• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

I don't think the usa is going to vote for hunter after this, if it's all true.

Maybe dante is right, maybe a shiny object will titilate them and their moral outrage will drive them to the alternative, the guy who cheated on his wife while she was pregnant and paid a porn star a hundred thousand dollars from a slush fund. The guy that asked foreign powers to investigate his rivals.

Maybe they won't vote the guy out who never bothered coming up with any national response to a pandemic, because he can't pay attention to anything for longer than 2 days, and has no managerial ability. Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

But nothing in that stupid graph you've posted shows me anything. And, for someone who rails about the perversion of science constantly, your internet habit of going to Imright.com and posting whatever dumb shit pops up is odd. In this case, you've found a nice way of introducing the concept of correlation vs causation to a 12 year old. And it's from a tool sophisticated enough to competently establish behavior, too, if used properly.

Right now very few people are talking about hunter biden emails outside of a group of voters that were already going to vote for him. And, unless that changes, what you need to look at is whether it alters voter enthusiasm. Indeed, in general that's what you need to look at with trump, who mostly campaigns to his base.

Right now, oddly most people seem to be focused on the very thing that trump tries to move on from constantly; coronavirus. It continues to spread in his administration, who don't take recommended steps to stop it. Trump caught it after endangering others by lack of compliance and inadequate testing, and was hospitalized. He models the worst behavior. And now the us and much of the western world is skyrocketing to record case numbers. Meanwhile mark meadows is out there saying the quiet part out loud, that they aren't attempting to control the pandemic, which is what we've seen, a total abdication in the hope of political gain. For some odd reason that thing everyone thinks about all the fucking time, the reason I won't have seen my 80 year old parents for a year, that's quite important to people right now. And the vast majority of people no matter his sales, no matter his pitches, know he has done a horrible job.

Oh I'm more than happy to shit upon correlation, even more so when there is causation. In that case you're just a cunt for choosing to "study" the correlation as a stupid indirect way to excuse yourself from having to do some actual studying of the causation itself.

On that point, the causation between who the president is and the welfare of the citizens breaks down as follows:
How polite they are - none
Their views on race - none
Their corruption - none
Their history of abusing young girls - none
Their statesmen like demeanour - none
Their relationships with other world leaders - none
Their haircut - none
Their habit of lying - none
Their insults and abuse of enemies - none
Their embarrassingly bad tan - none
Their paedophile son - none
Their association with Epstein - none
Their tax bills - none
Their delusional attempt to control a pandemic by taking x/y/z action early, late or never, whenever - none
Their failure to take the pandemic seriously and downplay it in the media - none
Their policy of reducing the trade deficit with china - highly positive
Their policy of lower taxes and regulations - highly positive
Their policy to transition the energy industry into oblivion - highly negative
Their policy to tax everything you earn - highly negative
 
Perhaps the search result of 'can i change my vote' included 'destroy the original ballot by any means necessary' which ain't wrong to be fair.
 
Oh I'm more than happy to shit upon correlation, even more so when there is causation. In that case you're just a cunt for choosing to "study" the correlation as a stupid indirect way to excuse yourself from having to do some actual studying of the causation itself.

On that point, the causation between who the president is and the welfare of the citizens breaks down as follows:
How polite they are - none
Their views on race - none
Their corruption - none
Their history of abusing young girls - none
Their statesmen like demeanour - none
Their relationships with other world leaders - none
Their haircut - none
Their habit of lying - none
Their insults and abuse of enemies - none
Their embarrassingly bad tan - none
Their paedophile son - none
Their association with Epstein - none
Their tax bills - none
Their delusional attempt to control a pandemic by taking x/y/z action early, late or never, whenever - none
Their failure to take the pandemic seriously and downplay it in the media - none
Their policy of reducing the trade deficit with china - highly positive
Their policy of lower taxes and regulations - highly positive
Their policy to transition the energy industry into oblivion - highly negative
Their policy to tax everything you earn - highly negative



I disagree with much of that, and I could explain why but it would be a waste of time. I thought you had the best graphs Dantes? What happened?
 
I'm losing count of these dantes was right again moments.

2-25.jpeg

If you give a longer period, you can see there's very little correlation, not even taking into account that volumes aren't in this:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=Can i change my vote,Hunter biden china
 
I disagree with much of that, and I could explain why but it would be a waste of time. I thought you had the best graphs Dantes? What happened?

You were misled by my earlier graphs from tradingeconomics.com and other financial data providers. As it comes down to money, those guys obsessively collect any and all imaginable data, so I am spoilt for choice and can select the correct graph that captures to correct mechanics occurring in the economy. I did take care to do that.

With the election and covid and riots and social justice shit, the data collection rigour is somewhat lacking. I have to make do with the only graph available based on the stupid persons collection of stupid data. There's nothing I can do about that, but I do try to imagine what the data I would have liked would likely look like, and go from there. I dare say my brief use of imagination leads to far more stunningly correct predictions than anyone else on earth. Hence all the dantes was right after all shockers I've been pointing out.
 
I wish Joe would stop fucking things up like getting people's names wrong or daydreaming. This election would be a slam dunk if he didn't fuck the simplest of things up. He just needs to shut up and let Obama and his mates do the campaign's and talking.
 
Why would the right win a civil war in the US?

Every reason they didn't win it last time is still in play, and then some. The most right leaning areas in the united states are for poor as fuck, and subsidized by wealthier, largely democratic states. They have worse infrastructure, and less technological know how. They have less power, and they have no navy.
 
Why would the right win a civil war in the US?

Every reason they didn't win it last time is still in play, and then some. The most right leaning areas in the united states are for poor as fuck, and subsidized by wealthier, largely democratic states. They have worse infrastructure, and less technological know how. They have less power, and they have no navy.
They're mainly more gun nutty than the left. Although the blue states tend to have bigger populations, don't they? So perhaps that's balances them out.

I suppose it all depends on which way the army go, although I think a lot of the army types aren't too keen on Trump.
 
Why would the right win a civil war in the US?

Every reason they didn't win it last time is still in play, and then some. The most right leaning areas in the united states are for poor as fuck, and subsidized by wealthier, largely democratic states. They have worse infrastructure, and less technological know how. They have less power, and they have no navy.


But.... they have a Dantes.
 
You forgot that the FBI have had the Biden laptop since last December and an investigation is ongoing.

Much like your doubt that there could be a massive scandal underneath the surface of the Epstein stories you're going to wrong here too.

Hunter will have a massive drugs overdose any day now.


Oh no- I was all for massive Epstein paediatric scandal - just not the full QAnon Killary running it out of a Pizza joint version.
 
I wish Joe would stop fucking things up like getting people's names wrong or daydreaming. This election would be a slam dunk if he didn't fuck the simplest of things up. He just needs to shut up and let Obama and his mates do the campaign's and talking.

A special needs candidate. He is helped by majority of Establishment (former and present), mainstream media, Silicon Valley nerds, Hollywood elite, Antifa/BLM, teleprompters... A sad state of affairs.
 
Oh no- I was all for massive Epstein paediatric scandal - just not the full QAnon Killary running it out of a Pizza joint version.

Another bunch of text messages have been leaked. Hunter bitching to Joe about his sister in law / wife not allowing him to see his niece due to being sexually inappropriate, and Joe Biden giving zero fucks about his granddaughter, and more interested in keeping everything quiet. There's only one way to keep it quiet now.

Eg75B1bXkAcjPTO
 
Hahaha I spoke too soon, if you type the relevant name into twitter, there are now "zero results" returned, the tweeters must have all committed suicide.
 
If I didn't know more about how scientifically inclined you were, I'd think you were a desperate partisan whose only source of news is a giant reinforcing confirmation bias machine, attempting to find some silver bullet to reassure yourself.
 
If I didn't know more about how scientifically inclined you were, I'd think you were a desperate partisan whose only source of news is a giant reinforcing confirmation bias machine, attempting to find some silver bullet to reassure yourself.

The only bias I have is that lower taxes and protectionist trade policies are the right answers. And that's it. It doesn't matter what other information presents itself, Trump could appear on TV with his daughter, and fuck her right in front of everybody in the crowd, I wouldn't like it, but I will still come to the same right answer as before. Feelings can't change that answer. The science I do is about getting the right answer, there are no feelings, but the modern science people like to do now is about being petrified of giving the wrong answer.
 
Oh no, we can't support Trump now because he wants to fuck his daughter! I guess there's nothing for it, let's raise taxes and hand our consumers and businesses over to china. I'm sure it'll be fine, because the causation is now moral, God won't let moral people suffe- oh, oh fuck, well there goes the economy, who'd have thunk it, does anyone know how to cook a decent rat burger?
 
I will miss D and his fake Melanias being rolled out and pretending like we don't have a fucking clue. We know that it's not her Donald. The whole world does
 
Why would the right win a civil war in the US?

Every reason they didn't win it last time is still in play, and then some. The most right leaning areas in the united states are for poor as fuck, and subsidized by wealthier, largely democratic states. They have worse infrastructure, and less technological know how. They have less power, and they have no navy.

Because they're all nutcases with AK47s as opposed to muskets, and the left are all too busy arguing over gender pronouns.

Obviously, I'm half-joking. But the right would win. They've been gearing up for this shit for years.
 
I wasn't being flippant about a civil war. There's a good chunk of the left whose ideology is directly opposed to the US Constitution.
And there's enough on the other side who long for the good old days.
A few more Portlands and it becomes a possibility
 
I wasn't being flippant about a civil war. There's a good chunk of the left whose ideology is directly opposed to the US Constitution.
And there's enough on the other side who long for the good old days.
A few more Portlands and it becomes a possibility


Have you been to portland?
 
Back
Top Bottom