[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=39969.msg1094452#msg1094452 date=1272409805]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39969.msg1094432#msg1094432 date=1272407818]
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=39969.msg1094407#msg1094407 date=1272403372]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=39969.msg1094314#msg1094314 date=1272398831]
sounds good to me
a) its a bloody good design
b) money wont be wasted (with us footing the bill) designing a new one
c) it will save time as the blasted stadium needs building asap
[/quote]
Is the right answer, although on the great scheme of things I don't think b) will end up that much of an issue.
It shouldn't need to be a stipulation, it's common sense. I would just like to see it be version 1 and not the slightly dumbed down economy version 2.
regards
[/quote]
what dont you like about design mark 2?
[/quote]
It was not that different, the quality of the materials and build was reduced, they did away with the underground car park, which was a bit innovative and reduced some of the outside dimensions slightly, it was great , but not quite as plush as the original one
regards
[/quote]
I agree, I just wanted to hear your views. hopefully they will go with the original plans.