If chelsea are buying non-stop, let's get some of their "scrubs" for good fees .
. Offer 40 million for Gallagher...
I'd take Noel Gallagher if he could play centre mid
If chelsea are buying non-stop, let's get some of their "scrubs" for good fees .
. Offer 40 million for Gallagher...
How good is Mudryk? @rurikbird any insight?
How good is Mudryk? @rurikbird any insight?
Just so we could punch that cunt's head in at every training session.I'd take Noel Gallagher if he could play centre mid
8,5 year contract is a bit mad
That’s what I was thinking, too. Quite a few new signings have ridiculously long contracts.Exploiting FFP loop holes: "fees are amortised over the length of a player's contract."
Badiashile's contract is 7.5 yrs.
That’s what I was thinking, too. Quite a few new signings have ridiculously long contracts.
Dog shagging cunts.Ten Hag can get fucked. Same with playmo head.
Now this would be a top top top signing for them.
Properly solidify that spine for years ...
If only we had the ability to do this when we were on top and winning the last 2 years .
1. There will be major issues with the fans if we are part of sports washing.Why would our owners do that - I think I know whats going on now, they are properly running down the club into a selling mode:
1) it will impact us on the pitch as they predict, Liverpool fans get so tired of it, they won't kick up a fuss if an Arab owner comes in. Fans will be desperate for anyone with Billions to come in to invest and rejuvenate the team.
2) reduce the wage bill to make the books look better as they rip all that data analysis and scouting out of the club.
3) by keeping the employee count low - it allows the new owners to implement their own structures without making huge cuts in jobs.
Simple really.
1. There will be major issues with the fans if we are part of sports washing.
2. That whole department would make less money than one oxlade chamberlain or Keita
3. New owners wouldn’t think twice about moving someone on who didn’t feature in their plans