• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

What Happened At Half-Time In Istanbul

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've raised that substitution before now, but not because there was no reason for it (though a shit and ineffective striker should still arguably have stayed on the pitch when we were chasing the game and had nobody to replace like with like). I've raised it because of the players' reaction at the time and the light it shed, at least partially, on how they were feeling about things, which were pretty clear and not just a matter of media exaggeration. You're right about the media setting the agenda when too often there's bugger all to base it on, but I don't happen to think this was an example of that.

Nothing to argue with here.
 
Nah Judge, he's not ... We were out THEN b/c of him ... and we're out NOW b/c of those who screwed up after him ... (Quoting LTW here)
 
You're missing the point. There are plenty on here, quite apart from the haters, and increasingly including yourself, who only ever have negative things to say about the man. They claim that they just have a fair and balanced viewpoint without ever offering it.

I'm sorry, but I stand by my opinion that the people on this site represent the extreme negative of LFC fans' views on the bloke.

I don't think there is anyone who never says anything positive about Benitez. Even people who are pleased he has gone always seem to acknowledge the good things he did for the club.
 
Shelvey: in that case I'd have expected to see "Which we were out of because of him", but Wizzy's one of my oldest mates on here, so I'll leave it at that.

Your boy did well tonight BTW.
 
He left our club with us out of the UCL. That is a fact - and doesn't take away from anything he did (which is what you're implying) ....

There's no point into continuing however as you're in the last group I mentioned ("another minority who see him as some perfect manager who made no mistakes, and was only screwed by the owners."), and that means we'd both be wasting our time.

Nah, I don't think that, I just think people tend to focus too much on his failings on here. He did plenty wrong, as well. Take care
 
fuck me.

He got us closer to the prem than anyone will for a while and won the champions league and people moan about a fucking substitution.

God knows what would happen on here if Rafa had spent that £80m last summer..
 
Well, you're wrong.

Most people here can balance the good and the bad. How does that make this site representive of the "etreme negative"?

Haha, the irony. You'd be the exact archetype of the sort I was thinking of who claims a balanced opinion but is somehow only ever negative.

And if you don't think we're the extreme negative go and check out what other much bigger forums say about him.
 
You can't throw rawk in though Pete, it's like north Korea over there
 
I've raised that substitution before now, but not because there was no reason for it (though a shit and ineffective striker should still arguably have stayed on the pitch when we were chasing the game and had nobody to replace like with like). I've raised it because of the players' reaction at the time and the light it shed, at least partially, on how they were feeling about things, which were pretty clear and not just a matter of media exaggeration. You're right about the media setting the agenda when too often there's bugger all to base it on, but I don't happen to think this was an example of that.

It wasn't the players plural reaction it was a player's singular reaction. And he only pulled a face. Half the time he looks like a bulldog licking piss off a nettle anyways. Maybe he'd just remembered he hadn't punched any kids that morning. The media took a three second image of Gerrard looking pissed off and made it indicative of dressing room revolts. What do we all think of Gerrard's chances of being a great football manager? What right has he to question Rafa's subs? It was momentary insubordination from a spoilt wankbag, but that's not what the Shearers of this world want to talk about.
 
We ain't like RAWK et al because people have their own minds and opinions, rather than just following others like Lemmings.
Back to the issue in hand..... Best manager we have had in many many years. Got us very close, and I will always be thankful for that. Christ if I went with you and Spion, I would have sung Rafa songs and cheered and clapped like a fool.
However, he had lost the plot in his final 18 months, probably the dressing room too, and he had to go. And I was delighted to see it happen. The last 6 months of his tenure was as bad as it has been under anyone before or since in my living memory.
Smoke that Peter!!!
 
It wasn't the players plural reaction it was a player's singular reaction. And he only pulled a face. Half the time he looks like a bulldog licking piss off a nettle anyways. Maybe he'd just remembered he hadn't punched any kids that morning. The media took a three second image of Gerrard looking pissed off and made it indicative of dressing room revolts. What do we all think of Gerrard's chances of being a great football manager? What right has he to question Rafa's subs? It was momentary insubordination from a spoilt wankbag, but that's not what the Shearers of this world want to talk about.

Haha that's absolute quality.
 
Sorry but it isn't, it's a load of hooey. For one thing, Torres was just as visibly naffed off. For another, it doesn't matter a light what "right" they had to feel that way. The point here is that they had become sufficiently disillusioned with Rafa to let it show publicly.
 
Shelvey: in that case I'd have expected to see "Which we were out of because of him", but Wizzy's one of my oldest mates on here, so I'll leave it at that.

Your boy did well tonight BTW.

You're being pedantic ole chap ... Rafa left us with a good squad but out of the CL. Was the squad good enough to get back into the CL? I believe it was, and perhaps he could have got us back in. Roy was obviously not capable and the blame has to fall on him for that shit 6 months. As for Kenny's 18 months ... Sadly, he didn't do a good job at all after the first 6 months.
 
For one thing, Torres was just as visibly naffed off.

Well he wasn't, but even if he was.... are you saying that every time a player looks a bit glum at being subbed we've got a management situation on our hands? Or should we just strike that argument from the record?

The point here is that they had become sufficiently disillusioned with Rafa to let it show publicly.

Always with the they when it was just a he.
 
fuck me.

He got us closer to the prem than anyone will for a while and won the champions league and people moan about a fucking substitution.

God knows what would happen on here if Rafa had spent that £80m last summer..

Post of the year
 
Well he wasn't, but even if he was.... are you saying that every time a player looks a bit glum at being subbed we've got a management situation on our hands? Or should we just strike that argument from the record?



Always with the they when it was just a he.

Have another look at the video. Torres quite visibly shrugs when Stevie looks at him.

You can caricature what I'm saying all you like, but you won't escape the point, which - once again - is that Rafa had provoked TWO senior players into an unmistakable (for those willing to see what's in front of them) show of public dissent. I'm not saying they were right to do what they did. I *am* saying that, right or wrong, their behaviour makes it clear that there were problems between Rafa and at least some of his senior players, and that such things are never going to be just one side's fault wherever they occur.
 
Have another look at the video. Torres quite visibly shrugs when Stevie looks at him.

You can caricature what I'm saying all you like, but you won't escape the point, which - once again - is that Rafa had provoked TWO senior players into an unmistakable (for those willing to see what's in front of them) show of public dissent. I'm not saying they were right to do what they did. I *am* saying that, right or wrong, their behaviour makes it clear that there were problems between Rafa and at least some of his senior players, and that such things are never going to be just one side's fault wherever they occur.

Didn't RAWK claim it was Carra that helped push him out?
 
Have another look at the video. Torres quite visibly shrugs when Stevie looks at him.

You can caricature what I'm saying all you like, but you won't escape the point, which - once again - is that Rafa had provoked TWO senior players into an unmistakable (for those willing to see what's in front of them) show of public dissent. I'm not saying they were right to do what they did. I *am* saying that, right or wrong, their behaviour makes it clear that there were problems between Rafa and at least some of his senior players, and that such things are never going to be just one side's fault wherever they occur.

You're really weakening what argument you have by including Torres in it.
 
The pair of you are sailing right past the point. Whatever they thought, whatever they did about it rightly or wrongly, part of a manager's job is to keep the dressing-room onside and there is clearly visible evidence that Rafa wasn't doing that.
You're really weakening what argument you have by including Torres in it.

You wish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom