Actually, he brushes his teeth better than the rest of us...
Chinese "Devil Virus" - anyone worried?
- Thread starter manwithnoname
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Yes. The dosage is probably way too high for it to have such side effects so frequently in the population. A sore arm should be about it had they spent time to optimise the dose. A temporary bout of parkinsons disease is not it.
You're confusing what is possible with the probability attached to what is possible.
You're confusing probability with confirmation bias.
I had the sweats, couldn’t eat, banging headache and was generally irritable. I don’t think it was down to the first dose. It was the copious amount of beer I drank after having it.
You could’ve walked it off.
You're meant to get it in the arm.. why are they injecting your back?
Perhaps. But the probability of dantes suffering long-term neurological damage is far more important than the possible consequences for other people.
Just like when your mate throws up after a big night but blames it on the kebab.
I got the Chinese vaccine.
They do it the same way they do a Chinese Covid tests - in the anus.
[article]
Two jabs of either vaccine give a similar level of protection against symptomatic disease from the Indian variant as they do for the Kent one.
However, both vaccines were only 33% effective against the Indian variant three weeks after the first dose.
The Pfizer vaccine was found to be 88% effective at stopping symptomatic disease from the Indian variant two weeks after the second dose, compared with 93% effectiveness against the Kent variant.
While the AstraZeneca jab was 60% effective against the Indian variant, compared with 66% against the Kent variant.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57214596
[/article]
A rare dantes was partially wrong shocker. So 33% it is. Fuck.
It's now up to 60 and 66% after the first jab ... the length of time to exposure after the jab the better the protection, even before the second jab.
Let me guess. Nothing more than a sore arm and now you're far better protected than dantes. Yay for woke western "science".
The context there is that he will be faced with a surprise disease outbreak like each of the administration's before him. Do better. Seriously.
Context was to scare him into sending money. Money Fauci then sent to Wuhan to do research on creating that scary virus that would justify sending more money to Fauci. Fauci needs the monies after all.
Wuhan lab staff had Covid-like symptoms before outbreak disclosed, says report
Issued on: 24/05/2021 - 00:25
In this Feb. 2, 2021, file photo, a member of a World Health Organization team is seen wearing protective gear during a field visit to the Hubei Animal Disease Control and Prevention Center for another day of field visit in Wuhan in central China's Hubei province. © Ng Han Guan, AP
Text by:NEWS WIRES
3 min
Three researchers from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) sought hospital care in November 2019, months before China disclosed the COVID-19 pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, citing a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report.
ADVERTISING
The newspaper said the report - which provides fresh details on the number of researchers affected, the timing of their illnesses, and their hospital visits - may add weight to calls for a broader probe of whether the COVID-19 virus could have escaped from the laboratory.
The report came on the eve of a meeting of the World Health Organization's decision-making body, which is expected to discuss the next phase of an investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
A National Security Council spokeswoman had no comment on the Journal's report but said the Biden administration continued to have "serious questions about the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its origins within the Peoples Republic of China."
She said the U.S. government was working with the WHO and other member states to support an expert-driven evaluation of the pandemic's origins "that is free from interference or politicisation."
"We're not going to make pronouncements that prejudge an ongoing WHO study into the source of SARS-CoV-2, but we've been clear that sound and technically credible theories should be thoroughly evaluated by international experts," she said.
The Journal said current and former officials familiar with the intelligence about the lab researchers expressed a range of views about the strength of the report's supporting evidence, with one unnamed person saying it needed "further investigation and additional corroboration."
The United States, Norway, Canada, Britain and other countries in March expressed concerns about the WHO-led COVID-19 origins study, and called for further investigation and full access to all pertinent human, animal and other data about the early stages of the outbreak.
Issued on: 24/05/2021 - 00:25
In this Feb. 2, 2021, file photo, a member of a World Health Organization team is seen wearing protective gear during a field visit to the Hubei Animal Disease Control and Prevention Center for another day of field visit in Wuhan in central China's Hubei province. © Ng Han Guan, AP
Text by:NEWS WIRES
3 min
Three researchers from China's Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) sought hospital care in November 2019, months before China disclosed the COVID-19 pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday, citing a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report.
ADVERTISING
The newspaper said the report - which provides fresh details on the number of researchers affected, the timing of their illnesses, and their hospital visits - may add weight to calls for a broader probe of whether the COVID-19 virus could have escaped from the laboratory.
The report came on the eve of a meeting of the World Health Organization's decision-making body, which is expected to discuss the next phase of an investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
A National Security Council spokeswoman had no comment on the Journal's report but said the Biden administration continued to have "serious questions about the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its origins within the Peoples Republic of China."
She said the U.S. government was working with the WHO and other member states to support an expert-driven evaluation of the pandemic's origins "that is free from interference or politicisation."
"We're not going to make pronouncements that prejudge an ongoing WHO study into the source of SARS-CoV-2, but we've been clear that sound and technically credible theories should be thoroughly evaluated by international experts," she said.
The Journal said current and former officials familiar with the intelligence about the lab researchers expressed a range of views about the strength of the report's supporting evidence, with one unnamed person saying it needed "further investigation and additional corroboration."
The United States, Norway, Canada, Britain and other countries in March expressed concerns about the WHO-led COVID-19 origins study, and called for further investigation and full access to all pertinent human, animal and other data about the early stages of the outbreak.
The next phase of the WHO's investigation will need a bigger budget. Poor guys, trying hard to protect our health and get to the truth, poor poor people, they deserve monies. More monies so the WHO can continue to do their works and get to the bottom of it all with proper reports and recommendations. All written by smart scientists. Spare no expense!
Agent Frogfish .....
Weren't EcoHealth the body that sent the research monies to the Wuhan lab? They'd know better than us if their money turned out to responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, they're the closest people to the matter so I'm inclined to believe them without question. Perhaps send them even more monies to make sure.
