Luckily for me I have access to a copper still. After the great reset I can see my new career as a distiller really taking off.
Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?
- Thread starter manwithnoname
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Every statement in that tweet is highly likely to be correct. For them to be incorrect, it would mean that person is just straight up telling bare faced lies knowing his career will be over when he's caught. So you ought to rule that out, and accept those statements as reliable evidence. You don't do this, you don't assess the probability of something being true or not true based on the information itself, rather you outsource that calculation to the name of the source. This is a major flaw in your mindset.
Because the problem is not with the information in many cases - it’s how it’s being presented.
Besides - should I apply that criteria of yours to all the research you can find at the Doherty Institute in Melbourne - you know... if they’re lying and making stuff up their careers are over?
"...95% of the severe patients are vaccinated" - this is a statement of fact, no professional person would say this if it were untrue or if they didn't have plausible deniability.
"...This is an unvaccinated case fatality rate of 0.2%....This is a vaccinated case fatality rate of 1%" - this is a statement of fact too, same as above
"...This means the Covid-19 injections seem to be increasing the risk of death due to Covid-19 by 400%" - this is an interpretation of data, you can get it wrong or get it right without meaning that you are lying, or trying to misrepresent it, it frankly doesn't matter what your intention or presentation skills are, it's just wrong
The reporters at the Daily Expose and the researchers at Doherty Institute are not lying about statements of fact, they are wrong about the models they're guessing fits the facts. This is forgivable for a journalist, at least they bothered to get the data for you rather than virtue signal an opinion like CNN do. It is unforgivable for a scientist, because you have an infallible way to test your model: make a fucking prediction and then do the fucking experiment. The scientists have no excuse for publishing data and then fitting their opinion to it without proving that their opinion is right. That is the difference.
Last edited:
So, what do they want a cookie for not doing their sums wrong? Let's take gravity. You have medieval scientists recording all the data from their observations, noting the movements of Saturn. Then people misinterpret that data and say look, look at the way Saturn is moving, something is changing it, God did it!! See God exists!! Then you have to point out to these scientists that nothing is changing, Saturn just looks smaller or bigger depending upon how far it is from Earth, you need to correct your observations to take that into account.
Now that you've managed to do it, you shouldn't be proud. It's not a good thing. You should be completely ashamed of your species that it even arose. So let's leave that aside. You've got the sums right in the end. Now what? Where is your model? Where is your formula that you can use to predict motion? The thing you need is a universal law of gravitation. That's the point of science. Do we have a model for vaccination? Nope? Got it. We're just recording numbers, then occasionally getting into debates when we fuck up the counting of those numbers. That's what you are mistaking for science. You're being clowned by academics who are stealing your money, literally.
Remind me again Dantes - your job in life is to analyse data and make recommendations to people tasked with purchasing equipment- did I remember that right.
Is this self loathing manifesting itself?
Are you trying to reach out and tell us you are the embodiment of all that you think is wrong in society?
Is this self loathing manifesting itself?
Are you trying to reach out and tell us you are the embodiment of all that you think is wrong in society?
Do I conduct research like a retard, then cope with it by pointing out that other people are retards? No, never. In the rare instances when the problem is genuinely unsolvable, then the solution is to sue the third party suppliers who manufactured the equipment, it is never to go full retard.
You will still be able to extract significant amounts of pleasure from it, just by seeing the looks on the faces of woke liberals as their diverse leaders are forced to admit their failure.
Are you calling Boris and Co woke and diverse leaders then? That’s some parallel universe you live in.
Senator Rand Paul & top Republicans demand Fauci’s firing after new docs indicate his agency funded risky Covid studies in China
8 Sep, 2021 01:40 / Updated 6 hours ago
FILE PHOTOS: Security personnel keep watch outside Wuhan Institute of Virology, in Hubei province, China, February 3, 2021; (Inset) Anthony Fauci speaks at a Senate hearing in Washington, DC, July 20, 2021. © Reuters / Thomas Peter; Reuters / J. Scott Applewhite- 336
Top White House Covid adviser Anthony Fauci is facing calls to resign after newly released documents suggested his agency funded dangerous “gain-of-function” research in China, despite previous denials.
Demands for the health adviser’s firing come after the Intercept obtained more than 900 pages of material related to coronavirus research funded by Fauci’s agency – the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) – including previously unpublished grant requests from a US-based organization that passed federal funds to the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.
Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), who has repeatedly sparred with Fauci throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, touted the document dump in a Tuesday tweet, saying the materials “make it abundantly clear that [Fauci] needs to be held accountable,” noting he had already asked the Justice Department to review the adviser for “lying” in previous congressional testimony.
The documents published by the Intercept show that the US-based organization, the EcoHealth Alliance, was granted some $3.1 million in funding approved by Fauci’s NIAID – later increased to exceed $3.7 million in total, according to other government records. Of that grant, $599,000 was funneled to the WIV, specifically to fund work to “identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans,” according to the Intercept.
The firm’s grant application acknowledged potential dangers posed by the project, noting that “fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs [coronaviruses] while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”
ALSO ON RT.COMDeadly bat caves & humanized mice tests: Released docs describe ‘HIGHEST RISK’ involved in US-funded coronavirus research in Wuhan
The EcoHealth Alliance’s joint research with the WIV has raised other questions about potentially unsafe work at the Wuhan lab, and whether ‘gain-of-function’ research – which aims to increase the virulence and infectiousness of pathogens to better study them – was carried out there. The research was considered so risky that the government imposed a halt on federal funding in 2014, though that has since been lifted.
Fauci has repeatedly denied that his agency funded, directly or indirectly, any gain-of-function work at the WIV, including in high-profile confrontations with lawmakers such as Senator Paul.
However, according to Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who spoke to the Intercept after reviewing the documents, the research funded by EcoHealth included work to engineer novel viruses and test “their ability to infect mice that were engineered to display human type receptors on their cell.”
In a lengthy Twitter thread posted following the Intercept story, Ebright went on to argue that the WIV work indeed constituted “gain-of-function research as defined in federal policies,” and that Fauci and other top health officials have lied to the public about it.
The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful.
The revelations have prompted a number of Republican critics to demand Fauci’s resignation, or even his outright firing, while some called for further investigation into his ties to research at the WIV.
“Just months after Fauci testified the NIH has never funded gain-of-function in the Wuhan lab, newly released documents show that he LIED & there was funding,” the Arizona GOP wrote on Twitter, adding “Fauci must be fired & investigated immediately!”
Despite Fauci’s insistence in public that his agency did not fund gain-of-function research in China, he has suggested in private that such funding may have occurred, as was revealed in a trove of communications released in June after a FOIA request by several news agencies.
In a February 2020 email to his top deputy at NIAID, Hugh Auchincloss, Fauci attached a research paper about a gain-of-function study at the WIV funded by none other than the EcoHealth Alliance (whose involvement was only disclosed later, after the authors initially “omitted” the funding source). The message took on an urgent tone, telling Auchincloss to read the paper and get back to him, as “it is essential that we speak.”
Auchincloss replied that he read the attached paper, explaining that the research in question was performed “before the gain of function pause” – referring to the federal funding moratorium – and that another staffer would “try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.”
While the email trove does not appear to contain any follow-up from Auchincloss about the gain-of-function study, the exchange suggests there was concern among top NIAID officials, including Fauci himself, that the agency may have contributed to the controversial research.
Though Senator Paul asked federal prosecutors to investigate Fauci’s testimony for perjury in July, to date it is unclear whether any probe has moved forward. The Joe Biden administration, meanwhile, continues to rely on Fauci as one of its top pandemic advisers, and is unlikely to heed Republican calls for his dismissal.
They lie.
They virtue signal.
They act like snowflakes when criticised.
They do zero substantive work.
Their strategy is thoughts and prayers.
They raise taxes, siphon money to their mates, and promote globalist socialist policies.
They can't answer basic questions.
They have no clue what they're talking about.
They're woke.
That's lizards, not the woke.
I think Dantes just called himself woke.
Some of the conclusions from data in this pandemic, rival flat-earthers ability to show the Dunning-Kruger effect.
I have to think that's a good thing for the future of the human race!
If that was true why would the CDC & IOM and recommend it for all Afghan refugees ?
https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/guidelines/overseas-guidelines.html
The scare stories about ivermectin are being pushed by the vaccine companies who stand to gain from it not being used in Covid. The Emergency Use permissions for their shit vaccines is dependent on their not being an alternative treatment for Covid.
They recommend it for killing parasites, not for treating Covid which is nothing like a parasite. The dosage needed of ivermectin to kill Covid kills people before it kills Covid, especially when people are using the one designed for horses and not people.
It's really bizarre that some people that think they know better than 99% of medics won't trust them on the vaccine which has huge amounts of science to back it up, but will trust taking a horse parasite treatment which has almost no evidence that it will treat Covid. I mean I can somewhat understand not buying into modern medicine, and also that the pandemic is overstated. But I've no idea where this ivermectin thing fits in.
The people rely upon logic, which is a crude approximation of mathematics. So what they're saying is the science disagrees with mathematics, and then quite rightly they opt to trust mathematics. If the scientists quit lying every other word and paid more attention to mathematical consistency, then they'd have better luck gaining the trust of people. It's interesting. I think these stupid data science virologists look at smarter researchers that model fundamental particle interactions and financial derivatives, where they have to invent and use mathematics which cannot be crudely approximated by logic, and they think their research is on the same level, and think that's what science is, and then excuse themselves of having to be logically consistent.
Like no matter how many scientists and experts provide how much research and consensus and virtue signalling, they will never make you believe 1+1=3, that's not how brains work.
There's over 100 studies that confirm its efficacy.
The fact that you describe it is a horse parasite treatment when it's been used in humans for 50 years shows how the neuro linguistic programming works. If the mainstream media started calling water "horse drink" you could probably get plenty of gobshites to stop drinking it.
The point I made is that if it was as dangerous as stated on fertility in Rurikbirds tweet then it would not have been used for the last 50 years and since it's a staple in African medicine their population explosion kinda undermines the sterilisation shite.
Not me, I love ket. Everyone calls that a horse tranquiliser. Because it is. Also fun
As for the studies. It can destroy covid in a lab in an agar plate when shitloads is used. There's no study by anyone who didn't buy their doctrate online that shows that its effective in humans.