• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Bruce: We only paid £4m for Turner

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=37305.msg993518#msg993518 date=1258737287]
Rage - I have a genuine question.

Has anyone on here ever changed your opinion on anything related to Liverpool FC 2004-2009?
[/quote]

He never answer you. He never answers a straight question.
 
i think i'm going to ask sunny to add one of them online bullying links to the site.

sticks and stones boys...

my opinion on this thread is valid whether you agree with it or not but you want to turn this into an attack on me.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993525#msg993525 date=1258737578]
my opinion on this thread is valid whether you agree with it or not but you want to turn this into an attack on me.
[/quote]

You're quite right, your opinion is valid, however I don't really want to attack you at all.

I just don't want to have to read any posts by you, about you or in reply to you.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993525#msg993525 date=1258737578]
i think i'm going to ask sunny to add one of them online bullying links to the site.

sticks and stones boys...

my opinion on this thread is valid whether you agree with it or not but you want to turn this into an attack on me.
[/quote]

No, as per the new user guidelines, it's an attack on your posts.

Which are dull, stupid, biased, repetitive, hateful, unfunny, predictable and despised by 99% of the people who use this site.

Get with the programme rag!
 
i'm sure that there are plenty of people who read this forum find the cyber bullying that you and the rest of your friends engaged in to be really offensive and something i have no doubt prevents new members from posting.

none of you have countered my point on his thread but rather chosen to attempt to trade insults with me.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993547#msg993547 date=1258738742]
i'm sure that there are plenty of people who read this forum find the cyber bullying that you and the rest of your friends engaged in to be really offensive and something i have no doubt prevents new members from posting.

none of you have countered my point on his thread but rather chosen to attempt to trade insults with me.

[/quote]

Ahboohooohoohoo

I haven't insulted you personally rag. Not even you could claim that.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993547#msg993547 date=1258738742]
i'm sure that there are plenty of people who read this forum find the cyber bullying that you and the rest of your friends engaged in to be really offensive and something i have no doubt prevents new members from posting.

none of you have countered my point on his thread but rather chosen to attempt to trade insults with me.


[/quote]

Maybe not on this thread but plenty of posters have countered your posts on other threads and all you do is go off on a tangent to avoid replying back to them.

What you don't seem to understand is that its not the content of your posts but the offensive style and biased nature of it. Although, your offensive style has been somewhat lowered after your ban. i.e. you haven't accused anyone of being a cocksucker for a while.
 
prior to the rule clarification plenty of people were calling others all sorts so don't try to point in my direction.

as for this thread i'm not the one going off on a tangent am i?

and what exactly on this thread have i said that's offensive?

you and the rest of the bullies don't intimidate me mr mullet.
 
If nobody likes you, and I do mean nobody, then it's safe to say they're not wrong.
 
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=37305.msg993561#msg993561 date=1258739855]
If nobody likes you, and I do mean nobody, then it's safe to say they're not wrong.
[/quote]

i think you overestimate the reach of this forum.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993556#msg993556 date=1258739493]
prior to the rule clarification plenty of people were calling others all sorts so don't try to point in my direction.

as for this thread i'm not the one going off on a tangent am i?

and what exactly on this thread have i said that's offensive?

you and the rest of the bullies don't intimidate me mr mullet.
[/quote]

If I wanted to intimidate you I can but I don't

I have not bullied you nor am I even trying. I'm trying to explain to you why it always seem to the forum against rage.

Don't you find it strange how 99% of the posters are against you even when they agree with your point? There are some seriously good posters here and they are saying you contribute little to it.

All it takes it one bad apple to ruining something good.

No doubt, you'll treat this as another attack on you but I assure you it is not.
 
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993565#msg993565 date=1258739974]
[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=37305.msg993561#msg993561 date=1258739855]
If nobody likes you, and I do mean nobody, then it's safe to say they're not wrong.
[/quote]

i think you overestimate the reach of this forum.
[/quote]

In which case you're probably not this much of a wanker in real life.

But I could be hugely mistaken.
 
[quote author=Red Mullet link=topic=37305.msg993566#msg993566 date=1258740008]
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993556#msg993556 date=1258739493]
prior to the rule clarification plenty of people were calling others all sorts so don't try to point in my direction.

as for this thread i'm not the one going off on a tangent am i?

and what exactly on this thread have i said that's offensive?

you and the rest of the bullies don't intimidate me mr mullet.
[/quote]

If I wanted to intimidate you I can but I don't

I have not bullied you nor am I even trying. I'm trying to explain to you why it always seem to the forum against rage.

Don't you find it strange how 99% of the posters are against you even when they agree with your point? There are some seriously good posters here and they are saying you contribute little to it.

All it takes it one bad apple to ruining something good.

No doubt, you'll treat this as another attack on you but I assure you it is not.
[/quote]

so you agree with what i said on this thread but found it so painful to acknowledge you and the rest of 'your boys' decide to go on an attack on me. really grown up.

as for thinking you can intimidate someone on the internet... what on earth are you smoking?
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=37305.msg993522#msg993522 date=1258737383]
how about because i'm a adult who doesn't resort to personal insults, don't break the rules and am brave enough to have an opinion?

I don't like you. Your posts are rubbish, repetitive, humourless and boring, and I wish you were banned.

I have a feeling I am not alone in thinking this. Let's see.
[/quote]

You are not alone. This guy is tedious.
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=37305.msg993549#msg993549 date=1258738836]
[quote author=rage link=topic=37305.msg993547#msg993547 date=1258738742]
i'm sure that there are plenty of people who read this forum find the cyber bullying that you and the rest of your friends engaged in to be really offensive and something i have no doubt prevents new members from posting.

none of you have countered my point on his thread but rather chosen to attempt to trade insults with me.

[/quote]

Ahboohooohoohoo

I haven't insulted you personally rag. Not even you could claim that.
[/quote]

no but like the would be bully you feel free to join in. go look at your last post on page3.

tick tock boys tick tock. its about time u all grew a set
 
I agree that a manager, or the clubs staff that deals with transfers, must be able to wheel and deal. This is obvious and as plain as day. I do not agree that a manager from the lower leagues must be employed to do this.

I don't find it painful to acknowledge it if you're 100% right but you haven't demonstrated that

I don't smoke.

If you think no one can intimidate anyone on the internet then surely no one can really bully someone on the internet?

Once again, your accusational tone that posters find grating, has reared itself.
 
[quote author=Red Mullet link=topic=37305.msg993582#msg993582 date=1258740943]
I agree that a manager, or the clubs staff that deals with transfers, must be able to wheel and deal. This is obvious and as plain as day. I do not agree that a manager from the lower leagues must be employed to do this.

I don't find it painful to acknowledge it if you're 100% right but you haven't demonstrated that

I don't smoke.

If you think no one can intimidate anyone on the internet then surely no one can really bully someone on the internet?

Once again, your accusational tone that posters find grating, has reared itself.
[/quote]

It's pointless and fruitless trying to reason with him. His arguments are flawed and he changes them to suit his own agenda, repeatedly, cf his argument here regards a lower league manager, ignoring the point that a lower league manager wouldn't have attracted the best players we have, like Torres and Mascherano. Ignoring that Rafa has, on occasion, come up with some steals in Agger, Yossi, Skrtel, Arbeloa, Garcia, Crouch and Aurelio.

Yeah he's made mistakes (is anyone even disputing that?), but his constant assessment that we weren't in for player X who's now doing well at another club as a means to beat Rafa with is both pathetic and transparent. He's on an agenda, he doesn't show objectivity or reason, he doesn't try to see other people's opinions or hold his hands up and say 'ok, I see where you're coming from'.

He's pointless and serves the forum no purpose other than sparking frustration and bewilderment, which ultimately ruins threads because he feeds off it. He drops a worm and we bite and he fucking loves it. And if the powers that be can't see that and continue to put him on some kind of platter above those who throw abuse around (let's face it, we're all big boys and girls here, and if you can't take a bit of banter and cyber abuse, then you're not cut out for it), then I really fucking despair for the forum.
 
What mark said x 1 trillion

I post less on this Football Forum directly because if I was exposed to rag too often, I'd be unable to help myself and fly into a diatribe-filled rant filled with words like 'cunt', 'WUM' and 'annoying fucking flid'

And King Rollosco would ban me again

Perhaps we should all PM the mods incessantly until rag is banned, or perhaps decamp to another site, because there is no doubt that rag is totally fucking this Forum

Trufax x a billion

The End
 
I'd rather be called a bellend for having and opinion than have to listen to the monotonous drone of that cunt any longer.

Amen.
 
Again, if fucking Zen Master Sperminator Mark can be traduced like this, one has to wonder why rag is tolerated

Has anyone ever seen Mark stoop this low before?

No

Ban the Rag!

Who is with me?
 
I didn't realise I'd stooped low lol. Seriously, I thought that was quite reasonable, all things considered.

It's not about wanting one form of opinion, it's about what posters bring to the forum. I hate to use Rafa4pm as an example, he's incredibly pro-Rafa but at least he contributes to the forum and sees reason, and if he doesn't you can rely on him to make a joke of it, or himself, tongue-in-cheek and all that. This guy has no endearing quality whatsoever.

And as I posted amidst the fracas in the post on the GC forum, for all the abuse thrown around by Bren and Ryan (for example), it's negligible given both are intelligent enough to contribute quality posts to the forum.

For the gazillionth and last time, it's not about cliques, it's not about mates, it's not about one rule for one and one rule for another, it's about what you contribute to the forum.

Could it be any plainer?
 
I meant 'low' by your usual standards

I stoop below them all the time

Christ, I can't even get behind a poster and offer support without fucking it up

Anyway, I am right behind you, I don't think even I pissed you off this much on KT, and that says it all

Rag Out!
 
Heh.... I second that motion, or is third now?

He's proven that he can post normally in the General Chat, so why he persists with this "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH" shtick after people have been patient with him is rather obvious.

I think he's probably the most tedious WUM this site has ever had and given that we've endured Glock for years, that's some fucking achievement.
 
That's two of our most Zen posters in agreement

Three, if you count me

Which no fucker does, obnov

*meditates*
 
Ha.. isn't it good how we're all growing old together?? Bren has chilled loads. Seriously, I love this place, and I love you guys (except Rage).

*has 10th beer*
 
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=37305.msg993705#msg993705 date=1258749113]
No I fucking haven't

*angry*
[/quote]

You have Bren.

Here's an example, You only refer to me as the "slightly annoying div" nowadays (Same before the new rules came into play as well).

Just face it you're growing old and mellowing as a consequence.
 
[quote author=Rafa4PM link=topic=37305.msg993717#msg993717 date=1258749845]
[quote author=Brendan link=topic=37305.msg993705#msg993705 date=1258749113]
No I fucking haven't

*angry*
[/quote]

You have Bren.

Here's an example, You only refer to me as the "slightly annoying div" nowadays (Same before the new rules came into play as well).

Just face it you're growing old and mellowing as a consequence.
[/quote]

Nah he aint changed, he's still a biatch. He just doesn't like getting banned, is all. But I'm with him on the Rage thing 100%.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom