[quote author=Stu link=topic=38460.msg1034635#msg1034635 date=1263556200]
Ok, it is rather dismissive of me, I know.
But Hiddink is the wrong manager for Liverpool on so many different levels.
His age is a big, big problem for me. He is too old. At 63 years of age he will not be a good long-term appointment. He doesn't look like he looks after himself and it could be possible his ticker isn't exactly A1. Look at Trappatoni, he is a very fit 70+ year old man. One thing I really admire and respect Rafa for his grabbing hold of the youth academy system at Liverpool and completely rejuvinating it. He had to sack some pretty well respected people to do it, but he put the club first before all others. Hiddink isn't the one to bring that on and improve on it.
With regard to his time at Chelsea, I wouldn't put too much stock in the fact he managed to win the FA cup with that team of Superstars. They had to beat these boys : Southend United by aid of a replay, Ipswich Town, Watford, Coventry City and a young Arsenal side. Chumps basically.
Hiddink's pedigree has been made at International level Squiggs, that's my view.
He's not the man for the job. Maybe on a short term basis, but not for the long haul.
[/quote]
Yeah, I agree with that. I'd take him on an 18 month deal and see what happens. I'm not saying he's a brilliant manager - I don't think he is. However I do credit him more than yourself for his Chelsea achievement; A team full of superstars they may be - but they were in complete disarray, hugely missed Mourinho and were greatly under performing. He turned that all around, and got everyone on board quickly. And had his record at Chelsea been extended throughout the season, they would have won the league at a canter. Not much more you can ask really.
As the circumstances we face aren't so different, I think it's an attractive option. At least until we line up a long-term successor.