[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=33965.msg882005#msg882005 date=1244109140]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=33965.msg881993#msg881993 date=1244108206]
Some good points there and I'd be happy enough with Bent if we did get him as Torres' stand-in. However, I don't see Tuncay as being mere "padding" any more than Bent would be. He's not as quick but he's trickier and more versatile, so he could play Torres' role when we needed that as well as covering those other positions, and a few mill.off the fee will be more than useful elsewhere.
Someone mentioned Nemeth, who I rated when I saw him before. Is he fit and ready after his injury? If so, then yes, he could be the answer.
[/quote]
Tuncay leading the line? The Turkish midget would get battered. It'd just never happen.
He'd be most successful in the Gerrard role - but he's never going to replace him, let face it - and then reasonably effective on the flanks. You have to see Tuncay as a Yossi MkII. Ergo, not 'striking back-up'.
Bent's credentials for that role are especially fitting; he's shown at Chalton he can score a huge amount of goals as a lone striker while playing on his own, as well as showing similar ability in a 4-4-2 at Spurs - which is exactly what we need.
[/quote]
Torres doesn't lead the line either. We don't play with a line for our point man to lead. Our formation calls for someone to run around, keep the defence off balance and take a chance when it comes. Tuncay can certainly do that, and has done for Middlesboro when others around him have gone AWOL.
But yes, as I said I'd take Bent instead, PROVIDED the higher fee he'd cost us didn't scupper our efforts to strengthen elsewhere in the team.