• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

We're up to 281,000 covid deaths under Biden in less than a year whilst having multiple a highly effective vaccines at his disposal. Absolute clowns both of them.

Is it vaccinated or unvaccinated people dying?
 
Is it vaccinated or unvaccinated people dying?

That's for the other thread. In this thread we're concerned with deaths under trump with no vaccines available, compared to deaths under biden with many vaccines and allegedly even treatments available. 400,000 v 281,000. If you compared that in terms of whatever the xG equivalent for deaths is, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that you fucked up royally by electing a dementia patient.
 
Of course whaddapie whose stupid woke vote is partially responsible for actually killing people, gets to virtue signal about how he's a good person because he has good feelings and stands with the murder victim, whilst I'm a monster. You know the word which describes that, I probably don't need to say it again. But I will. You woke fool, lap up that blood that's on your hands, lap it up good.
 
Ah "reports". So things being reported demonstrates to you that both motives simultaneously drove the killer? Because they were reported... christ. I assume you're just trying to save face with these mental gymnastics.

A report of a report of a report was enough for you to swing wildly from one dumb opinion to another.
 
That's for the other thread. In this thread we're concerned with deaths under trump with no vaccines available, compared to deaths under biden with many vaccines and allegedly even treatments available. 400,000 v 281,000. If you compared that in terms of whatever the xG equivalent for deaths is, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that you fucked up royally by electing a dementia patient.

Where to start?

I fucked up electing who?

More dead under Trump?

Vaccinations working or not?

Dead vaccinated or not?

What made up numbers would you prefer to focus on again?

Which one has dementia - is it the one who put his trousers on back to front, wears a man nappy, suggested injecting yourself with bleach, bombing storms, UFO’s and planes during the US Civil War... or the other guy?

Whichever thread you prefer?
 
That's for the other thread. In this thread we're concerned with deaths under trump with no vaccines available, compared to deaths under biden with many vaccines and allegedly even treatments available. 400,000 v 281,000. If you compared that in terms of whatever the xG equivalent for deaths is, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that you fucked up royally by electing a dementia patient.
It also doesn't take a fool to know that if Trump was in office that figure would likely be at least 3 times higher, the CDC disbanded and masks banned from use in public. And there's you assuming that under that utter fool it could be lower. FFS.
 
Is it vaccinated or unvaccinated people dying?

I know Fakemaster believes it's a pandemic of the unvaccinated - which was true in January 2020 before most got vaccinated. (It's like when Everton won the league last September. )

He keeps repeating that phrase despite all the contradictory statistics for the last 7 months.

I don't know what news you have been brainwashed by lately but do you believe it's only or mainly the unvaccinated dying ?
 
A report of a report of a report was enough for you to swing wildly from one dumb opinion to another.

The snippets of a report of a report of a report contained precisely the same information that you obtained above, from your well research reports. That's the first thing. The second thing is that both reports can't be true, so you have to swing from one to another, if you have a functioning brain. It's quite surreal seeing you try to work them and make them fit so that they can both be true. All I can think is you're pissed at me and want to prove me wrong, or you're pissed that within five minutes it was proved the murder had nothing to do with trump and want to continue pretending it did. Who knows.
 
It also doesn't take a fool to know that if Trump was in office that figure would likely be at least 3 times higher, the CDC disbanded and masks banned from use in public. And there's you assuming that under that utter fool it could be lower. FFS.

Lol I'm assuming? Ok, sure.
 
Where to start?

I fucked up electing who?

More dead under Trump?

Vaccinations working or not?

Dead vaccinated or not?

What made up numbers would you prefer to focus on again?

Which one has dementia - is it the one who put his trousers on back to front, wears a man nappy, suggested injecting yourself with bleach, bombing storms, UFO’s and planes during the US Civil War... or the other guy?

Whichever thread you prefer?

Start at the top.

You elected no one. So 'you' doesn't refer to you.

More dead. Less xG. I'm sure I mentioned xG in the post. Although it's only two letters, easy to overlook if your reading skills aren't the best.

See other thread.

See other thread.

400,000 and it's 282,000 now since I last typed.

Consult a medical text for the symptoms for dementia.

No preference.
 
I know Fakemaster believes it's a pandemic of the unvaccinated - which was true in January 2020 before most got vaccinated. (It's like when Everton won the league last September. )

He keeps repeating that phrase despite all the contradictory statistics for the last 7 months.

I don't know what news you have been brainwashed by lately but do you believe it's only or mainly the unvaccinated dying ?

I don’t follow the figures in the US closely - hence why I asked.

Feel free to give some detail - I presume you’re peddling the line that’s it’s mostly vaccinated that are dying in line with your nonsense about vaccines causing the virus to spread more quickly.

I can tell you that in Australia it’s mostly unvaccinated that are dying - and almost entirely unvaccinated that are in ICU.
 
I know Fakemaster believes it's a pandemic of the unvaccinated - which was true in January 2020 before most got vaccinated. (It's like when Everton won the league last September. )

He keeps repeating that phrase despite all the contradictory statistics for the last 7 months.

I don't know what news you have been brainwashed by lately but do you believe it's only or mainly the unvaccinated dying ?

Where am I repeating that phrase?

It's mostly vaccinated people dying, in places where the elderly are overwhelmingly vaccinated. Those places also have almost an order of magnitude less death per caseload, because the vaccines are effective.

In places where even a significant minority of elderly aren't vaccinated, that group contributes the most death, because they are almost an order of magnitude more at risk.
 
I have never, ever encountered anybody who revels so gleefully and ostentatiously in being an utterly miserable, repugnant, despicable cunt, thoroughly devoid of a single redeeming feature... It genuinely terrifies me that I will soon be sending my daughters out into a world where people like you exist and breed.
 
I have never, ever encountered anybody who revels so gleefully and ostentatiously in being an utterly miserable, repugnant, despicable cunt, thoroughly devoid of a single redeeming feature... It genuinely terrifies me that I will soon be sending my daughters out into a world where people like you exist and breed.

The world with an incredibly well armed terrorist state? That the world you mean? The world that only exists because you used your righteous feelings to wish for a better world? You're an idiot. Your daughter will be educated by more idiots. That should be what concerns you, instead of your righteous feelings imagining big bad dantes boogie monsters are real things.
 
You managed to spare any thoughts for the kid who is now dead after falling out of a plane? Or the kids who got blown up by your president so that he could appease your feelings? Any thoughts for those kids you condemned to their unnecessary deaths?
 
Start at the top.

You elected no one. So 'you' doesn't refer to you.

More dead. Less xG. I'm sure I mentioned xG in the post. Although it's only two letters, easy to overlook if your reading skills aren't the best.

See other thread.

See other thread.

400,000 and it's 282,000 now since I last typed.

Consult a medical text for the symptoms for dementia.

No preference.

So why mention “you” - pretty random- but I’ll remember if I ever use it - I can just claim... I didn’t mean you.

Very good - your xG stuff... made up nonsense- without the figures- got it.

You brought up the COVID death figure in this thread comparing with and without vaccines- then decided you didn’t want to talk about vaccines.

So confirmed - more dead under Trump.

Memory loss, loss of motor function, disorientation, Behavioural changes, paranoia, disorganisation, agitation, hallucinations, inappropriate sexual actions, cognitive decline, apathy and withdrawal, difficulty with abstract facts and concentration.

Yep - Trumps a full house.
 
So why mention “you” - pretty random- but I’ll remember if I ever use it - I can just claim... I didn’t mean you.

Very good - your xG stuff... made up nonsense- without the figures- got it.

You brought up the COVID death figure in this thread comparing with and without vaccines- then decided you didn’t want to talk about vaccines.

So confirmed - more dead under Trump.

Memory loss, loss of motor function, disorientation, Behavioural changes, paranoia, disorganisation, agitation, hallucinations, inappropriate sexual actions, cognitive decline, apathy and withdrawal, difficulty with abstract facts and concentration.

Yep - Trumps a full house.

Well that's why you're not a doctor. I mentioned vaccines because Trumps death total needs to be viewed in light of having no vaccines, so xG instead of just G. I assumed you'd get that analogy, you have no hope of calculating it using anything else since the variables are too complex. Likewise Biden's death total needs to be viewed in light of having vaccines. That's why I mentioned vaccines.

If you want to discuss the vaccine statistics, scroll through the other thread.
 
The snippets of a report of a report of a report contained precisely the same information that you obtained above, from your well research reports. That's the first thing. The second thing is that both reports can't be true, so you have to swing from one to another, if you have a functioning brain. It's quite surreal seeing you try to work them and make them fit so that they can both be true. All I can think is you're pissed at me and want to prove me wrong, or you're pissed that within five minutes it was proved the murder had nothing to do with trump and want to continue pretending it did. Who knows.

I knew both pieces of information, and both potential motivations immediately, because I read about the incident. You didn't, and had to wait for other people to present them to you third hand.

Because you did this, you revealed two different wholly incompatible arguments. In the one you say that of course a violent trump supporter will be antagonized by a differing political partisan. (A guy targets someone based on having a trump effigy and a Biden sign)

In the other you say it wasn't political, the guy had beliefs in satanism and was strongly anti abortion. He didn't kill them because he saw their lawn sign.

Both of these are based on the same reports of his affidavit. You think that the reporting on this affadavit is suspect when it doesn't fit your new opinion. Two facts going toward motivation are presented, with equal sourcing, and you prejudice one. You even constitute one of the reports as fact checking the other, when they are sourced from the same reports of the same document.

The most logical thing to assume about this story is that there was a loony who was a trump supporter, who conflated his own mentally ill delusions, with politics and religion. This isn't rare. Rare is that he's willing to murder people, which, with typical lack of impulse control he did. So he's on location documenting the abortion rituals that take place in a park. He likely thinks they take place there because what he sees as pro abortionist satanist signs are around the park. He sees a trump lynching and Biden sign on one of the houses he's already scouting, and opportunistically enters and kills someone. What crazy mental gymnastics I had to do to get to that narrative. Ta da!
 
Well that's why you're not a doctor. I mentioned vaccines because Trumps death total needs to be viewed in light of having no vaccines, so xG instead of just G. I assumed you'd get that analogy, you have no hope of calculating it using anything else since the variables are too complex. Likewise Biden's death total needs to be viewed in light of having vaccines. That's why I mentioned vaccines.

If you want to discuss the vaccine statistics, scroll through the other thread.

Sorry... when you say “you” - do you mean me or someone else?
 
I knew both pieces of information, and both potential motivations immediately, because I read about the incident. You didn't, and had to wait for other people to present them to you third hand.

Yes. I'm not interested enough in the murder to go and read about it. I'm only interested in what can be inferred from it.

Because you did this, you revealed two different wholly incompatible arguments. In the one you say that of course a violent trump supporter will be antagonized by a differing political partisan. (A guy targets someone based on having a trump effigy and a Biden sign)

In the other you say it wasn't political, the guy had beliefs in satanism and was strongly anti abortion. He didn't kill them because he saw their lawn sign.

Yes I know the arguments are incompatible, because they were based on two different motives for the murder. Secondly, no, I never said "of course a violent trump supporter will be atagonized". You made that up. What I said was trump supporters own guns, when you piss them off, you can't be surprised when you get shot. Not shot by all 70 million of them. I mean shot by the handful of them that are mentally ill. That was then replaced with the satanic argument, and blaming the lack of law enforcement.

Both of these are based on the same reports of his affidavit. You think that the reporting on this affadavit is suspect when it doesn't fit your new opinion. Two facts going toward motivation are presented, with equal sourcing, and you prejudice one. You even constitute one of the reports as fact checking the other, when they are sourced from the same reports of the same document.

The most logical thing to assume about this story is that there was a loony who was a trump supporter, who conflated his own mentally ill delusions, with politics and religion. This isn't rare. Rare is that he's willing to murder people, which, with typical lack of impulse control he did. So he's on location documenting the abortion rituals that take place in a park. He likely thinks they take place there because what he sees as pro abortionist satanist signs are around the park. He sees a trump lynching and Biden sign on one of the houses he's already scouting, and opportunistically enters and kills someone. What crazy mental gymnastics I had to do to get to that narrative. Ta da!

I don't give a shit about the reporting, or the murder. The first snippet stated there was a murder of someone because they voted for biden. The second snippet stated that it was because they were satan worshippers. Your narrative is nonsensical. First you pull a bunch of assumptions out of nowhere, then you start declaring what this guy was seeing and what he was thinking.

He killed them for being satan worshippers. If he saw the biden sign, then figured that biden voters are more likely to be satan worshippers, that isn't the narrative we're discussing. You've just cleverly changed the narrative and reached for a way to make the biden sign important to the story. He did not kill them because they were biden voters, even on your own narrative. This is now beyond mental gymnastics, you're totally delusional.
 
Yes. I'm not interested enough in the murder to go and read about it.

If you aren't interested enough in something to read about it, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

First you pull a bunch of assumptions out of nowhere, then you start declaring what this guy was seeing and what he was thinking.

He killed them for being satan worshippers.

Dantes, ladies and gentleman.
 
I have never, ever encountered anybody who revels so gleefully and ostentatiously in being an utterly miserable, repugnant, despicable cunt, thoroughly devoid of a single redeeming feature... It genuinely terrifies me that I will soon be sending my daughters out into a world where people like you exist and breed.

Dantes doesn't breed mate -
 
We should all just stop posting in it but its just too brightly burning a dumpster fire, and we're too stupid not to stare at it.

It's probably my fault for posting that slurpee meme, but it made me laugh.
Your wife has any cool foods before Yom Kippur?
I made some traditional stuff for post fast (roska, pepitada) and the usual lemon chicken stuff to kick us off.
 
If you aren't interested enough in something to read about it, SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Dantes, ladies and gentleman.


Christ. I read the snippet, which stated that a murder happened and why it happened. Those are the only two bits of information I need to infer the things I am interested in. Ruban provided it. I don't need to read it again elsewhere. I don't need to read what the guys name is, his life story, the date it happened, his legal defence. You seem to think I should have wasted my time studying a murder for what reason? To make you happy? You're just talking shit because you know the two motives are mutually exclusive and can't bring yourself to admit your mistake.
 
Back
Top Bottom