• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

Just to clarify haha. You're clarifying something that appears to be a figment of your imagination.

I believed the affidavit was genuine, because the likelihood of it being falsified was miniscule. You believed it was fake. I then linked the university document with the professor's signature. You then joked about oh wow a match guess it must be real. At this point I couldn't fathom how you could seriously entertain the notion it was forged, without being tremendously dumb.

Then you asked about the affidavit being in English. To again say it's a fake. By now the video was released of the prof reading his affidavit out loud. I guess you now realise it wasn't a fake bit of paper. Still incredible you didn't know this immediately.

So now, your imagination kicks in and you pretend we're arguing about whether the hacker did the thing he has said. We're not. I told you at the start that the affidavit was real, and offered that the hacker could be mentally ill or lying to save his skin. You overlooked that in your clarification. You overlooked it at the time too in order to pointlessly question the source, the paper, the lack of letter headed paper, the lack of Italian language. That's what happened.


No Dantes - the stuff in the affidavit is bullshit.

I’m certain someone typed that shit up and signed it - because photo.

I’ve no idea what your talking about with signatures.

Honestly - the old dude might as well wiped his arse on a piece of toilet paper and held it up saying it’s a statement about the American Presidential Election - at least that would have had artistic merit.
 
No Dantes - the stuff in the affidavit is bullshit.

I’m certain someone typed that shit up and signed it - because photo.

I’ve no idea what your talking about with signatures.

Honestly - the old dude might as well wiped his arse on a piece of toilet paper and held it up saying it’s a statement about the American Presidential Election - at least that would have had artistic merit.

The affidavit refers to a confession that an italian rigged the election. The affidavit is real. The signature and then the video confirm it was real. So that leaves the confession that might be real, or might be bullshit. I've no idea what you're thinking, only what you're typing. But it seems you think the confession is bullshit, and are arguing that therefore the affidavit is bullshit. That is wrong, I've no idea how you can even make that error in your thinking. It's just disturbing that so many people think the way you do. Poorly. Lazily. Carelessly.
 
This is a thread which have shown and continue to show two very weird individuals.

Question: 2 + 2 = 4, would you say that is correct?

Ross: "You are so gullible, its laughingly stupid. Thats what the lizards want you to believe. Proof? Google Enigma and German professor Humperdinck. The Czechs discovered a math cover up by the Germans during WWII, its 5. To suggest 4 is fraudulent to math. Cant find it? Do your own research. The fraud is there and obvious. Its so obvious. Its 5 Check the Enigma, or the Little Nutty professor calculator for kidz."

Dantes: *First you have to imagine that there is a 20% chance it could be 3. There is also a 13% chance it could be 7. If you visualize your math professor having an off day when he was calculating this and his glasses were covered with syrup. He could have written 5. If you look closer to this case his student from '99 signed an affidavit that said the professor said 5, but his glasses were clean. So, when I suit up in court that will result in it being 5 on the base of that ethidence.
There are also the graphs of pencil sales from Kentucky to look at. With there being an increase in sales of the number 5 pencil, that indicates a clear path to that your belief of the number 4 to be incorrect in this math question.
I dont care if its 3, 4 or 6. The signed affidavit says 5. So its 5. Remember that there is a 90% chance the student was correct, and 10% chance that he cant read. Oh look, Pfizer stock are down, and you cant see the correlation. Laughable. You didnt see it. People are selling the stock as their CFO got a C in math, just because he said this was a definite 4. He was suckered by the fake news and the fraudulent math learning books. Big D wouldnt have been. Thats why he says 5."

You thinking abilities are beyond help. There is a 0% chance it could be 3. For a coin, there is a 50% chance it could be tails. You don't understand the difference, and then typed a story out on the assumption that I don't understand it either. Good job.
 
I'll stop now. In fairness I didn't realise how fun debating sources is. I expended zero mental capital, none. So easy, so quick, so decisive. Perhaps I was too harsh on the fact checkers.
It seems strange that you and Ross should be so questioning of other peoples' news sources while accepting, without scrutiny, the musings of far-right nut jobs dug up from the darkest corners of the internet.
 
It seems strange that you and Ross should be so questioning of other peoples' news sources while accepting, without scrutiny, the musings of far-right nut jobs dug up from the darkest corners of the internet.

Not their musings. Their documents, their data analysis, their streams of hearings, and so on. Then I take account of that information because that's what brains do, they process information. The source of the information is not something that requires processing. It just requires a mere thank you to the nut job for gathering it all, saving other people the time and effort.

What you still fail to see is by fixating upon the source, and being brainwashed to get into personal arguments with the source, you now have a situation where the source has been silenced. You now have no more information coming your way in future. All you have are "credible sources" who will tell you something based on their word. You brain can believe what they tell you, or not believe it. Flip a coin. It doesn't matter when the topic is an affidavit. It will certainly matter when the topic is what you should do in the event of a deadly pandemic.
 
Every far right nut job has one thing in common...because on matter dear to their heart and affects them directly they can be far right. But when the shoe is on the other foot they will seek entitlement to liberalism.

They are all a bunch of hypocrites.

This is probably true to the leftist nut jobs as well.
 
How come every far right nut is always going on about anti lockdown, anti vaccine, fraud elections suddenly, free speech, globalization and anti immigration...
Is there a school or twitter follow list you get indoctrinated into?
 
I know why that is. It isn't that hard to figure out. It'd require two graphs, and a paragraph of explanation.
 
Shit just got real for Trump

The Professional Golfer's Association of America has decided to pull the 2022 PGA championships from President Donald Trump's Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club.
 
Go on then?

I was setting that up to tell you to go fuck yourself. I can do it in one graph though. The topics you listed are the issues politicians make the subject of the time. That's why it's those particular things that people take views on.

A long time ago, peoples views were fitted to a normal distribution (red curve). These days, due to a worsening economic situation, people have drifted to the left or right leading to a bimodal distribution (green and blue curve). You don't understand this, so you still assume a normal distribution, then treat huge proportions of the population as extremists. The graph below is probably quite accurate, the people that drift to the left tend to compile information to defend their attacks, so their views narrow down into a tight range. People that drift to the right don't need to gather information to prove their views, so they are more widely distributed as anything goes without challenge or question.


generating-normal-random-variables-part-1_4_0.svg
 
Morons, did they leave the data unencrypted in the event of a breach?
They must have got some really crappy Russian coders.
They had that data breach a few weeks ago and apparently the security was practically non-existent. Of course, there could be all sorts of conspiracies behind it...
 
I was setting that up to tell you to go fuck yourself. I can do it in one graph though. The topics you listed are the issues politicians make the subject of the time. That's why it's those particular things that people take views on.

A long time ago, peoples views were normal distribution (red curve). These days, due to worsening economic situation, people have drifted to the left or right leading to a bimodal distribution (green and blue curve). You don't understand this, so you still assume a normal distribution, then treat huge proportions of the population as extremists. The graph below is probably quite accurate, the people that drift to the left tend to compile information to defend their attacks, so their views narrow down into a tight range. People that drift to the left don't need to gather information to prove their views, so they are more widely distributed as anything goes without challenge or question.


generating-normal-random-variables-part-1_4_0.svg

Ohh, you really are a master of debate.Or should call you Master Bates.

Well thought you were going to come up with some really insightful reasoning but anyway, thanks for trying...
 
Ohh, you really are a master of debate.

Well thought you were going to come up with some really insightful reasoning but anyway, thanks for trying...

It's a simple question with a simple answer. Not my fault you mistook it for some complex mystery because you didn't bother to figure out the answer.
 
Speaking of parler, again, a friend was going to sign up to it (for a laugh, he said) but it asked for your phone number to send a verification code. Fuck that, said he. Looks like me made the right choice.
 
Gets better:



Lol, can’t make it up.
Always surprising when people spend so much time and money on fancy ios and android apps but end up just grabbing off the shelf admin software without security reviews. No one bothered to notice the sudden spike thousands of new admin accounts presumably either.

Potential for Twitter share price jump today maybe...
 
It's being traded right now, the financial markets don't shut down when the new york stock exchange does. The price is down, big. Who would have guessed. It may bounce back during the day because they can't keep going down forever.
 
Speaking of parler:


Here is a description of what went down according to someone with far greater technical knowledge than me:
"so a group of developers latched onto the Press Release that Twilio put out at midnight last night. In that Press Release, Twilio accidentally revealed which services Parler was using. Turns out it was all of the security authentications that were used to register a user. This allowed anyone to create a user, and not have to verify an email address, and immediately have a logged-on account.
Well, because of that access, it gave them access to the behind the login box API that is used to deliver content -- ALL CONTENT (parleys, video, images, user profiles, user information, etc) --. But what it also did was revealed which USERS had "Administration" rights, "Moderation" rights.
Well, then what happened, those user accounts that had Administration rights to the entire platform... The hackers, internet warriors, call it what you will, was able to use the forgot password link to change the password. Why? Because Twilio was no longer authenticating emails. This meant, they'd get directly to the reset password screen of that Administration user.
This group of Internet Warriors then used that account, to create a handful of other ADMINISTRATION accounts, and then created a script that ended up creating MILLIONS of fake administration accounts.
Now that they had a way of creating admin accounts without interruption, they created a Docker Image (basically a virtual machine) called a Warrior, that anyone could download, and when fired up, would immediately start collecting data off of Parlre, in a coordinated fashion.
Consider it like SETI (Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) that people used to load up as screen savers when their computers were not being used. Same concept, crowdsourcing.
All of this data, the videos, the images, the posts, the metadata (including the GEO location of all images and videos, and the connections to the accounts that posted it, has been (since midnight) being uploaded to various cloud drives and storage arrays for the purposes of Archiving this information, for later retrieval by law enforcement, by the public, by Open Source Intelligence communities.
And the kicker.. is this: all of this information was thought to be secure and private by individuals who were making the posts. A significant number of those individuals went through the process of being a "Verified Citizen" on Parler. What does that mean?
It means they uploaded a picture of the front and back of their REAL State Driver's License........ Let that sink in for a second.
I am positive the FBI has been actively soaking in this information along with the Internet Warriors, but this is how they are going to officially track down.
And it's how the FBI, DHS, and FAA have been able to immediately and exhaustively create no-fly lists. Every verified attendee of the Capitol riot where they can find a real name has been placed on No-Fly Lists.
It might seem like a small geeky glitch or hack.. but in the age of Information warfare... this is the silver bullet for the people who used Parler as a place to organize their efforts.
Also, a lot of posts were deleted by Parler members after the riots on the 6th. Turned out... Parler didn't actually delete anything.. just set a bit as deleted.
Guess what has access to all "deleted" content?
Administrator accounts."
 
There's so much wrong with all this on so many levels.
from Parler being absolute crap to ppl being doxed, send that info to the feds to sort out.
 
You're on the wrong level there, there has to be a crime committed for the feds to sort anything out. This is about identifying the infidels, and getting them fired, refusing to provide them with services, and so forth. When this happens in a communist country, the state police are on top of the situation with beatings and executions to make sure the unarmed population comply. America is missing that important component or communism, they think they can oppress armed people and then dissuade any violent reaction with twitter bans and fact checks.
 
Shocker, I'm wrong.. again! and @dantes is right.. AGAIN!
When will I learn!
(I actually meant more about the people who deleted their messages around being on capitol hill after they knew the police were after them, after they committed a crime and took pictures)

And yes agree doxing just cos people are using the platform is. Lol at calling the machine 'warrior'
 
Back
Top Bottom