[quote author=Brendan link=topic=42120.msg1219290#msg1219290 date=1289917045]
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42120.msg1219286#msg1219286 date=1289916763]
I think he means that Purslow and Broughton wouldnt have appointed a lame duck like Hodgson had we not been facing economic destitution 6 months ago.
[/quote]
Ah, it makes sense now.
Wait, no. No it doesn't.
[/quote]
When Hodgson was appointed, it was clear that they were of the view that Rafa had to be replaced. The fact that a poor choice was made probably did have a lot to do with the fact that any top manager wouldnt touch us with a barge pole.
We were in a mess, and no one evn knew if we'd be in administration in a matter of months.
The fact that a poor choice was made doesnt necessarily mean that no choice should have been made, even if has backfired spectacularly.
Unless of course you're still of the view that Purslow and the Chelsea Lover were in actual fact trying to destroy Liverpool from within, which was why hey apointed a shit manager.
[quote author=Avmenon link=topic=42120.msg1219286#msg1219286 date=1289916763]
I think he means that Purslow and Broughton wouldnt have appointed a lame duck like Hodgson had we not been facing economic destitution 6 months ago.
[/quote]
Ah, it makes sense now.
Wait, no. No it doesn't.
[/quote]
When Hodgson was appointed, it was clear that they were of the view that Rafa had to be replaced. The fact that a poor choice was made probably did have a lot to do with the fact that any top manager wouldnt touch us with a barge pole.
We were in a mess, and no one evn knew if we'd be in administration in a matter of months.
The fact that a poor choice was made doesnt necessarily mean that no choice should have been made, even if has backfired spectacularly.
Unless of course you're still of the view that Purslow and the Chelsea Lover were in actual fact trying to destroy Liverpool from within, which was why hey apointed a shit manager.