fucking crazy. What did we get Salah for? Let's just do that three more times with the money.We've spent half of the money already.
And while I would love us to sign a keeper, DM and Striker, we now also have to sign a Coutinho replacement, because we don't have a player who can replace him at the moment. Although I expect someone will say something hilarious like Lallana, Chamberlain or Woodburn
Whilst I do share your cynicism over this, I imagine the reason he stayed in the summer and the reason he left now is down solely to the fee. They're offering a good £30million more than the summer, which took it to a price we deemed acceptable.Oh wait, I can explain it. We've just spent £75m on VVD and the books need to be balanced.
Silly me
Although I'm sure some cunt will try and pretend that we made him stay in summer in the hope that we could persuade him to ignore Barca's overtures, but after a few months we realised it wasn't possible and so just gave in
Not sure it makes us look bad, although digging our heels in so publically and loudly in summer, only to sell him 5 months later is very fucking weird
We've spent half of the money already.
.... Although I expect someone will say something hilarious like Lallana, Chamberlain or Woodburn
I agree. He wants to go he can go. We got good money for him. The next bits the important bit.Do people actually think the club could have forced this cry baby to stay until the summer? Because it DID try. So do some on here think something else could have been done? He was playing for a January move, his attitude stinks more generally than that, and him and his entourage clearly didn't just shut everything down for the season when we blocked the move in the summer. Some on here seem to be convinced the club only had to say 'no' and the player would have played on with a great positive spirit. It's childishly naive.
Do people actually think the club could have forced this cry baby to stay until the summer? Because it DID try. So do some on here think something else could have been done? He was playing for a January move, his attitude stinks more generally than that, and him and his entourage clearly didn't just shut everything down for the season when we blocked the move in the summer. Some on here seem to be convinced the club only had to say 'no' and the player would have played on with a great positive spirit. It's childishly naive.
Indeed. Can anyone explain it? We just look like twats now
And banked further champions league fundsNot really. They offered 80 million with ridiculous add-ons including winning the Eurovision song contest making up the rest of a 100m fee. We've made much more money and given ourselves more time to sound out replacements.
The consensus in the press is that it's £105million upfront, and then installments and realistic add ons make up the rest.Can we stop quoting the fee as £142 Million as we are never getting any of that add on Money are we. It's £106 million and Barca have bummed us again. Catalan twats
HahahahaI’ve unfollowed him on Instagram. That’ll teach the wee cunt a lesson he won’t forget in a hurry.
Yeah. We dug our heels in about Coutinho in summer, he wasn't for sale at any price, and we wouldn't negotiate.
Then, 5 months later, with no replacement lined up, and in a transfer window that traditionally isn't ideal for long-term planning, we miraculously agree to selling hi after all, just days after we spend 75m on a Van Dijk.
What a fucking coincidence! You gullible cretin
I've never seen add ons for any player that are realistic. It"s usually a tactic used by the selling club to justify the sale to their supporters. They say look how much we'll get when reality is quite different.The consensus in the press is that it's £105million upfront, and then installments and realistic add ons make up the rest.
I think the simplest explanation is probably the correct one - Barca did not offer enough in the summer and when they finally did come close to the amout FSG had in mind, it was literally in the last few days of the window, when we had no chance to secure a replacement. Didn't all of you say at the time that we no matter what we absolutely shouldn't let Coutinho go so late in the window? Well, you were right and that's why we refused to sell. This time Barcelona learned their lesson, didn't waste time low-balling and as soon as the window opened submitted a bid that was significantly more than their final bid in the summer. There is no mystery to why we didn't accept then and accepted now; unless you just want to whine about it.
He's making a valid point. Rein it in would you and let decent discussion proceed without ruining the place.