That bit really. Sturridge was appaz on 70,000 last season.wage structure issues aside
That bit really. Sturridge was appaz on 70,000 last season.
Funny, doesn't seem much now, but giving him that contract when we signed him actually wasn't much different from Remy now, if you think about it. Presumably he only got it because of the daft amount Chelsea had thrown at him.
Have you got some really interesting odds to prove it?
i really like sturridge but i'm still not sold on him as the focal point of an attack.
And Liverpool are reportedly in advanced talks with Chelsea over a £26m deal for Romelu Lukaku. Everton will not be pleased.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jul/14/the-rumour-mill-lukaku-reus-liverpool
Hmm, not really sure what more he has to do to convince people. His record for us is phenomenal. Is it a doubt about his quality or him playing as a lone striker? Or is it the dance?
That would be some fantastic business.
No way - please let this not be true. Can do without this guy.
And Liverpool are reportedly in advanced talks with Chelsea over a £26m deal for Romelu Lukaku. Everton will not be pleased.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/jul/14/the-rumour-mill-lukaku-reus-liverpool
Sold let's get him! Why would Chelsea do this!
Not keen on Lukaku.
erm.. don't know how to say this but does he remind you of Heskey ?
Not keen on Lukaku.
I don't think there's any chance of us signing him. Just no way could I see Chelsea selling to us.
How in gods name can they justify £29million on Shaw and £25-£30 on Herrera, but decide £34million is too much for Vidal.Mike Keegan @mikekeeganbbc · 1h
#mufc adamant they won't pay £34m for Vidal. There's interest but won't pay what they think is over the odds.
Yeah but look at where Griezmanns goes next
Yes, meanwhile Lucas' goes 5 yards sideways to a Liverpool player.