I give it 6 months before you're telling us about some other mad project you're working on while partying at the weekend with champions league finalists.
Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?
- Thread starter manwithnoname
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
A wind farm brewery
Hmmm... beer does make people fart... there could be an idea there you know...
Sorry to hear that mate. Stay strong. It's amazing looking back, at my age, how life's up and downs are cyclical. You'll get back up there.
Last edited:
Soz for moaning last night. I've got opportunities but I'm just so fucking tired and sometimes it feels like the last twenty years was all for nothing just because this last year came along, but that's bullshit because I've got great people close to me and that's by far the most important thing. Loads of people have it well worse than me. Just feeling under a lot of pressure.
Part of me wishes he descends into madness, rocks back and forth in his chair, then 3D prints an assault rifle, buys a train ticket to westminster, and becomes my hero, then converts to islam and plays the coming out card to walk away free.
They are sweeeeeettttttt
You’ve always been insane.
If you've vaccinated almost all your older people, and mostly haven't vaccinated any younger people, you'll get a higher percentage of vaccinated deaths. This is as expected, given the mortality risk to someone <50 vs the efficacy of the vaccine.
It's all captain hindsight stuff at this point, but I think despite the English love of a queue, the ideal set of decisions would be to vaccinate the pool of people <45or so as one group, given they don't have massively different risks. That way you get some degree of immunity in each group of social peers, rather than entire unvaccinated cohorts swapping breath.
It's all captain hindsight stuff at this point, but I think despite the English love of a queue, the ideal set of decisions would be to vaccinate the pool of people <45or so as one group, given they don't have massively different risks. That way you get some degree of immunity in each group of social peers, rather than entire unvaccinated cohorts swapping breath.
I think we already have our quota of mad cunts on the site.
Probably not that Delta is less deadly in itself. But that Delta mainly only able to infect younger people now, because of the vaccine, so less deadly because of that.
It's showing that the vaccines don't prevent you catching and spreading the delta variant. They also don't prevent more or less 0.3% of you from dying. Or if you're an idiotic glass half full fool, then it shows that the vaccines prevent more or less 1.7% of you from dying as you otherwise would have.
But it doesn't have any data related to fatality rates when vaccinated v fatality rates when not. And even that wouldn't be enough because you'd need that data by age. Like more vaccinated people might be dying of Delta than unvaccinated because the people dying are vulnerable despite being vaxxed and the people unvaccinated are young and healthy. I think it's too complex for little graphs now.
https://assets.publishing.service.g...ants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf
Page 38 onwards might be what you're after
Thanks Dantes. But on a separate graph it also shows I'm much less likely to be hospitalised from 2 doses too. If I ever do catch the delta beta or alpha variant.
Therefore I'm happy in that knowledge.
Yea that's fair enough. Too early to be certain why the lower case to hospitalisation ratio / fatally rate. I'm just happy they're lower.