According to a report today there are as many hospitalizations from Omicron as Delta in Denmark.
From or with? And how many is that?
According to a report today there are as many hospitalizations from Omicron as Delta in Denmark.
I'm sorry but the media is in definite overdrive to make this out to be catastrophic again. And I don't believe a fucking word of it.
Here's Fauci admitting it is possible that a vaccine makes things worse.....
Trust the science
From or with? And how many is that?
So, going by that data, there are 1,840 cases of Omicron in Denmark. 21 are in hospital. That's a ratio of greater than 1% chance of being hospitalised. That's more than high enough to declare panic stations. Welcome back to Groundhog Day. And in 6 months, when the next variant hits, it'll be the same again.
The from/with thing for deaths is a misnomer, there's a quick way of tallying the numbers, which they use a recent positive test for, and then there's actually death certs which takes everything into account. Both numbers end up roughly the same. Death certs can take a long time to become official, which isn't useful when you need data quickly.
Hospitalisations are different, but actually it won't matter hugely whether it's what put them in the first place, or what's keeping them in, or just incidental. If you keep measuring it the same way, and if Omnicom is less dangerous, you'll see the numbers go down. It usually takes about 3 weeks for cases to turn into deaths, I'm not sure what that number is for hospitalisations, but it was about two weeks ago it took off. I'd still be cautious about it, as it spreads so quickly, I think another week or two and they'll know more.
I was right along about Stevie
Except that hasn't happened in S.Africa, more than one of whose medics has gone on record saying they don't know why the UK is at panic stations over it.
I can't believe we are being forced to listen to 'cases' as the factor that influences political decisions. What matters is impact and at the moment severity has not been proved to be close to that of Delta or previous. I can understand short term measures whilst we find out but this hasn't been shaped like that.
If case rates matter, lets do the same for runny noses and stubbed toes.
We also need to look at 'hospitalisations' with a new lens - when this first mattered the NHS had limited options when it came to patients coming in. They now have a host of proven drugs to reduce severity at various stages of a patient going in. Not all 'hospitalisations' are now the same.
I can't believe we are being forced to listen to 'cases' as the factor that influences political decisions. What matters is impact and at the moment severity has not been proved to be close to that of Delta or previous. I can understand short term measures whilst we find out but this hasn't been shaped like that.
If case rates matter, lets do the same for runny noses and stubbed toes.
We also need to look at 'hospitalisations' with a new lens - when this first mattered the NHS had limited options when it came to patients coming in. They now have a host of proven drugs to reduce severity at various stages of a patient going in. Not all 'hospitalisations' are now the same.
The same posters who were saying you shouldn't look at case numbers when considering the vaccine effectiveness (or lack thereof) are the same ones saying the case numbers now mean some massive overreaction is needed.
They just parrot the lines fed by the government
There does seem to be a coercive nature to Covid 'advice' (in the UK). This piece struck a chord with me.
https://capx.co/calling-the-vaccine-hesitant-stupid-is-both-cruel-and-counter-productive/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=13/12/2021