• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

How do you know what to believe ?

Fauci keeps coming out saying things that contradict what he previously said. It's quite obvious that the medical opinions have been tainted by politics all along.

Medical opinion would have had us lock down harder, quicker, with more restrictions and for longer.
 
Medical opinion changes when more scientific data becomes available that clarifies or adjusts your position. That's the whole point of science. It's apolitical. It doesn't matter whether you believe in it or not. It's objective truth based on the best possible information. So in a situation where scientific data is rapidly aggregating and coming in every day, you would, in fact, expect Fauci to change his opinion over time.

As opposed to just weird, unrelenting, bollocks from a couple of twats on the internet.
 
Medical opinion changes when more scientific data becomes available that clarifies or adjusts your position. That's the whole point of science. It's apolitical. It doesn't matter whether you believe in it or not. It's objective truth based on the best possible information. So in a situation where scientific data is rapidly aggregating and coming in every day, you would, in fact, expect Fauci to change his opinion over time.

As opposed to just weird, unrelenting, bollocks from a couple of twats on the internet.

That's not how science works at all. That's how morons work.
 
Medical opinion changes when more scientific data becomes available that clarifies or adjusts your position. That's the whole point of science. It's apolitical. It doesn't matter whether you believe in it or not. It's objective truth based on the best possible information. So in a situation where scientific data is rapidly aggregating and coming in every day, you would, in fact, expect Fauci to change his opinion over time.

As opposed to just weird, unrelenting, bollocks from a couple of twats on the internet.

You're making as assumption that his opinions are based on the science, but he's a proven liar already.

The unrelenting bollocks comes from people like you who lack critical thinking faculties.

For example - see how the lab leak news has unfolded. The mad conspiracy theorists were right from the beginning.
 
Its whatever Fauci says = science.

If you criticism him you're a racist.

Have I got it right ?

Yeah, there's been a lot of this during the pandemic. Any suggestion of trying to question something that doesn't seem right or add up, and you're ostracized and shunned from society, labelled a racist, anti-science loon. Science constantly asks questions and tries to disprove previously held assumptions until they're undeniable. That's not what's been happening over the last 18 months or so.
 
You're making as assumption that his opinions are based on the science, but he's a proven liar already.

The unrelenting bollocks comes from people like you who lack critical thinking faculties.

For example - see how the lab leak news has unfolded. The mad conspiracy theorists were right from the beginning.
You're making the assumption that he's not making decisions based on science and you don't have a single shred of evidence that he isn't.

The hilarious thing about all of this is how you consume all of the least credible sources of information that can possibly be imagined, and then make the assumption that this means you have "critical thinking faculties". When in fact it means you have the gullibility and thinking capability of a child who still believes in Father Christmas.

Rosco: "But. . . but. . . he's real. I know he's real! He ate all the biscuits!"

You probably think that the fact that you're alive proves Santa shagged your mum.
 
You're making the assumption that he's not making decisions based on science and you don't have a single shred of evidence that he isn't.

The hilarious thing about all of this is how you consume all of the least credible sources of information that can possibly be imagined, and then make the assumption that this means you have "critical thinking faculties". When in fact it means you have the gullibility and thinking capability of a child who still believes in Father Christmas.

Rosco: "But. . . but. . . he's real. I know he's real! He ate all the biscuits!"

You probably think that the fact that you're alive proves Santa shagged your mum.

The problem is the biggest idiot here, in your mind, has been correct about things that you got wrong.

Does that not make you the fucking idiot ?
 
Yeah, there's been a lot of this during the pandemic. Any suggestion of trying to question something that doesn't seem right or add up, and you're ostracized and shunned from society, labelled a racist, anti-science loon. Science constantly asks questions and tries to disprove previously held assumptions until they're undeniable. That's not what's been happening over the last 18 months or so.

See above from Dirty Sanchez as an example

Moderna's janitor is very offended.
 
Talk about echo chambers in here. You've got dumb and dumber just winking and touching their noses at each other thinking that they've outsmarted everyone and knowing something that no-one else can possibly know. Two fucking lunatics that exactly encapsulate the problem with the world at large.

Rosco and Dantes - SCMs microcosm of all the world's weird, creepy, stupid cunts.
 
2ee8cb8ebeba304bc9f13a986ba171f2.jpg
 
Talk about echo chambers in here. You've got dumb and dumber just winking and touching their noses at each other thinking that they've outsmarted everyone and knowing something that no-one else can possibly know. Two fucking lunatics that exactly encapsulate the problem with the world at large.

Rosco and Dantes - SCMs microcosm of all the world's weird, creepy, stupid cunts.

At least we don't pretend to be scientists on the internet.
 
At least we don't pretend to be scientists on the internet.
Again - point me to the post where I claimed to be a scientist? Bring it, creep.

With every single exaggerated / misquoted / misinterpreted statement you make, you just offer greater evidence that you have zero capacity to interpret anything more complex than a Dick and Jane book.

You're utterly full of shit, you fucking bellend.
 
The United States won their bronze-medal match Thursday in the Tokyo Olympics, but former President Donald Trump attacked the team for failing to take home the gold, claiming they are “headed by a radical group of Leftist Maniacs” and that America “should replace the wokesters with Patriots.”

After losing to Canada in the semifinals, the U.S. bounced back on Thursday, capturing the bronze medal by defeating Australia 4-3.
Shortly after the victory, Trump released a vitriolic statement lashing out at Team USA, arguing, “They would have won the Gold Medal instead of the Bronze” if they weren’t “woke.”

Trump stated, “Woke means you lose, everything that is woke goes bad, and our soccer team certainly has.”
The former president concluded his statement by taking aim at American superstar Megan Rapinoe, calling her “the woman with the purple hair” and saying she “played terribly,” despite the fact she netted two huge goals and was the game’s leading scorer.
 
Good on Trump, rather than focussing on non critical issues like global warming, covid and the economy, he carries on with his war on girl scouts.
Go Trump 2024...
 
Trump tiggered your feelings gain? Biden triggered a third wave, a border crisis, war in the middle east, civil war in afghanistan, eye watering inflation, eye watering homicide rates, as well as multiple crimes against language, but hey at least your feelings are in a safer space.
 
Back
Top Bottom