• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

The Lions 2013

Lions 2013: James Horwill verdict means rugby union can never again claim the moral high ground

James Horwill in, Paul O’Connell out – the scales of justice came crashing down from a great height in Australia.

horwill_2598688b.jpg

Cleared: Wallaby captain James Horwill was found not guilty of stamping on the head of Alun-Wyn Jones in the first Test Photo: GETTY IMAGES


By Mick Cleary, Rugby Union Correspondent, in Brisbane
3:34PM BST 24 Jun 2013


While the Lions lock fiddles with the splint on his fractured arm and curses his luck, the captain of Australia, with a nod to the judicial officer who cleared him of an alleged stamp on Alun-Wyn Jones, primes himself for the battle to save the series on Saturday.
They used to know the value of deterrent and hard labour in these parts, the need for appropriate sanction to set an example to others. In one fell swoop the disciplinary buffoons have made a mockery of their own system.

There is only one message that can be derived from Saturday’s action, which involved clear contact of the Horwill boot on Jones’s head, and it is that kicks to that part of the body are not always a foul and heinous thing. No one is suggesting Horwill should be sentenced to a spot of rock breaking for his recklessness.
He is not a thug or a villain by reputation – sparky and fiery, for sure – but this was beyond the pale and he ought to be missing this all-important Test. Even the Australians seemed taken aback by the leniency; a local leaned across the breakfast table in Brisbane on Monday and apologised. A few tables away were the well-stacked hulks from the New South Wales rugby league team. They, too, know all about the need for restraint.

Quite whether they adhere to it for Wednesday night’s second game of this year’s State of Origin remains to be seen, but they fully realise what will happen if they step out of line. These hard men of the footie code have been put on the naughty step following a punch-up in game one.

“Ban the Biff” was the front-page headline that greeted news that the rugby league authorities were cracking down after the bad publicity caused by the dust-up. Rugby league used to pride itself on its macho roughness. Now it is acutely sensitive to the need to capture hearts and minds of the young, or of their mothers at any rate.
Rugby union, meanwhile, does not seem to care a fig. Horwill’s reprieve creates a terrible precedent.
The case was dismissed because the judicial officer, Nick Hampton of New Zealand, was not persuaded that Horwill had intended to kick Jones. The hearing took well over three hours. Well, here is a simple truth heard many times from players down the generations – they always know where their feet are. Always.
They know where bodies are beneath them. And they certainly have an acute awareness of where someone’s head is. There might be some repercussions yet, with the International Rugby Board keeping a beady eye on developments.
Saturday’s first Test was an enormously high-profile occasion. It was hyped to the hilt, and it delivered on that front, thousands descending on Brisbane, many, many more tuning in to the TV footage from all corners. The authorities cannot have it both ways.
If they want to promote the sport, to present it as vibrant, worthy and appealing, then they have to set standards that matter. On Sunday night, the disciplinary infrastructure collapsed.
Rugby often bangs on about occupying the moral high ground, particularly in regard to that feckless lot in football. Never again can it peddle that line. Never again can it pretend that it has high ethical codes of behaviour. And never again can it claim that its system of justice is equitable round the globe.
Once again there appears to be one law applied in the southern hemisphere, quite another in operation elsewhere. There have been too many miscarriages for it to be coincidence. Schalk Burger and his alleged gouging of Luke Fitzgerald in South Africa four years ago. The high, swinging arm of Wallaby centre, Nathan Grey that took out Richard Hill 12 years ago.
Marius Bosman on Doddie Weir in 1997, Tana Umaga and his mates on Brian O’Driscoll 2005. Innocent of all charges, m’lud. It stinks.
Blinkers on Down Under
The worldly view from Australia. Suncorp Stadium was packed to the rafters on Saturday with 20,000 fans from overseas. The bars and restaurants throughout Brisbane had been heaving all day long. The noise was deafening as the teams emerged. And remained so. “So, Israel Folau, does that compare to State of Origin?” the triple-code Wallaby was asked afterwards without a hint of irony.
Yes, that is the State of Origin rugby league series played between the same two states every year. Sometimes you can only shake your head.
Davies a true sportsman
The human touch. The adrenalin was flowing just before kick-off on Saturday. Both teams were pumped and ready for action. Within 52 seconds debutant Wallaby centre Christian Leali’ifano was out cold on the turf after his head struck Jonathan Davies’s hip. The action moved on, yet Davies saw immediately that his opposite number was in trouble, all spaced out with his pupils staring upwards. Davies stayed with him and made sure the referee called a halt to play. Good man.
 
Parling pulled from midweek game with Evans coming into the starting line-up. Thata would strongly suggest that it's Parling and A W Jones in the second row for the 2nd test.
 
Frankie Sheahan:

Overall, the Welsh influence on the game was massive. As well as Davies and Halfpenny, George North was outstanding, Alun-Wyn Jones was rock-solid in the second-row, Adam Jones was terrific in the front-row – he was withdrawn too early – while Alex Cuthbert had his best game of the tour so far.
But while Gatland is loyal to the Welsh lads that have served him well as their national coach, he is now faced with a massive decision regarding Sam Warburton.
The flanker did okay on Saturday, but I expected a bigger showing from him, especially as Lions captain. Their expected dominance in that area didn't materialise and someone like Sean O'Brien would give a huge lift to the side.
O'Brien would also bring some much needed bulk to that Lions pack. All the talk pre-Test was how much bigger and stronger the Lions were than the Australians, but when the pack weights were added up for Saturday, the Lions weighted in four-and-a-half stone lighter than their hosts.
It is a myth that they are more powerful than Australia and that showed on Saturday. O'Brien and potentially the selection of Richard Hibbard could change that.
The Lions will improve a lot from Saturday and I expect them to run out easy winners now.
Yet, only for Halfpenny and the Australians' lack of a reliable kicker, it could be a whole different story.

George Hook:

Much will be made of the interpretation of the breakdown by referee Chris Pollock, but he was entirely consistent throughout the 80 minutes – the Lions would have had adequate warning of his style and should have adjusted.
In true New Zealand fashion, his entire focus was to provide a quick, open game, which is part and parcel of Super Rugby. Just because O'Driscoll and others are allowed to compete on the ground in the Six Nations does not make it right.
The most influential player on the field by a mile was Wallaby scrum-half Will Genia who was simply magnificent in every phase of the game and made Mike Phillips look like a club player.
Genia consistently prompted the players around him to run superb angles off his passes which constantly got them over the gainline, but the Lions' scramble defence held out.
Gatland also faces a tough call in the back-row where Sam Warburton and Tom Croft were completely outplayed by their opposite numbers and, at times, Jamie Heaslip seemed to be the only functioning part of the unit. The kicking from the hand by both teams was by and large deplorable and two of the four tries came from loose kicks.
Mike Phillips was the primary culprit as almost every box kick was far too long. Only Jonny Sexton for the Lions displayed any control and his Garryowens and dinks were invariably on the money.
 
Frankie Sheahan is suggesting that O'Brien and Hibbard should come into the side because it would make us bigger and more powerful...............................He clearly doesn't appreciate the finer points of the game.
 
Phillips was pretty shite on Saturday. If he wasn't one of Gatlands main men (same with BOD now that Tuilagi is fit), then his position in the test team would be in serious doubt.
 
I wouldn't pick this side, but i suspect we'll see the same team except for Parling and Vunipola included (for the injured Corbisiero and O'Connell). If we go with a 5-3 bench split again then that means that 2 of Lydiate , Faletua and O'Brien will miss out + 1 of Tuilagi and Bowe will not be included.
 
Lions 2013: forwards give Warren Gatland something to think about - but will it make any difference?

This was thoroughly enjoyable stuff. The British and Irish Lions won easily, despite the always honest and unrelenting efforts of the Melbourne captain Gareth Delve, and they played with a refreshing ambition and intensity.

Evans_2599442b.jpg

On the bench? Ian Evans had his best game of the Lions' Australia tour Photo: GETTY IMAGES


By Steve James
12:50PM BST 25 Jun 2013


As a result there were some eye-catching individual performances. For a start Owen Farrell will have silenced a few carpers. He can do more than just kick. He stood flat and threatened the line, putting supporting runners into holes, and often looking to tap and go. And, as ever, he kicked superbly.
Many eyes were on Manu Tuilagi. How was he after injury? He was fine, especially in the first half, where his power was prominent and effective.

Up front, though, was where the real stars lay. The scrummage was excellent, and, after a couple of horrible early wobbles, the line out was satisfactory enough too. Ryan Grant, Richard Hibbard, Ian Evans, Richie Gray, Dan Lydiate, Toby Faletau and Sean O’Brien all had matches that showed their class.
The question, of course, is how much notice will be taken of these efforts. Will they mean anything come Thursday and the announcement of Saturday’s Test team?

Could Grant’s scrummaging earn him a start, because Mako Vunipola hardly did anything to dispel fears about that part of his game last Saturday? Or was the quality of opposition here not sufficient to tell? I think Vunipola will start instead of the injured Alex Corbisiero.

Hibbard was especially powerful in the second half but he has no chance of displacing Tom Youngs, who had the game of his life in Brisbane.

Both Evans and Gray had their best games of the tour - Evans everywhere in contact and stealing one important line-out on the Lions line and Gray showing his remarkable dexterity and athleticism - but Alun Wyn Jones and Geoff Parling will be the starters on Saturday. That much has been said already.

Evans or Gray on the bench? I’d go for Evans, although Tom Croft could easily slip into the second row, allowing another back-rower on the bench.

But the introduction of Parling instead of the hugely unfortunate Paul O’Connell does raise questions about the make up of the starting back row. Parling is lightweight. He does not possess O’Connell’s physicality, and it was always a worry going into the first Test that the back row was a little loose and lacked a tough tackler.

Could Croft’s place be under threat? His work in Ben Youngs' try here underlined his value, but Lydiate, all graft and exemplary tackling technique, could have done little more as captain in this victory. There was also a lovely off-load for O’Brien’s try at the front of a line-out. I think Croft will still play.

That O’Brien was replaced before Lydiate may have suggested that he might get the nod on the replacements bench this weekend. Or we could just be reading too much into this. Lydiate soon joined him.

But it was a surprise that Lydiate, an out-and-out blindside, was a replacement last weekend, when O’Brien, bustling with energy and involvement here, can cover all three back-row positions.

Faletau was his usual self, always making yards and simply not making any mistakes. He was the Lions’ leading carrier here. Jamie Heaslip will be concerned, but I still think he will start.
It was a good victory, especially as no points were conceded, but the truth is that its significance to Saturday may not be huge.
 
I like this:

Especially striking was the contrast between the relatively obscure 1971 tour, which was covered by a handful of newspapers and no television, and today’s era, in which a tiny camera embedded in the corner flag can capture the writhing features of a sliding George North at 50 frames per second.
“We knew we’d beaten New Zealand,” said Gareth Edwards, “but we didn’t know what it meant.” Over time, Lions tours have developed multiple meanings; fermenting into their current heady brew of blind patriotism, confused symbolism, bacon sandwiches, aggressive marketing and weird HSBC adverts starring Warren Gatland as a fat sailor. There is even some rugby to enjoy; at least, before the inevitable, onrushing mushroom cloud of hype that is ‘Lions 2017’.
Still, there is a crystalline beauty to it too; this sporting anachronism that somehow manages to remain fiercely relevant through shrewd scheduling and shared purpose. If the Lions were run by cricket administrators, the current tour of Australia would swiftly be followed by a return series in Britain, followed by further tours in 2014, 2015 and twice in 2016. If football administrators were left in charge, the Lions would have collapsed under the weight of internal politics long before it expanded from four nations to 32.
There are signs, however, that the balance between sport and event is being tilted ever so slightly from former to latter, and nowhere was this more apparent than on Sky Sports. “There are special days in sport, and there are famous days in life,” said presenter Alex Payne, raising an interesting metaphysical question: if a sentence means absolutely nothing, does it still exist? Scott Quinnell, meanwhile, was more concerned about Israel Folau: “How do we negify what he brings?”
Afterwards, Quinnell dissected the victory: “The important thing is we won a Test match. I don’t care by how many points, or how they did it.” This was an unconventional approach to post-match analysis, or indeed any analysis. In Quinnell’s world, it seems, the end not merely justifies the means, but negifies it. One wonders how Quinnell might handle other vocations.

Quinnell the art critic: “The skill is irrelevant. The important thing is that the painting’s there, nailed on to the wall.” Quinnell the driving instructor: “You got us back to the test centre. That’s what matters. People don’t remember the broken headlights, the screaming pedestrians, the televised police helicopter chase. You’ve passed. Now go and make history.”
This is not to malign Quinnell, who has clearly been hired to play the slightly tipsy older brother of the party, the one who goes around talking loudly and trying to hug everyone. But if we were going to go with emotion over explanation, then surely the defining motif of the match was the plight of Kurtley Beale, wearing the trauma of a man who has just remembered, as his car slides into a river, that he left his golf clubs in the boot.
Beale’s story was by far the most compelling. And yet it was largely ignored in Sky’s adrenalin-fuelled rush to interview every single Lions player on the pitch. They managed six in all, plus the coach, and followed it up with a resolutely single-minded discussion. “What about the Lions breakdown? The Lions pack? The Lions replacements? What about Lion bars? The Lion King? What about the Katanga Lion of south-west Africa, which eats up to 75 pounds of meat in one meal? What does that say about Lions in general? Let’s see that North try again.”
Maybe Sky’s tendentiousness said more about the Lions concept itself: a quadrennial Anglo-Celtic love-in over fried breakfast and morning ales.
Maybe British viewers were less concerned about balance than wallowing in the lustrous glow of victory. But fervour and contour are not polar opposites. It is possible to convey the essence and importance of the Lions without referring to them as “we”.
Otherwise, we may as well all be Scott Quinnell. Life would certainly be a lot more fun, although given its ending it is arguable whether it could ever be judged a success.
 
Ben Youngs replaces Mike Phillips at scrum-half and fit-again wing Tommy Bowe comes into the side as the British & Irish Lions make five changes for Saturday's second Test in Melbourne.
Flanker Dan Lydiate also comes into the starting XV, with Alex Cuthbert and Tom Croft the other men to miss out.
Lock Geoff Parling and prop Mako Vunipola are promoted in place of the injured Paul O'Connell and Alex Corbisiero.

Lions team: Leigh Halfpenny, Tommy Bowe, Brian O'Driscoll, Jonathan Davies, George North, Jonathan Sexton, Ben Youngs, Mako Vunipola, Tom Youngs, Adam Jones, Alun Wyn Jones, Geoff Parling, Dan Lydiate, Sam Warburton (c), Jamie Heaslip

Replacements: Richard Hibbard, Ryan Grant, Dan Cole, Tom Croft, Sean O'Brien, Conor Murray, Owen Farrell, Alex Cuthbert
 
Good to see Bowe and Lydiate in the team.

1. Vunipola deserves his chance, but i hope it doesn't effect the scrum too much.
2. I would have had Evans over Parling.
3. Is Phillips injured (not on the bench). Regardless of this you could make a strong case for Youngs coming in even if Phillips was 100% fit.
 
Don't bother posting the team for the rest of us.

Lions: 15-Leigh Halfpenny (Wales), 14-Tommy Bowe (Ireland), 13-Brian O'Driscoll (Ireland), 12-Jonathan Davies (Wales), 11-George North (Wales), 10-Jonathan Sexton (Ireland), 9-Ben Youngs (England, 8-Jamie Heaslip (Ireland), 7-Sam Warburton (Wales, captain), 6-Dan Lydiate (Wales), 5-Geoff Parling (England), 4-Alun Wyn Jones (Wales), 3-Adam Jones (Wales), 2-Tom Youngs (England), 1-Mako Vunipola (England).

Replacements - 16-Richard Hibbard (Wales), 17-Ryan Grant (Scotland), 18-Dan Cole (England), 19-Tom Croft (England), 20-Sean O'Brien (Ireland), 21-Conor Murray (Ireland), 22-Owen Farrell (England), 23-Alex Cuthbert (Wales)

Croft is clearly covering second row on the bench too. He's a bit unlucky to be dropped, but Gatland can't be seen to do what's needed so Croft loses out. Cuthbert is unlucky too, Bowe is better in my book but Cuthbert didn't do much wrong last week

And I just realised I'm not going to see this game.
 
Larry:

How big is the lions tour from an aussies perspective?

I know the tickets for the tests went within a matter of minutes, but a few articles i've read also states that the ARU board really need a good performance from the Aussies team in order to give rugby union a much needed boost over there.

Union seems to be getting bigger in most of the leading nations (crowds + finances), yet in Australia i get the impression that the sport is dying a slow death.
 
The tests have been promoted and reported on fairly well. The games in between, not really. But even the tests are fighting a losing battle against the other sporting codes, that's just the way it is.
From the ticket perspective, EVERY big event in Australia sells out in minutes. The reason being that so few tickets go on general sale. Most are corporate or bought by other distribution agencies. So, the tickets will be made available, a story will do the rounds that they're all sold but, search around and you'll get some. That's not to say the tests aren't genuinely sold out though, they might well be. They will probably end up that way anyway but I doubt they were actually 'sold out' in minutes, I could probably get a ticket now.
The problem for the ARU is the Super Rugby (generally) isn't working for Australian teams. IMO they should withdraw and start a domestic league. There has been a steady decline in standard in the 5 years we have been here, to be honest, it's boring. The Aussie teams have a self-imposed $3M salary cap which the SA & NZ teams don't have and are therefore not restricted by. The Aussie salary cap is not there to promote fair play but to protect the clubs from over-spending. Consequently, Aussie teams lose players to RL, French RU (where the cap is about $9M) and other S15 clubs and these players then can't play for the Wallabies. The salary cap in the NRL is about $7M, AFL is nearly $10M. Has to be said, the Reds were good a few years ago and the Brumbies have been good this year but they're not consistent.
The strength in depth in RU is poor here, bear in mind, there are only 5 teams and they still can't fill them properly with quality players. Contrast that with the strength in depth in NRL and AFL and it's a massive problem. The other codes have absolute conveyor belts of quality kids coming through. Plus, they have tons more cash, both codes have recently signed $1BN TV rights split between free-to-air TV and Fox. The free-to-air TV here don't even bother bidding for the Super Rugby so Fox get it cheap. The Lions tests have been on free-to-air though. The major TV networks, 7 & 9, are run by massive AFL & NRL fans respectively.
The NRL is king in NSW & QLD, AFL rules in Victoria, SA & WA. AFL in Victoria is, quite simply, per capita, the most well-supported sport in the World, bar none. And I mean, bar none. There's 4M people in the State and they all go and watch it. There are about 5 Man Utds in Victorian AFL. Nothing's ever going to compete with that. RL isn't as popular in it's home states, NSW & QLD, but it's certainly as popular, say, as footy is in the UK, probably more so actually.
So, it's difficult and I don't know what the answer is for them. As you say, Worldwide, they do OK but the trend is bucked here. One thing RU can offer a player is a genuine 'World' experience, AFL & NRL cannot. But internally, State of Origin & the AFL Grand Final are like the Superbowl and FA Cup FInal rolled into one.
 
One other thing I meant to say is that, in the UK, RU & RL are very different and people choose which they prefer. Most choose RU.
However, over here, they have spent a lot of time making the S15 as similar as they can to the RL. But it hasn't worked, it's not as good. So, if two products are similar but one is markedly better than the other then, naturally, you'd watch the better one. They should play to Union's strengths a bit more, probably wouldn't lose them any fans.
 
Good to see Bowe and Lydiate in the team.

1. Vunipola deserves his chance, but i hope it doesn't effect the scrum too much.
2. I would have had Evans over Parling.
3. Is Phillips injured (not on the bench). Regardless of this you could make a strong case for Youngs coming in even if Phillips was 100% fit.

Agree 1 and 3. Tempted to agree with 2 also, but Parling's done himself credit on the trip and has earned his chance. The lineout in particular may well improve with him there. The Lions' tight shove will miss a little bit of sheer heft but adding Vunipola should counterbalance that.
 
I think it's inevitable the scrum will be affected but you'd hope it's offset by the all round game Vunipola brings to the table.

Our second row is arguably the deepest position on tour - I actually thought O'Connell was a bit lucky to make it on tour given how little he played in the second half of the season. I don't think we lose anything other than a bit of hard nosed leadership. All the others can do what he does otherwise.

The backrow definitely needed more graft in it so I'm happy Lydiate is there - it might also be a reflection that tactically given how well Australia took away tail line out options from us that we might be content to take what's on offer at 2 and 4. If we're throwing there we'll need to drive the maul a bit better to suck in the back row and Lydiate suits that tighter game.

That would usually be enough to give our midfield room to work in, but Youngs approach will have to change to a pass first one. He has a tendency to look to take on too much ball himself- like Phillips does.

If a bookie would take a bet on a Sexton to Bowe cross kick resulting in a try I'd be all over it this weekend
 
I don't understand the nuances of forward play in Union. But, whenever I see O'Connell play, he is like having 2 men on the pitch. Surely that is a big miss?

I am surprised the Aussies kept O'Connor at 10. The 12 who got injured is a good player, if he's right, he'll get a chance to show that. And Beale is their best full-back. Ioane wasn't fit last time so I doubt they'll miss him, even being their best winger.

They might be stronger this time.
 
Don't get me wrong- O'Connell is great. But there's not a big drop off from him to Parling or any of the other second rows.

And it doesn't create any problems for the Lions in how they approach the game - nothing changes.
 
If the English, Irish and scots players can start to contribute to the scoreboard, i think we'll win the second test.
 
Back
Top Bottom