• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

The New York attorney general's office says it is investigating the Trump Organization "in a criminal capacity".

A spokesman for the state's top prosecutor, Letitia James, said the inquiry into Mr Trump's property company was "no longer purely civil". Ms James has been scrutinising the ex-Republican president's financial dealings before he took office. The Trumps deny wrongdoing and say the inquiry by a Democratic prosecutor is a political vendetta.

Ms James' spokesman, Fabien Levy, told the BBC on Tuesday: "We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the Organization is no longer purely civil in nature. "We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA. We have no additional comment."

Love to see it !

Awaits Dantes' rabid defence with interest.
 
Translation: Trumps lawyers and accountants are not as stupid as I am, which is why they work for him and I work for the state. They covered their tracks and I've come to the realisation that I'm going to get my ass handed to me, which I should have known from the beginning. To save face, I'm going to make wild accusations that they did indeed shock horror... cover their tracks, and then delude myself into thinking the DA will find proof of this, because I'm stupid. Yeah, now let me write a letter to Trump to make myself feel big time, and give a copy to the fake news whilst I'm at it.


You love to see it.
 
DA: mr president, did you order the code red!!!!???
Trump: you're god damn right I.... plead the fifth.... lol you fucking moron, are we done here, I have golf in an hour?
DA: fuck
 
The New York attorney general's office says it is investigating the Trump Organization "in a criminal capacity".

A spokesman for the state's top prosecutor, Letitia James, said the inquiry into Mr Trump's property company was "no longer purely civil". Ms James has been scrutinising the ex
-Republican president's financial dealings before he took office. The Trumps deny wrongdoing and say the inquiry by a Democratic prosecutor is a political vendetta.

Ms James' spokesman, Fabien Levy, told the BBC on Tuesday: "We have informed the Trump Organization that our investigation into the Organization is no longer purely civil in nature. "We are now actively investigating the Trump Organization in a criminal capacity, along with the Manhattan DA. We have no additional comment."

Love to see it !

Awaits Dantes' rabid defence with interest.
The white text was spot on then 🙂
 
Update for Rosco and Dantes:
  • Moderna stock price November 3, 2020 (when orange baby-man got his ass handed to him) $69.08 USD
  • Moderna stock price May 19, 2021 (sun is shining, and the birds are singing) $159.53 USD
An astonishing gain of more than 130% in just over 6 months. What was your question again?

No wonder you two embarrassing helmets are nothing but a waste of your dad's spunk.
 
Hahahaa you should have sold it and put the money into crude oil when I told you. Going back in time to before the vaccine announcement to make yourself feel better isn't going to help the fact you've had a bad quarter. In other news, you enjoying the fruits of bidenomics yet? I did tell you so. You love to see it.
 
Maybe Dantes could outline the hardships he’s suffered since Biden took office.
 
The only thing I suffer is mathematics. Maybe the children being killed in the gaza strip and the children being raped at the mexican border puts that hardship into perspective.
 
42sb5ev8wn171.jpg
 
What is the source of this information? Another one of your mentally deficient buddies?

If you're so confident that Dominion made these errors purposefully, and it affected the outcome of the election, then why don't you contest it with them? Go on - make a name for yourself. Not so confident now?

Why did Newsmax settle really fucking quickly with Dominion? Why are there still billion dollar lawsuits against your sheep herder nutter buddies - Sydney Powell, and Rudy Guiliani? Both of whom now posit a formal legal defense that, "no reasonable person would have believed their claims". This right here is all you really need to know that they, like you, are just a bunch of helmets unconcerned with the truth.

Finally, you do realize that a "sheep" is someone who reads bollocks on the Internet, and completely believes it - without any thought for the credibility of the source, or the requirement for any compelling evidence? After all this time, months and months, this is the sum of your evidence? You previously believed this all in the absence of this new evidence, because some twat on the internet told you to?

The total irony of your "sheep" reference is as unsurprising as it is laughable. Honestly, you have the mentality of a small child who thinks fairies are real, because mummy said so.

You utterly dull, QAnon twat.
 
For the love of fucking god, what is so difficult about the legal meaning of "statement of fact" that is so frustratingly impossible for you to grasp?
 
What is the source of this information? Another one of your mentally deficient buddies?

If you're so confident that Dominion made these errors purposefully, and it affected the outcome of the election, then why don't you contest it with them? Go on - make a name for yourself. Not so confident now?

Why did Newsmax settle really fucking quickly with Dominion? Why are there still billion dollar lawsuits against your sheep herder nutter buddies - Sydney Powell, and Rudy Guiliani? Both of whom now posit a formal legal defense that, "no reasonable person would have believed their claims". This right here is all you really need to know that they, like you, are just a bunch of helmets unconcerned with the truth.

Finally, you do realize that a "sheep" is someone who reads bollocks on the Internet, and completely believes it - without any thought for the credibility of the source, or the requirement for any compelling evidence? After all this time, months and months, this is the sum of your evidence? You previously believed this all in the absence of this new evidence, because some twat on the internet told you to?

The total irony of your "sheep" reference is as unsurprising as it is laughable. Honestly, you have the mentality of a small child who thinks fairies are real, because mummy said so.

You utterly dull, QAnon twat.

It is from a US Senate report.
 
That Dominions software keeps making mistakes in favour of Democrats ?

Yes. That's one of their staff quoted as admitting it.
 
Well everyone was inexplicably petrified and mortally offended by the merest idea of performing some basic bits of research or investigation to determine what was true. God forbid that they counted some numbers, the humanity, oh the humanity, think of the children, like jesus fucking christ what else can you say, counting is right up there with genocide in how depraved it is, it makes my skin crawl to think of human beings counting stuff. I for one thank the lord in heaven that they managed to prevent those evil monsters from doing the counting of things, we can now all sleep at night, for the small price of having no idea what the truth is.
 
You despicable racist! It seems to me that dominion have self-identified as being prone to human error, and so we have to respect their truth, and indeed commend their stunning and brave decision to share their truth with us.
 
That Dominions software keeps making mistakes in favour of Democrats ?

Yes. That's one of their staff quoted as admitting it.
Again - a misrepresentation.

The software doesn't "keep making mistakes in favor of democrats". There is not even a shred of credible evidence that Dominion software made any "mistakes" in the Presidential election. The outstanding lawsuits against Powell and Giuliani are more than enough to suggest that I am factually accurate in that statement.

In this specific case - the May 18th primary in a single Pennsylvanian county - the error was on someone mislabeling something. (Although this probably did affect the voting in some way.)

The fact however that Rosco deliberately misrepresented this information as evidence of voter fraud in the Presidential election is ironically fraudulent. When he then stated that it was a US Senate report, he doubled down, and got handed a nice big warm mug of shut-the-fuck-up.

The irony is probably completely lost on the fat cunt.
 
Last edited:
Again - a misrepresentation.

The software doesn't "keep making mistakes in favor of democrats". There is not even a shred of credible evidence that Dominion software made any "mistakes" in the Presidential election. The outstanding lawsuits against Powell and Giuliani are more than enough to suggest that I am factually accurate in that statement.

In this specific case - the May 18th primary in a single Pennsylvanian county - the error was on someone mislabeling something. (Although this probably did affect the voting in some way.)

The fact however that Rosco deliberately misrepresented this information as evidence of voter fraud in the Presidential election is ironically fraudulent. When he then stated that it was a US Senate report, he doubled down, and got handed a nice big warm mug of shut-the-fuck-up.

The irony is probably completely lost on the fat cunt.

Where did I say it was evidence of US presidential election fraud ?

Pretend you're a scientist again and find some evidence supporting your hypothesis
 
Back
Top Bottom