Last Wednesday the town of Bolton fell silent for the funeral of Nat Lofthouse who, for seventy years of his life, was a devoted servant to the Wanderers in various roles. Bolton loved him as he did them.
And he was a huge reminder of a much-missed past when there was a host of one-club players. Displaying unquestioned loyalty, they never gave a thought to the ‘advantages’ of defecting.
Even when they did ‘think’ — Preston’s Tom Finney was once attracted by riches promised by an Italian club — they were easily dissuaded.
Sadly, times have changed and this season we’ve had some of the worst examples of players betraying the clubs they profess to love or, at least, threatening to — first Rooney, then Tevez and now Torres. Fans must be sick of hearing things said that are supposedly true only to find out that they’re not.
On January 9 2011 Torres said: “My head is only with Liverpool, I have not considered leaving: I am professional and always fulfil my deals. Now, more than ever, we need to stick together.â€
How can you argue if fans today think he’s a traitor?
Me? My cynicism towards footballers grows by the day. Every time I see a ‘badge being kissed’ makes me want to throw up because, usually and overwhelmingly, I know it’s a lie.
Has the Spaniard a defence? Well, clearly, his disenchantment at Anfield goes back a while to the Hicks/Gillett era of false promises. To be fair, most were taken in by that pair.
And who could have been ‘inspired’ by the shocking six-month reign of Roy Hodgson?
But Torres’ timing was appalling and an insult to the club that employed him and, more importantly, the fans that embraced him. Had he made his transfer request at the beginning of January, Liverpool could have avoided the last minute scramble in the market: that was Torres’ fault.
So, too, was the evident lack of effort he showed in recent months. Okay, you might not think much of your manager (Hodgson) but you surely owe it to the supporters. They will remember?
Kenny Dalglish, rightly, is interested only in players that want to be at Liverpool. He wouldn’t want a major figure sulking around the place till the end of the season. And, even though they’ve signed a great player, that’s a problem Chelsea will now have with Drogba and Anelka.
Liverpool? I believe they’ve come out of it pretty well. Though it’s a huge price to pay for a player that isn’t yet the finished article, the counter-argument is that Dalglish has signed someone who’ll be playing for England for the next 10 years. Andy Carroll is a great prospect.
And, when you count up all the fees involved (you can’t always trust what you’re told) — Carroll £35m, Suarez £22m, Torres £50m and Babel £6m — Liverpool come out pretty even.
They’ve allowed two unhappy or under-performing players to leave and bought two, both young with potential, that fit into the NESV game plan: the owners made a huge statement of intent in how they reacted to the mess created by Torres. That’s pretty good business to me.
I’ll be at Stamford Bridge on Sunday: the Spaniard in a blue shirt faced by a returning Jamie Carragher? Should be interesting?