Biden was definitely wrong in what he said, but I don't really have much time for him or Trump, especially when they're talking about public health. They're more about point scoring than anything else
Biden was definitely wrong in what he said, but I don't really have much time for him or Trump, especially when they're talking about public health. They're more about point scoring than anything else
Politics in general that now, isn't it?
My point being, you can tell there's an agenda when he isn't being fact-checked for something so patently and equally wrong on the opposite side of all those other censures.
The responses are only pro-Biden or anti-Biden, people are on a particular side and won't budge regardless. I just ignore what he or Trump says as much as possible, its rhetoric. Fauci is worth putting more time into listening to, not saying he's been great, but when you see the context of what he says, he tends to be more correct.
I can't trust Fauci after seeing him squirm in front of Rand Paul and the Senate. He just seems so full of shit. Obviously, he has more science and expertise to back up his points, but he seems all over the map, too, changing his stance every couple of months and then claiming the science changed. He also proclaimed to be The Science, himself. I think he's a psychopath who's enjoying the limelight, while also trying to dig himself out of a hole he has a huge hand of putting us all in.
All of those lack context.
For example the Pfizer quote I think you're talking about was a trial in South Africa where the Beta variant was active at the time, which showed it was 100% effective. Which turned out to be true in the real world too, it's no longer about.
Fauci was talking about the massively reduced risk of transmitting once vaccinated in May last year, just before Delta took off, and he said "effectively".
Things changed a lot with new variants and changing behaviours, just because something isn't true now, doesn't mean it wasn't true when said, especially when you give all the context around it.
Yeah, he is definitely more accurate and more qualified to comment. But he's caught in the political storm too. Egos and agendas. It's a cluster fuck.
Seems I was too optimistic earlier when I said 6 months. There's already a new variant in France. EVERYONE PANIC!!!
The fourth dose was gifted to mankind by the grace of our lord, now behold the consequence of your heresy and refusing the booster. It's still not too late my child, accept the lord's gift into your body and you shall be saved.
Yeah, maybe. I think it's getting close to a stage where too many people need to be coordinated and agreed on this, which just makes it less likely. I think it's much more likely that ivermectin just isn't the answer.
It possibly isn't but I don't think I've seen any major publications release full trial results. I've seen BBC debunk Ivermectin but their "study" on it was essentially run by a couple of students and was extremely light on detail. We have seen loads of people calling it horse medicine and not so many saying that it's actually a medicine that millions of people use every year. I might be cynical but you know the like of Pfizer don't want any drug that can help that's already available and cheap. If their main goal was to help end the pandemic they'd be for the Trips waiver.
With the vaccine, with mass testing and with the knowledge of how to prevent and treat this virus, I think the pandemic will end in 2021,” Varadkar said.
Yeah, hard to disagree.
I've said a few times that I don't trust any major global companies to do what's right, just to do what's in their interests. And I don't think Pzifer have anything to gain from not prolonging this, other than at some point they'll be found out, or someone else will solve for it. I just find it hard to buy that, essentially no medics, have actually said we're doing anything too far from the right thing. There's the occasional unverifiable group, like the Canadian one recently, but there's large holes in what they're saying too. I think it's all a total cluster fuck, and I think it'll be years before we actually know what's going on for sure.
I'd be fairly sure there's truth in a few of the conspiracy theories, but given there's thousands of conflicting ones, that should be a given.
On here ? Definitely Frogfish and I'm guessing the usual suspects like Hansern and Stevie who are just too dumb to do anything but repeat shite from "reliable sources".
In the world, the people who financed and caused the outbreak denied the lab leak theory. And all the scientific journals followed suit by publishing articles supporting their cover up.