Can you post a link to that data please? I had a look and there are about three or four countries with higher rates.
Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?
- Thread starter manwithnoname
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Have a google of the Mickleham one they’re building in Melbourne.
It is one of the highest, the difference between now and when the population wasn't vaccinated, is the the rate of cases turning into hospitalisations and deaths is far lower and also given that most restrictions are now gone, the amount of cases is very low compared to the last time we had few restrictions.
@Rosco
You can either admit you post the odd bit of claptrap - which is fine, no shame posting nonsense - just means you aren’t as smart as you think you are, probably.
Or you can double down and stand by your post as being truthful and accurate.
The difference is that dantes isn't boring and tiresome.
This is true.
Also....no one quite uses graphs like Dantes.
He Mastergraphs over a great many threads.
I am also using lists. Here's a list of of recent history.
(1) Before Trump - lizards used the media to brainwash and control you, and you fell in line like sheep, voting for their warmongering and taxation like socialist vermin
(2) During Trump - thanks to Big D you now know everything is fake news, so for those brief shining years of prosperity you had freedom, until your dumb fweels kicked in
(3) After Trump - lizards have adapted and now use science to brainwash and control you, and you fell back in line like stupid sheep chanting that you follow the science
(4) Now Dantes - like it or not, I'm the only one here that can point out fake science to you, like the blood clots, so it's either me or be happy as a sheep, your choice, or else take your chances on r/conspiracy that's your other choice
(1) Before Trump - lizards used the media to brainwash and control you, and you fell in line like sheep, voting for their warmongering and taxation like socialist vermin
(2) During Trump - thanks to Big D you now know everything is fake news, so for those brief shining years of prosperity you had freedom, until your dumb fweels kicked in
(3) After Trump - lizards have adapted and now use science to brainwash and control you, and you fell back in line like stupid sheep chanting that you follow the science
(4) Now Dantes - like it or not, I'm the only one here that can point out fake science to you, like the blood clots, so it's either me or be happy as a sheep, your choice, or else take your chances on r/conspiracy that's your other choice
Hahahahaha
Day 2 - Answer the question @Rosco
Do you stand by the accuracy of your “Iceland” post?
I’ll add, given you’ve been banging on about “good sources” lately - was it a good source you posted?
Or not?
It’s a very simple question - you either posted something you’ll stand behind or you can admit to posting twaddle.
This is a major flaw in your thinking. When you studied science in school, you never once looked at the author of one of your textbooks and investigated their credibility. Because it was a waste of time and doesn't change the laws of physics. So where did you since pick up this ridiculous habit of judging sources? I don't get it. All the graphs and data in the 'shit' source are not credible because of the name of the website. Then the exact same data taken off this 'good' source https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html is now credible because it's provided by a woke university. You're like a human quantum superposition of half-credible half-doubtful. It's truly insane that you allow your brain to assess information this way.
Schrodinger's Sheep.
Better than trusting stuff made up a metal worker in a bedroom in Scunthorpe - but you know that already.
No, I got vaccinated to reduce the risk of death. It worked. I interpreted that data just fine. Had I ended up with heart inflammation, then the risk would not have paid off, and in my anger I'd have contemplated walking into oxford's campus under the pretence of attending a seminar, and killed every last person that worked on the vaccine.
Ross is posting articles written by some random bloke in Scunthorpe telling you that “vaccines simply do not work” and “vaccines actually worsen the spread of Covid-19” - and that’s what you’re now backing him up on.
Of course, that means you getting the vaccine means you’re therefore a sheep. Doesn’t matter why you got the vaccine - Ross is telling you you’re a sheep for getting it and for not holding the rantings of old mate in Scunthorpe as”truth”.
It kind of means Ross is a bit of a sheep too, well, at least the sort of one that will compromise their fervently held beliefs when it suits them.
Also now gotten yourself into a position were you’re arguing that you shouldn’t judge a source that regularly promotes the ramblings of Dr Vernon Coleman - I’m sure you’ll find the one about how wild Bison will be used to keep the UK population locked up in their “smart cities” very enlightening.
All because poor old Ross can’t quite bring himself to admit he’s posted utter nonsense because he so very smart and such a critical thinker.
Ross posted an article written by the online conspiracy equivalent of The Daily Sport - and here you are trying to argue that you can’t make a judgement on whether that constitutes something that’s likely to be accurate.
(1) Vaccines - reduce the risk of dantes dying
(2) Vaccines - worsen the spread of covid
(3) Natural immunity - lessens the spread of covid
All of these statements are correct. You don't seem to have appreciated this, because you're "following the science" which is laughably stupid. I should never have been offered the jab, it's absolutely crazy, only the vulnerable should have been jabbed and that's it. Of course I'm not going to decline the offer. Other people who value their freedoms more than their risk of death take the opposite view, and object to the vaccination hysteria. Their scientific interpretation is correct, the fact I value my life more than they do is not surprising nor does it contradict their interpretation of the data, since I'd kill you all to save myself in a heartbeat.
(2) Vaccines - worsen the spread of covid
(3) Natural immunity - lessens the spread of covid
All of these statements are correct. You don't seem to have appreciated this, because you're "following the science" which is laughably stupid. I should never have been offered the jab, it's absolutely crazy, only the vulnerable should have been jabbed and that's it. Of course I'm not going to decline the offer. Other people who value their freedoms more than their risk of death take the opposite view, and object to the vaccination hysteria. Their scientific interpretation is correct, the fact I value my life more than they do is not surprising nor does it contradict their interpretation of the data, since I'd kill you all to save myself in a heartbeat.
Not according to the article Ross is claiming is truthful - the vaccine increases the risk of Dantes dying because it doesn’t work.
What do you reckon spreads the virus more - getting vaccinated or relaxing social distancing practices and travel restrictions?
Relaxing restrictions obviously spreads it more, but that isn't an option that you can afford unless like I said a few weeks ago you collectively band together internationally and make china pay for it. Even then it would buy you some time to develop another vaccine or a therapy. It's not a final viable solution in and of itself.
In terms of dying, widespread vaccination increases the risk of the population dying but not of dantes dying. The reduction in the risk of my death has basically been paid for by an increase in the deaths within the wider population. This is obvious to me, and it should be obvious to you that I'm right because you ought to know how intelligent I am. The fake woke news which compares the deaths now (with the vaccine) to the deaths last year (before the vaccine), and virtue signal that the vaccines work don't know how to calculate things. You should be comparing the deaths now with what the deaths would have been if you only vaccinated vulnerable people. That number isn't measured, it's not there to be read from data. You have to calculate it, from the difference in death rates and infection rates, across the vulnerable and non-vulnerable demographics. Calculations are obviously not the forte of these morons. The deaths would be lower if I was your leader because (a) you've protected old people, and (b) you've curtailed the spread of the virus by relying on people's natural immunity to stop the virus in its tracks. People have and are needlessly dying because you've spread the virus more than you needed to. Alas the retarded liberals spent their education becoming woke, so they will never understand what calculating something is, and will continually make stupid choices and pretend it's science. They're beyond help. Fortunately there are enough actual science textbooks and historical recordings of lectures, that future generations might be able to teach themselves to become intelligent without relying upon this thick woke generation of utter fools.
In terms of dying, widespread vaccination increases the risk of the population dying but not of dantes dying. The reduction in the risk of my death has basically been paid for by an increase in the deaths within the wider population. This is obvious to me, and it should be obvious to you that I'm right because you ought to know how intelligent I am. The fake woke news which compares the deaths now (with the vaccine) to the deaths last year (before the vaccine), and virtue signal that the vaccines work don't know how to calculate things. You should be comparing the deaths now with what the deaths would have been if you only vaccinated vulnerable people. That number isn't measured, it's not there to be read from data. You have to calculate it, from the difference in death rates and infection rates, across the vulnerable and non-vulnerable demographics. Calculations are obviously not the forte of these morons. The deaths would be lower if I was your leader because (a) you've protected old people, and (b) you've curtailed the spread of the virus by relying on people's natural immunity to stop the virus in its tracks. People have and are needlessly dying because you've spread the virus more than you needed to. Alas the retarded liberals spent their education becoming woke, so they will never understand what calculating something is, and will continually make stupid choices and pretend it's science. They're beyond help. Fortunately there are enough actual science textbooks and historical recordings of lectures, that future generations might be able to teach themselves to become intelligent without relying upon this thick woke generation of utter fools.
Yeah, well your strategy now is essentially thoughts and prayers that the virus by sheer blind luck doesn't mutate it's way around the vaccine. You could calculate this probability if you had obtained the data from Wuhan, but again, that would be racist so thoughts and prayers it is.
[article]
WHO deems COVID variant detected in Colombia more serious than initially thought
The World Health Organization (WHO) put the variant of coronavirus that was detected in Colombia in January on a watchlist amid concerns it may be resistant to vaccines. The discovery of the so-called Mu variant was first announced by the director of the National Health Institute (INS), Martha Ospina, who raised no concern about the possible dangers posed by the so-called B.1.621.
The INS chief said last week, however, that the Mu variant may have contributed to the high number of infections and deaths recorded during a third peak that started in early March and peaked around 700 daily deaths at the end of June. Currently, more than half of the current COVID-19 cases in Colombia correspond to people who were infected by the Mu variant, Ospina told local media.
The virus has since been detected in some 40 countries around the world. The INS director objected to the Mu variant being referred to as “a Colombian variant” as the strain “was already circulating in Spain and the United States at the time” it was detected by Colombian scientists. The WHO deemed the strain “of interest” earlier this week because of the the possibly higher risk of infection and possible resistance to vaccines. Additionally, the strain originally detected by the INS appear to have have generated other mutations that would need further investigation in order to detect the Mu variant’s possible risk.
https://colombiareports.com/who-dee...colombia-more-serious-than-initially-thought/
[/article]
Most important thing is to not racially abuse the Colombian people by naming the deadly virus after them, that's the number one priority here. Beyond that, whatever will be will be, thoughts and prayers thoughts and prayers roll up for your thoughts and prayers.
WHO deems COVID variant detected in Colombia more serious than initially thought
The World Health Organization (WHO) put the variant of coronavirus that was detected in Colombia in January on a watchlist amid concerns it may be resistant to vaccines. The discovery of the so-called Mu variant was first announced by the director of the National Health Institute (INS), Martha Ospina, who raised no concern about the possible dangers posed by the so-called B.1.621.
The INS chief said last week, however, that the Mu variant may have contributed to the high number of infections and deaths recorded during a third peak that started in early March and peaked around 700 daily deaths at the end of June. Currently, more than half of the current COVID-19 cases in Colombia correspond to people who were infected by the Mu variant, Ospina told local media.
The virus has since been detected in some 40 countries around the world. The INS director objected to the Mu variant being referred to as “a Colombian variant” as the strain “was already circulating in Spain and the United States at the time” it was detected by Colombian scientists. The WHO deemed the strain “of interest” earlier this week because of the the possibly higher risk of infection and possible resistance to vaccines. Additionally, the strain originally detected by the INS appear to have have generated other mutations that would need further investigation in order to detect the Mu variant’s possible risk.
https://colombiareports.com/who-dee...colombia-more-serious-than-initially-thought/
[/article]
Most important thing is to not racially abuse the Colombian people by naming the deadly virus after them, that's the number one priority here. Beyond that, whatever will be will be, thoughts and prayers thoughts and prayers roll up for your thoughts and prayers.
Well at least you’ve acknowledged that relaxing social distancing and travel rules is likely to increase viral transmission - which was something completely missing from the “article” Ross posted.
Small steps, I suppose. I guess I should just claim that I’m a genius for getting vaccinated and everyone else is a woke sheep... or something.
It’s had the effect of keeping Ross quiet from posting his usual guff for a few days as well.
He’ll be avoiding discussions on Xpert Eleven as well, no doubt.
If only one of the effects of the Delta Variant was that it turned you into a raving, albeit entertaining, lunatic it could have been renamed the Dantes Variant and saved the Greeks all that pain and misery.
I've only just seen that 4 newborn babies that required heart surgery were just left to die in Australia because travel to that specialist hospital is illegal due to the restrictions. This is all fucking retarded now, and it's not about saving people, it's about control. This last 18 months (not just covid) has pointed out how we're regressing as a species. Or maybe we're just not as far along as I thought.
