I bet you believe he colluded with Russia
Big D vs Twitter
- Thread starter Mors
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
I bet you believe he colluded with Russia
Mass mail in voting wasn't so heavily pushed, because this is the first time in human history that we're being told not to be within 10 meters of each other and to wear a mask.
There's no big conspiracy here dantes.
Get over it. Big D is currently losing under the current system of voting they've got. Not the fairest, but the current agreed system that all parties agreed to.
You wouldn't be floating any of these conspiracy theories, if your team wasn't losing here.
Are you saying this is the first election where mail in voting was an option?
Lol. What a random, unnecessary strawman statement.
Stay on topic Rosco and address his actual message if you disagree with it.
I don't disagree with it. I'm merely pointing out that if you think it's only Trump pulling the wool over people's eyes you're a complete fucking idiot.
But the enlightened Biden supporters are too full of themselves to admit they've been misled in exactly the same fashion as Trump has misled.
Feel free to address whether it's appropriate for DNC members to own the company supplying the voting software any time you like.
The first where it was an option for everyone, hence "mass mail in voting". This could have been used any time before now, and you're all dancing around the reason it has not been.
Social scientists are bad at science, but they don't often make up stories and then publish them.
He was talking about the same thing (voter fraud) in 2012 (before the votes then; before mass mail-in voting). Funny how he didn't put in any lawsuits when he eventually won.
This is the literal definition of "getting in the excuses early."
I'm pretty sure you can find suspicious stuff on both sides if you look hard enough. But the Biden supporters aren't looking for conspiracies right now.
You can argue that's because they're winning. Or maybe it's because they don't have a twitter-ranting, conspiracy theorist leading them in choir.
Or maybe it's both.
They've ran those conspiracies for three years now.
And they sounded equally as deluded when they did it.
Donald Trump won in 2012 as he found a niche in the market. He portrayed himself as an outsider. He was a protest vote for failed politicians. People gave him a chance to see if he would "drain the swamp". He was also up against the most dislikable, uncharismatic creature-cum-career-politician in Hillary Clinton. And even then, he just about won in many states.
Unfortunately, he failed in his primary objective and has made the swamp even bigger. His twitter ranting has brought great shame to the country. Their country is more divided and more of a mess than ever. Never have we seen such vitriol and bile between two sides.
The country needs peace and calm. And lying, senile Joe Biden is just about the perfect candidate for that. He'll have the presidency but not the Senate, meaning he won't be able to get shit through, without heavily compromising.
He can then turn around and shrug to the progressive left and blame the Republicans when none of that agenda goes through (none of which he wants anyway). And he will give tax cuts to the wealthy, when trying to keep his own donors happy and do all the fracking he once said he was against.
What I find remarkable is Republicans are actually getting a Republican as President and yet they're still not happy.
Not sure why any Democrat should or would be celebrating a Joe Biden presidency.
I didn't really catch most of those RGB lady passing away and this Amy lady taking her place.
But messages like this make it extremely difficult for her and clearly makes her job tougher.
For the record if there are Dems wearing Biden Harris masks on site counting them yes they could well be accused of those shenanigans as mentioned. No evidence they have or they did but yes that doesn't make sense.
Also to have zero republican reps witnessing makes it a bit odd agreed.
Alternatively why were volunteer lawyers on the ground before the election?
What was the issue then?
Re Ross point is it appropriate re Pelosi..
Good point if true, agree it maybe isn't appropriate.. is it illegal? Does she have influence over it?
You'd image if it was an issue there's be some public eyebrows raised.
It's similar here though, there was all this stuff about Nadeem Zahawi being owner of a polling comp and then the issue that created.. doubt he has some kinda influence on it.. and if he did well there's others to pick from go ahead.
There's been issues re the counting before heck it's hundreds of millions of votes there's gonna be some issues...doesn't mean there's some underhanded counted going on.
Good point if true, agree it maybe isn't appropriate.. is it illegal? Does she have influence over it?
You'd image if it was an issue there's be some public eyebrows raised.
It's similar here though, there was all this stuff about Nadeem Zahawi being owner of a polling comp and then the issue that created.. doubt he has some kinda influence on it.. and if he did well there's others to pick from go ahead.
There's been issues re the counting before heck it's hundreds of millions of votes there's gonna be some issues...doesn't mean there's some underhanded counted going on.
Last edited:
If I put a ballot in front of you, could you tell me with 100% certainty the signature was the same as the one on file? Then do it several thousand more times without making a mistake?
There doesn't even need to be fraud. The error rate is inevitable. If the counters rejected 1% and if you adjusted a parameter in the software in how it scans the signature that would make the rejection rate 2%, it makes a critical difference in the states he is issuing proceedings. If the election was tight, then mail in ballots make it literally impossible to prove who won. That's just what happens when you measure votes using statistical distributions instead of someone handing you their god damn vote.
Not to mention the blatant criminal fraud only a naive idiot would assume never happened because there is "no evidence".
Wait what? That's the type of question that should get a lawyer thrown out of bar.
....if he was a lawyer.
He is an imbecile and we have 4 years of evidence. If the opponent wasn't a senile old cunt it wouldn't even be this close.
Trump played from the same book as in last election...emails/laptop content leaked etc.
The petulance he has shown makes him unfit to hold the office at white house.
This is all so obvious to anyone who has two brain cells...
Trump played from the same book as in last election...emails/laptop content leaked etc.
The petulance he has shown makes him unfit to hold the office at white house.
This is all so obvious to anyone who has two brain cells...
He looked tired, he looked defeated.
I found myself think I've literally not heard him speak in ages.. and reminded why cos he talks absolute shit, a tremendous amount of shit.
And having watched Biden the other day.. I had a moment of feeling for Americans until I remembered we have Boris to listen to so we got problems of our own.
I found myself think I've literally not heard him speak in ages.. and reminded why cos he talks absolute shit, a tremendous amount of shit.
And having watched Biden the other day.. I had a moment of feeling for Americans until I remembered we have Boris to listen to so we got problems of our own.
I'm still trying to figure out if his supporters are:
1) wilfully ignorant
2) stupid
3) simply blinded by hate for the other "team"
4) know he's a twat but only care about only their pocket/interests
5) pure anarchists loving the disharmony he causes
6) complete nutters themselves
7) combination of all of the above
I know where I'd firmly put Dantes on this list. Not sure on Rosco though.
I only care about my work, followed by the wealth and health of all other sentient life. The only thing a president does which effects those things, Big D does correctly. Noone else has or likely will ever get that correct. That's it. Not rocket science.
While you puke at the thought of Trump using a biased justice he installed to retain his position, I couldn't care less. You can show me concrete proof he has lost fair and square, in my mind the only moral thing to do is lie to win, I'd even kill Biden to win. Needs of the many.
Unless you want him to stand up and give a lecture on quantum field theory, literally all the possible combinations of words he could use amount to absolute shit. What is this god damn obsession of humans to want to hear their leader speak nice words into a camera? It adds zero value to your life, like read a book instead. I don't get it. He is entertaining to listen to, what more do you want?Biden will put you to sleep of that there is no doubt.
Similar threads
