[quote author=dmishra link=topic=41551.msg1160555#msg1160555 date=1282626053]
[quote author=Tal link=topic=41551.msg1160376#msg1160376 date=1282598950]
There is no arguing that City were powerful, motivated, with very talented players all over the pitch and really up for this first home game of their season; probably benefitting from the power of the debutant as well as the presence of the Sheikh. They made us look predictable in the final third too, suggesting Mancini prepared them very well against our known methods of attack.
However, their first goal seemed to me like ball watching (by Kuyt?) when he should have been tracking Barry - Andy Gray highlighted that at half time I think.
The second goal I didn't quite see, did it come off a red head or did a city player get to it? Regardless, I do wonder if our old zonal marking might have made it more difficult to get such a header in. Perhaps we are suffering from a change in defensive systems and it'll just take some time. We did have our best set of defenders on the pitch after all.
And the third goal looked like a dive by Adam Johnson to win the penalty. I haven't seen any close-up replays though. Was it?
So, whilst it was shit, for me it felt like a case of individual mistakes that can be put right on the training ground rather than a complete failure as a team.
Offensively they had us under control almost entirely. That was more of a worry.
[/quote]
No it wasn't. It was a clear cut penalty.
[/quote]
It was but Skrtel had it all to do. Agger and whoever else it was had the piss ripped out of them by Johnson (again) and the ball was loose with Skrtel and Johnson both challenging for it, Johnson was just quicker that's all. Skrtel had an otherwise solid game and was commanding in the air again. People keep saying Agger is 'strong' in the air, probably the strongest out of the back four. What a load of bollocks, cf the second goal.
[quote author=Tal link=topic=41551.msg1160376#msg1160376 date=1282598950]
There is no arguing that City were powerful, motivated, with very talented players all over the pitch and really up for this first home game of their season; probably benefitting from the power of the debutant as well as the presence of the Sheikh. They made us look predictable in the final third too, suggesting Mancini prepared them very well against our known methods of attack.
However, their first goal seemed to me like ball watching (by Kuyt?) when he should have been tracking Barry - Andy Gray highlighted that at half time I think.
The second goal I didn't quite see, did it come off a red head or did a city player get to it? Regardless, I do wonder if our old zonal marking might have made it more difficult to get such a header in. Perhaps we are suffering from a change in defensive systems and it'll just take some time. We did have our best set of defenders on the pitch after all.
And the third goal looked like a dive by Adam Johnson to win the penalty. I haven't seen any close-up replays though. Was it?
So, whilst it was shit, for me it felt like a case of individual mistakes that can be put right on the training ground rather than a complete failure as a team.
Offensively they had us under control almost entirely. That was more of a worry.
[/quote]
No it wasn't. It was a clear cut penalty.
[/quote]
It was but Skrtel had it all to do. Agger and whoever else it was had the piss ripped out of them by Johnson (again) and the ball was loose with Skrtel and Johnson both challenging for it, Johnson was just quicker that's all. Skrtel had an otherwise solid game and was commanding in the air again. People keep saying Agger is 'strong' in the air, probably the strongest out of the back four. What a load of bollocks, cf the second goal.