• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

Keep reading. You made it past the twitter link this time, and past the headline. Keep going, you're almost there!

The anti trump political opponent referenced is the lincoln project pac.

You'll explain next that they are some dark money funded lapdog of biden?

You should pony up, help trump fight the good fight.
 
Keep reading. You made it past the twitter link this time, and past the headline. Keep going, you're almost there!

The anti trump political opponent referenced is the lincoln project pac.

You'll explain next that they are some dark money funded lapdog of biden?

You should pony up, help trump fight the good fight.

They exist to make sure Trump doesn't get elected, so it's not much of a stretch.

It begs the question of just how hopeless these lawsuits are if the group that exists to ensure Trump doesn't get elected needs to try to stop them going ahead.
 
They exist to make sure Trump doesn't get elected, so it's not much of a stretch.

It begs the question of just how hopeless these lawsuits are if the group that exists to ensure Trump doesn't get elected needs to try to stop them going ahead.

Or they exist to fundraise, just as trump is doing this to fundraise, and they'll follow the publicity. We live in a world of colocated idiocies, so if trump's supporters are dumb enough to give the rnc and his pac money to harass via the courts in a losing effort, then the lincoln project know there are democrats dumb enough to pay to do the same. Biden wouldn't do shit. You never interrupt your enemy when they are making mistakes. Lincoln are like the remora on a shark that is attacking the last vestiges of a bloodied bait ball, tattered maga hats, the plague, and God, the fat body odor.
 
No, I refer to her list. As in list list.



As in one of these list lists.



If you open up her photo in photoshop, or even paint will suffice, add the moustache, and it will all make total sense.
I'd like to see this MS Paint Avvy-esque masterpiece.
 
Trump's legal challenges are being flayed alive ... surprise surprise. However is Dantes brain ever going to recover from this thrashing ? All these conspiracy theorist lunatics being ground to dust.

Losses
Lawsuits dropped : Arizona and Nevada
Lawsuits thrown out : Georgia, Michigan, Detroit, Arizona, Penn, Nevada
Law Firm threw in the towel : Penn

Wins
Their sole win has been in Penn ... and it doesn't even matter one iota whilst losing one that does (below) : The ruling concerns a relatively small number of voters that are not even included in the election results for the state, where Biden leads by 62,000 votes with more than 98 percent of estimated votes reported.

However : On Friday, in another Pennsylvania case, the Trump cause was torpedoed yet again: an appeals court upheld the state’s method of handling post-Election Day absentee ballots, which could add more votes to Biden’s total.

“They’re throwing the kitchen sink against the wall to see what sticks — a mixed metaphor that’s deserving of this legal strategy. And ‘legal strategy’ should be in quotes,” said Ben Ginsberg, a veteran Republican election law attorney who headed the famed Florida recount team that ultimately led to George W. Bush becoming president.

Barry Richard, a veteran Republican election law attorney who also handled George W. Bush’s recount case in 2000, said the Trump campaign's legal strategy looks amateurish and disjointed. “This is just purely outlandish stuff,” Richard said. “But we have an outlandish president. So I guess this makes sense.”
He said Trump’s campaign faces a huge challenge. To succeed, he said, the president would have to show that fraud or irregularities not only existed, but in such a large amount that the election needed to be invalidated in the select state.

Trump’s campaign and his supporters are continuing to push on with more lawsuits, leading veteran election law lawyers like Kenneth Gross to speculate that he’s using the lawsuits to raise money or process the grief of his loss.
 
Well... again - the court cases are irrelevant- they’re there to keep the electoral fraud story alive long enough for a plausible excuse for Republican legislators to ignore the popular vote and appoint Trump friendly representatives to the electoral college to vote on the next president.

Also - I have a conspiracy theory for his back up plan for when Thisbe plan doesn’t work.

Trump will resign before his Presidential term finishes - probably complaining that he can’t continue due to the “fraud”.

This means Pence gets sworn in as President for a short time - and allows Pence confer some sort of Presidential immunity on Trump for the currently outstanding and potential cases against him (Fraud, tax evasion, obstruction of justice, etc) - Forbes which he currently has Presidential immunity but lapses once he’s out of office.

He can grant ongoing immunity to himself... only a sitting President can - so he’ll need Pence to do it.

Otherwise - he’s going to jail for the rest of his life so if he looses this election (which he has).

He doesn’t have the money to pay top attorneys to defend him - hence why few currently are.
 
b050b5c31bbd9b3d42d4cf19109ffc8c.jpg
 


Go team Ross and Dantes!


The fake news reported on a court case, and from the tone of their article it definitely sounds like it's good for you, no need to read the filings or read the judgement, nah, you should be jumping for joy!

Meanwhile some poor guy struggling to make ends meet needs a higher paying job, or just any job. Let's think through what this means for him. Put all the socialist tax and trade policies to one side, we don't need to rape this poor bastard again over those things. But the law firm withdrawing from a case due to cancel culture and politics. What do you suppose that means? It means a business that is or was looking to move to that poor guys town, will now wonder about its legal risks. Imagine getting your store looted by BLM protestors, or getting defamed by BLM activists, or getting defrauded by BLM itself, or a climate change group, or other left wing movement. What happens? You need to sue. To recover the damage incurred on your business. Except law firms no longer want to represent you due to the "sensitive nature" of the claim. You either drop the case or scrape the bottom of the barrel for a lawyer. The business will add this risk onto the growing pile of other risks of doing business in america. And decide nah fuck it, let's go some place else. So that poor bastard struggling to feed his kids will be frying rat burgers. These silly things you cheer for have consequences. Not for the rich. Trump couldn't care less. The business owner couldn't care less. I suspect you couldn't care less either.
 
I was merely trying to make Hansern think for himself and therefore be a bit wiser about things in the future. I estimate a 98% probability of failure.
 
The latest:

State law in the critical Maricopa county in Arizona is that you have to sample 2% of the precincts when you do the hand audit, and make sure it matches up to the dominion voting systems count, before you can certify them as accurate. They've done that and found no issues. In comes the court case, the maricopa country recorder didn't sample 2% of the 750 precincts. The county uses vote centres where people from lots precincts converge upon. There's only 150 of those, and he sampled 2% of those. Which is 3. Instead of 15 if he went by precinct. The republican party wants him to redo the audit by precinct as per the law. The defence is I have a manual (which I made myself, where I say vote centres are the same thing as precincts, so it's fine). The democrat party has applied to intervene in this case and help to defend it.

Why would the democrats spend money in a court case that had nothing to do with them, to prevent a larger sample of votes being audited?
 
Seems all this baseless evidence has stemmed from yes you have guessed it.. conspiracy theories on Facebook..

Pattern emerging here.

Tell a lie, spread the lie, use it support the lie

 
All these daffydaviths don't seem like decent ethidence after all.

The case they lost where those affidavits were filed was in a local court, brought by a private citizen (funded by Trump). The affidavits refer to the voting centres in city, which is why the judge in that case dismissed it as irrelevant as they were not the place this guy turned up to watch/vote. So he lost the case because it was his word of what he though he saw in that polling station, against the word of several officials working there.
 
I was merely trying to make Hansern think for himself and therefore be a bit wiser about things in the future. I estimate a 98% probability of failure.

After going through my polls, graphs and calculations. My estimate is a 100 % probability of continuing to laugh my tits off at you and Ross in this thread.
 
The case they lost where those affidavits were filed was in a local court, brought by a private citizen (funded by Trump). The affidavits refer to the voting centres in city, which is why the judge in that case dismissed it as irrelevant as they were not the place this guy turned up to watch/vote. So he lost the case because it was his word of what he though he saw in that polling station, against the word of several officials working there.

No, tons of the affidavits were thrown out because they were seen as spam, having been harvested through Facebook and not fact checked.
 
No, tons of the affidavits were thrown out because they were seen as spam, having been harvested through Facebook and not fact checked.

And Trump can redraft them and refile them in a second, third and fourth litigation.
 
Back
Top Bottom