• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Club up for sale

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ballmer has thrown a ton of money at the Clippers and they're no closer to winning the title.

That is the concern I have about Ballmer. In his interviews, he talks about analytics, intelligence-based decision making but his track record at the Clippers is a bit underwhelming.

I guess under the previous ownership, the Clippers were the joke organization in LA. under Ballmer, they have become legit, and that is completely due to the money he has thrown at them. He gets credit for that.
 
Ballmer has thrown a ton of money at the Clippers and they're no closer to winning the title.

Yes, but they're a legit contender year after year now. Previously they were one of the laughing stocks of the league. Lots of rethinking of how to build an NBA team these days with the recent implosions of the Nets and Lakers and the injury-driven failure of the Clips.
 
It is a bit strange though. Chelsea go up for sale and there's umpteen competing bidders. The most storied club in the league, and one of the most iconic in world football, with a global fanbase to rival any, are apparently up for sale and everyone's excusing themselves from the table.
 
But that's only because they all think we're a ladyboy
That was proven a few years ago, when our Adam's apple was spotted

CzBP99eW8AArZkg
 
It is a bit strange though. Chelsea go up for sale and there's umpteen competing bidders. The most storied club in the league, and one of the most iconic in world football, with a global fanbase to rival any, are apparently up for sale and everyone's excusing themselves from the table.

It is… I assume being London based helps.
 
It is a bit strange though. Chelsea go up for sale and there's umpteen competing bidders. The most storied club in the league, and one of the most iconic in world football, with a global fanbase to rival any, are apparently up for sale and everyone's excusing themselves from the table.

The main difference is - there was a time limit on the Chelsea sale, it was a full club sale and it had to happen.

There is no time limit to our sale and it isn’t even a certainty.

I think it’s also an example of the way FSG like to conduct business - quietly and in the background.
 
It is… I assume being London based helps.

Also, interest rates were low in spring and early summer, and cash was cheap, at least in the US. Now interest rates have been hiked. Loans are significantly more expensive.
 
Informative thread. Harris & Blitzer appear to be one of the serious suitors - they're the owners of the Philadelphia 76ers, and also have a minority stake in Crystal Palace. Were one of the bidders for Chelsea as well.

 
A quick Google suggests they're in the same wealth bracket as FSG so wouldn't really be able to give us a leg up.
 
It is a bit strange though. Chelsea go up for sale and there's umpteen competing bidders. The most storied club in the league, and one of the most iconic in world football, with a global fanbase to rival any, are apparently up for sale and everyone's excusing themselves from the table.
Probably because FSG will not sell to any state backed institutions, or over seas middle Eastern places. The Qataris would love to own us, but we won't sell, because we are supporters built on high morals.
 
A quick Google suggests they're in the same wealth bracket as FSG so wouldn't really be able to give us a leg up.

Although, with no major capital projects talon the horizon, and that work completed - the club will retain a large part of its value, meaning, with a little bit less risk aversion, funds might be more forthcoming for transfers.

It’s not like we need to spend additional billions - a few hundred million and we’d be golden - if we can increase the amount of players we can sell for decent fees, we can make increased transfer activity sustainable.
 
The chance of getting better owners than FSG seems low. Which team in the Premier League would you swap owners with? Your choice is between profit driven capitalists and whitewashing sovereign funds. FSG are the former, but so are the Glazers, Hicks and Gillette, etc. Best case scenario is FSG sells a stake and retains majority. Actually, the best case scenario would be if the fans bought the club. Sell shares at £1000 a piece, would only need to sell 4 million of them, easy peasy.
 
Who knows whats happening behind the scenes? It seems there's NDA, which blocks any official announcements
 
Fuck this, I want the same shit as man city now. Don't give a fuck, FSG are good owners but so are man city owners for man city. What's the big deal, and don't give me any moral arguments. We are a club, if our nation state owner did anything bad then we would be sold like Chelsea, as long as we got klopp we will be OK.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom