• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Standard Chartered In Trouble.

Status
Not open for further replies.

localny

Very Well-Known
Member
British Bank Accused of Hiding Transactions With Iranians

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/07/b...-of-hiding-transactions-with-iranians.html?hp

Thwarting controls against money laundering, Standard Chartered Bank enabled Iranian banks and corporations to hide roughly 60,000 transactions worth at least $250 billion within the bank, New York state’s banking regulator charged Monday.
The New York State Department of Financial Services accused the British bank, which it called a “rogue institution,” of hiding the transactions in order to gain hundreds of millions of dollars in fees from January 2001 through 2010.

Under United States law, transactions with Iranian banks are strictly monitored and subject to sanctions because of government concerns about the use of American banks to finance Iran’s nuclear programs and terrorist organizations.

The highest levels of management knew that Standard Chartered was deliberately falsifying records to allow billions of dollars in transactions to flood through the bank, according to the regulatory filing.
The bank “left the U.S. financial system vulnerable to terrorists, weapons dealers, drug kingpins and corrupt regimes,” the agency said in an order sent to the bank Monday. At the most extreme, the agency’s enforcement actions against the bank could include the revocation of its license to operate in New York.

Beyond the dealings with Iran, the department said it discovered evidence that Standard Chartered operated “similar schemes” to do business with other countries under United States sanctions, including Burma, Libya and Sudan.

The department, led by Benjamin M. Lawsky, said that it reviewed more than 30,000 bank documents, including internal e-mails, and that it investigated the bank because it had routed the transactions through its New York operations. Under the order, Standard Chartered will have to pay for an independent monitor to ensure its operations comply with state law.

In an e-mailed statement, a spokesman for Standard Chartered said the bank was reviewing its “historical U.S. sanctions compliance and is discussing that review with U.S. enforcement agencies and regulators.” He added that the bank “cannot predict when this review and these discussions will be completed or what the outcome will be.”

The department alleges that Standard Chartered systematically scrubbed any identifying information from the transactions for powerful Iranian institutions, including the Central Bank of Iran and Bank Saderat, that are legally subject to sanctions under United States law.

The department accused the bank of undermining the safety of New York’s financial system through a range of violations including “falsifying business records” and “obstructing governmental administration,” according to the order.

Suspecting that Iranian banks were using their financial institutions to finance its nuclear weapons program, the United States Treasury Department banned certain transactions between Iranian banks and United States financial institutions in 2008. The regulator said the bank engaged in so-called “U-turn” transactions, where a foreign institution routs money to an American bank, which then transfers the money immediately to a separate foreign institution.

The accusations are the latest to strike British banks. In July, a United States Senate panel found that HSBC was used by Iranians looking to evade sanctions and by Mexican drug cartels to funnel money back into the United States.

Together, the allegations raise concerns that there is a broader pattern of illegal money freely flowing into the United States through international financial institutions.

In the Standard Chartered investigation, the order said that the bank’s management created a formalized operating manual that showed staff members how to strip off any information from the transactions that might tie them to the sanctioned Iranian institution. The manual was called “Quality Operating Procedure Iranian Bank Processing.”

Under a strategy dubbed “Project Gazelle,” which the regulator said was approved by the highest echelons of the bank, Standard Chartered falsified or omitted client identification in paperwork authorizing transactions, the order said. To drum up more revenue, the bank wanted to forge “new relationships with Iranian companies,” bank e-mails show.

The order says that executives at Standard Chartered sidelined concerns raised by its management in the United States. Concerned that the bank’s practices ran afoul of regulators and could lead to criminal liability, executives at Standard Chartered urged a thorough accounting of the bank’s Iranian business, according to an e-mail uncovered as part of the investigation.

Rather than quashing the program once concerns were raised, executives at Standard Chartered got better at shielding the wire transfers and other transactions, according to the order. What’s more, the regulator said Monday, the bank responded to calls for a review with outright hostility.

A London executive of the bank was quoted in the document as having directed an expletive at Americans and adding, “Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we’re not going to deal with Iranians?”

By falsifying records and lying to regulators, the regulator alleged, Standard Chartered conducted a widespread conspiracy continuing for almost 10 years.

Source: NEW YORK TIMES
 
Ha!

Referring to the furore over the Libor rate fixing Chairman Sir John Peace said:
“In recent weeks, issues have surfaced around governance and behaviour in banking “At Standard Chartered, we believe it is not just about what we do, but how we do it. Our culture and values continue to be a source of strength and a competitive advantage.

 
Is it money laundering, or do the sanctions apply to any trade with Iran?

It's well funny this. Standard Chartered telling the regulators to get fucked while the stock tumbles. All very Suarez.
 
Typical American chutpaz chucking their weight around - last time I lookes S C is a worldwide british bank and not subject to imposing US sanctions.
 
Nope. If you deal in the US then you're subject to their laws. But even madder, I'm doing a load of work on something called FATCA at the minute for british banks - it's new US legislation that says that every financial institution in the world needs to report any financial transaction of any yank anywhere ever. If you don't, they'll extradite the bank execs. Even if you don't trade / never will trade in the US.
 
Typical American chutpaz chucking their weight around - last time I lookes S C is a worldwide british bank and not subject to imposing US sanctions.

What's chutpaz?

I'm pretty sure the Brits are also imposing the sanctions ...
 
Nope. If you deal in the US then you're subject to their laws. But even madder, I'm doing a load of work on something called FATCA at the minute for british banks - it's new US legislation that says that every financial institution in the world needs to report any financial transaction of any yank anywhere ever. If you don't, they'll extradite the bank execs. Even if you don't trade / never will trade in the US.

How the fuck can they do that? It's got fuck all to do with them if they don't trade there, so any extradition would be illegal surely?

They've tried to do similar with Internet servers based outside the us & been told to fuck off by the world as a whole, though one assumes banking is a lot more complex, what with it being run by a bunch of bankers.
 
I dunno dude, but the guys running the projects I'm working on are taking it pretty damn seriously.

The US are going to be the first country to tax by citizenship. So even if you move and are working in another country and paying tax there, you still need to pay the US for the fact that you were born there. The EU is watching and taking notes. Every developed country is drowning in debt and would love to copy the model, so every country is playing ball with the experiment.
 
According to Radio 4 this morning they come into the equation when you deal in dollars regardless of where.

That aside I'm amused to see that the immediate reaction is to get all touchy about the Americans (doesn't take much for people England to go on a "fucking Yanks" tirade though to be fair) rather than question whether there is any truth to a British institution breaking sanctions and dealing with Iran.
 
Is it money laundering, or do the sanctions apply to any trade with Iran?

It's well funny this. Standard Chartered telling the regulators to get fucked while the stock tumbles. All very Suarez.

Don't think a bank like Standard Chartered will worry that much about US regulators - probably pay a fine if found guilty properly but it looks like they will put up a fight. Also they are a very old bank from what I have read on the BBC with only 10% of their business in Armericas - so they probably don't give a shit if they lose their license in the US.
 
According to Radio 4 this morning they come into the equation when you deal in dollars regardless of where.

That aside I'm amused to see that the immediate reaction is to get all touchy about the Americans (doesn't take much for people England to go on a "fucking Yanks" tirade though to be fair) rather than question whether there is any truth to a British institution breaking sanctions and dealing with Iran.

I think the grip is that the Americans are acting world police on it. If the bank has broken sanctions surely it's something that should be dealt with by the British authorities? Unless of course these transactions we're organised in America. I suppose with the global and electronic nature of banking now days, it all gets a bit confusing anyway.
 
You used to be able to with the Carlsberg ones, something about Muslims. Hang on, what about usury and all that?
 
I think you could only buy child shirts without the sponsor on.

We only wore sponsorless shirts in France because alcohol sponsors were banned there.

This might be bollocks, but it's what I remember.
 
I think the grip is that the Americans are acting world police on it. If the bank has broken sanctions surely it's something that should be dealt with by the British authorities? Unless of course these transactions we're organised in America. I suppose with the global and electronic nature of banking now days, it all gets a bit confusing anyway.

Well all I can surmise from that is that you don't know much of anything but figured having a go at America is the cool thing to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom