Transfer Deadline Day - Sept 1st, 2023
- Thread starter LeTallecWiz
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Wow, Bayern’s Palhinha deal collapsed. In fact all of their deadline day deals didn’t work out. Absolute bummer for Tuchel. Making us look almost competent in comparison.
German window closing earlier than others is a significant competitive disadvantage, no? I wonder if they will push to change it after this debacle.
German window closing earlier than others is a significant competitive disadvantage, no? I wonder if they will push to change it after this debacle.
Hahahahaha post of the day there
LBJ is looking like he is been eating too much fried chicken
I thought you could still sign free agents outside the window?
He’s not a free agent
So Utd are going to keep him contracted to the club until 2025 despite releasing a statement effectively saying his career there is over?
Fuck knows, but the Lazio deal was a loan
Wage liability. Man Utd don’t want to pay him so getting some else to is their aim
Re Greenwood:
Still registered and under contract. Understood that he won't play for United again - they keep paying him, he doesn't agitate for constructive dismissal.
They release him - they'd have to pay up (or negotiate a settlement of) his contract and they wouldn't get any future transfer fee if someone signed him permanently.
Loan him out - get a fee and/or contribution to wages - mitigates their wage liability.
Manage to sell him - save future wages and maybe get a fee.
So the reality is that the moral stance (he won't play for the club again) is tainted by the financial position, although in truth I can hardly blame them - they've sidelined the cunt, it would sting if they had to pay him a shitload of cash on top (which they still might have to if no-one offers him a squad place somewhere else).
Still registered and under contract. Understood that he won't play for United again - they keep paying him, he doesn't agitate for constructive dismissal.
They release him - they'd have to pay up (or negotiate a settlement of) his contract and they wouldn't get any future transfer fee if someone signed him permanently.
Loan him out - get a fee and/or contribution to wages - mitigates their wage liability.
Manage to sell him - save future wages and maybe get a fee.
So the reality is that the moral stance (he won't play for the club again) is tainted by the financial position, although in truth I can hardly blame them - they've sidelined the cunt, it would sting if they had to pay him a shitload of cash on top (which they still might have to if no-one offers him a squad place somewhere else).
He laughed.
By all accounts he is as he appears - or certainly was in those days - friendly, fun sort of guy and quite down to earth - liked a beer and liked the ladies.
I think managing Rangers while they were being liquidated broke him a bit.
Why Divock? He joins Forest on a season long loan!
A defensive midfielder apparently
Well he'll probably not be in the best frame of mind now. Mught be perfect for a cheeky bid of £55m in January, when Fulham have had tine to find a replacement? 😉
So he can score the goal to send Everton down
My first act when hearing Forest signed him was to look for when this fixture was.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked