With Gerrard around to raise that bar significantly.Liverpool have had midfields with Poulsen and Lucas in them.
And Spearing and Lucas.
And Charlie Adam and Lucas
With Gerrard around to raise that bar significantly.Liverpool have had midfields with Poulsen and Lucas in them.
And Spearing and Lucas.
And Charlie Adam and Lucas
With Gerrard around to raise that bar significantly.
Anyone with half a brain would pick whichever combo you just made plus Gerrard over our current bunch.Nowhere near enough
Can is very good when he is on his game. He was a vital performer in the final stretch of last season. He is inconsistent but he is usually not our worst midfielder. He has also been improving every season and people also tend to forget he is still only in his early 20s. He definitely has a higher upside when compared to Hendo or Gini imo.
We are losing a good player no doubt about that. It is a pity we groomed him just to let him leave on a whim.
Anyone with half a brain would pick whichever combo you just made plus Gerrard over our current bunch.
Even you, or maybe not.
The fuck are you talking about.Roy Hodgson has the half of a brain you're looking for. It didn't work out well for him.
The fuck are you talking about.
Jesus Christ...
"Let him leave on a whim"?Can is very good when he is on his game. He was a vital performer in the final stretch of last season. He is inconsistent but he is usually not our worst midfielder. He has also been improving every season and people also tend to forget he is still only in his early 20s. He definitely has a higher upside when compared to Hendo or Gini imo.
We are losing a good player no doubt about that. It is a pity we groomed him just to let him leave on a whim.
So Hodgson had the specific option of picking between Henderson, Can and Milner vs Gerrard and however else?You said anyone with half a brain would pick Gerrard, Poulsen and Lucas over our current midfield. Roy Hodgson had half a brain. He did pick those three in that combination. They were significantly worse than what our current midfield is producing. So you're wrong. I suppose you blocked out the memories of those times, so I'm happy to bring them back to the forefront of your mind.
So Hodgson had the specific option of picking between Henderson, Can and Milner vs Gerrard and however else?
To expand that question and say Gerrard and however vs anyone in the world is a blatant rewrite.
Let's revisit the Hodgson era. Yep, I'd take Lucas, Meireles and Gerrard plus Aquilani vs the current garbage midfield.
I disagree, Lucas, Meireles and Gerrard were better than what we have today.No, you were saying this is our worst midfield. Then you defended the point by saying Gerrard raised the bar enough in midfields of the recent past. I suspect you thought this was a hypothetical as you'd blocked out the actual memories. However, it's not hypothetical. We have the benefit of witnessing Hodgson's midfield, compare it to Klopp's midfield, and categorically conclude that the former was far worse in spite of having Gerrard in it.
Whatever option Hodgson had at his disposal is a different argument. The point here is we've endured worse midfields than the one now. And we endured it because of the owl faced twat.
I disagree, Lucas, Meireles and Gerrard were better than what we have today.
Well that's cherry picking just like our friend Brendan did. Who just forgot to mention Meireles.Yes I would agree with that only because Meireles was a fairly good player. Which is why I said Gerrard, Poulsen and Lucas.
I was using all of our midfielders as an example, so comparing them to say...Diao and Cheyrou, without mentioning Hamann, Gerrard, Murphy and Redknapp and deducing that we've had worse midfields isn't exactly fair. Which is exactly what Brendan did.Oh wait, you're talking about the squad options as a whole being the worst, and not a specific combination from the available options? Had you made that clearer, we could have avoided this debate.
He's shite
You mad?Poor the Modo
Of course I as well am disappointed that he's going for free but what comes around goes around I guess. We got Matip for free so...Well I'm in your minority and I think its a shame to lose him for nothing. Certainly until we have someone better which we don't really have at the moment.
He can be very annoying at times, switching off at crucial times, but overall I think he's worth having. And he's only 23.
Nutshell.Quite. He's never been unplayable. He's a big, strong guy who occasionally applies himself well. Sometimes it works out for him. Most of the time it doesn't. He's a Jack of all trades - apart from endeavour, he doesn't really excel at anything with any consistency. It's a massive cock up to be losing him on a free, but he's not the future of our midfield, and he shouldn't be the present either.
YepDid Klopp give young players a go in midfield at Dortmund?
I’m guessing Grujic is not giving anyone the impression that he’s a top tier talent otherwise he’d be getting more game time.