• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?

Forums Unread posts
Is anyone getting their booster jabs? I don't really see why I need one

I'm also pissed than from 1 February I will need one to travel and don't like being backed into a corner when it doesn't feel necessary

The idea of older people getting boosters I'm fully behind, the science seems to say it helps, but I'm at a loss why the extra shots aren't being sent to poorer countries where rates are much higher
 
bdak33sxlk481.jpg


Another bit of excellent fact checking. I can't believe some of you retards fall for this.
 
SummerOnions said:
Is anyone getting their booster jabs? I don't really see why I need one

I'm also pissed than from 1 February I will need one to travel and don't like being backed into a corner when it doesn't feel necessary

The idea of older people getting boosters I'm fully behind, the science seems to say it helps, but I'm at a loss why the extra shots aren't being sent to poorer countries where rates are much higher
Click to expand...

What science says a booster is needed ?

I've seen opinions , no science.
 
SummerOnions said:
I saw this that they were testing from Iceland that seems quite revealing to a degree
a71570544b449bc916112d4caf950d43.jpg
Click to expand...

The very obvious problem there is if someone has a serious reaction to the vaccine it's usually quite soon after the vaccine.

So that's counted as an unvaccinated hospital admission. If they were separated the data might have integrity.


But also let's not forget this is a man made pandemic that was predicted by the Simpsons, as most world events have been.

 
Rosco said:
The very obvious problem there is if someone has a serious reaction to the vaccine it's usually quite soon after the vaccine.

So that's counted as an unvaccinated hospital admission. If they were separated the data might have integrity.


But also let's not forget this is a man made pandemic that was predicted by the Simpsons, as most world events have been.

Click to expand...
That's a tiny % and should be an outlier, right? Can't imagine seeing that in the trends

Also yeah Simpsons did it
 
Brizzle said:
TL;DR seems to be: Spreads quicker, symptoms are milder (almost significantly so). This is good.
Click to expand...

Yeah, same as the video I put in the other day.

Unfortunately, that doesn't help the lizards, and all this talk of positivity seems suspiciously absent in mainstream media. So, I'm not holding my breath on this being the beginning of the end, although it should be.
 
Halmeister said:
Click to expand...


Its a 140 now so he’s a bit behind. But he didnt mention that because nearly all of them are young and healthy FHI are still quite reluctant to draw any conclusions about the mild to moderate symptoms.

The latest report from South Africa is that Omicron is more infectious for kids, and they’ve seen a rise in hospital admissions in the young age groups.
Dont think thats been verified yet though.
 
Hansern said:
Its a 140 now so he’s a bit behind. But he didnt mention that because nearly all of them are young and healthy FHI are still quite reluctant to draw any conclusions about the mild to moderate symptoms.

The latest report from South Africa is that Omicron is more infectious for kids, and they’ve seen a rise in hospital admissions in the young age groups.
Dont think thats been verified yet though.
Click to expand...

There we go. That's what we'll hear from the lizards to justify more restrictions.

Are those hospitalisations due to covid or incidental positive tests? That's another thing these pricks like to conveniently leave out.
 
Halmeister said:
There we go. That's what we'll hear from the lizards to justify more restrictions.

Are those hospitalisations due to covid or incidental positive tests? That's another thing these pricks like to conveniently leave out.
Click to expand...

I've got no idea. Just heard it on the radio yesterday, but I dont think its been confirmed anywhere yet.
Not seen anything in regards to the same in Norway.

With the numbers we have currently, and its more Delta than Omicron at the moment, I'm expecting more restrictions in the coming weeks.
Cases have never been as high as now, new record per day the last few days. Its crazy at the moment.
 
I don't understand why the lizards want to impose controls when it means we're not going to the office which means companies are downsizing on their office space etc. The economy isn't being helped with all of this.
 
Athens said:
I don't understand why the lizards want to impose controls when it means we're not going to the office which means companies are downsizing on their office space etc. The economy isn't being helped with all of this.
Click to expand...

Big tech, big pharma, the likes of Amazon etc are profiting massively, and they're the ones that lobby for policy and hold sway over governments. Governmental officials benefit from kickbacks and the added control that a struggling, dependent, fearful population yields.
 
Halmeister said:
Big tech, big pharma, the likes of Amazon etc are profiting massively, and they're the ones that lobby for policy and hold sway over governments. Governmental officials benefit from kickbacks and the added control that a struggling, dependent, fearful population yields.
Click to expand...
Are they up against the property owners and the petrol companies with fewer people commuting to the office?
 
Athens said:
I don't understand why the lizards want to impose controls when it means we're not going to the office which means companies are downsizing on their office space etc. The economy isn't being helped with all of this.
Click to expand...

The lizards you refer to are the ones in the federal reserve. They now own the testicles of whatever government the stupid people feel like electing. They can do what they like, and if the economy reacts to their doings, they can turn it off with a lockdown. I did tell you this almost two years ago. Alas it has come to pass and you should work on explaining what you've done to your children, who have every right to hate your woke guts when they pay the price.
 
Athens said:
Are they up against the property owners and the petrol companies with fewer people commuting to the office?
Click to expand...

Big tech, big pharma etc are an economy of their own, and their dollars matter much more. The oil companies are the one, yeah, but those evil cunts have probably found a way to benefit from all of this
 
If you look at the global corporations the central bankers used to work with and for, where their networks and interests lie, the doom will reveal itself to you.
 
Halmeister said:
Big tech, big pharma etc are an economy of their own, and their dollars matter much more. The oil companies are the one, yeah, but those evil cunts have probably found a way to benefit from all of this
Click to expand...

They are your new overlords. You can't elect them. You can't boycott them. You can't afford to compete with them. You can't shop at their non existent competitors. You will just slowly liquidate all your assets and give them the proceeds. When you have no assets left to give, I suspect they will kill you all.
 
dantes said:
Damn, but for the question mark, that could have netted you a tidy amount of social credits.
Click to expand...

Do you get social credit for pointing out utter bullshit.

Seems like a good deal.

Target rich environment.
 
So in a not very surprising turn of events for the people with above average IQs, do you know what the Facebook fact check (researched by Reuters) have argued in Court ?

Their fact check is not a statement of fact, but just an opinion being asserted.

Facebook-fact-check-is-simply-opinion-Screenshot-2021-12-09.png
 
It reminds me of that scene in V for Vendetta when Stephen Fry mocks the party leader in a shit comedy skit. In fact, the similarities are striking. RIP Trevor, I guess.
 
Rosco said:
So in a not very surprising turn of events for the people with above average IQs, do you know what the Facebook fact check (researched by Reuters) have argued in Court ?

Their fact check is not a statement of fact, but just an opinion being asserted.

View attachment 2066
Click to expand...

They hired Snopes first, and the dude who owned it was made up and agreed to just say whatever they wanted for the Facebook dollar, but his managing editor Brooke Binkowski blew it up. She got fired, Snopes lost the contract, no-one talked about it
 
Halmeister said:
It reminds me of that scene in V for Vendetta when Stephen Fry mocks the party leader in a shit comedy skit. In fact, the similarities are striking. RIP Trevor, I guess.
Click to expand...

But I just did a quick Twitter search and no-one is arsed. Can't possibly be Russell Brand chatting shit can it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom