• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Stadium News, part 793

Status
Not open for further replies.

gkmacca

6CM Addict
Member
I can't see this anywhere, so apologies if it's been posted before!

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-fc-150m-application-cards-4186741

249034_4548565806854_910170292_n.jpg


Reds' new move in £150m Anfield stadium plan
7 Jun 2013 07:54
£150m application to redevelop Anfield on cards before next season.

Liverpool FC are set to submit a planning application for the proposed £150million redevelopment of Anfield before the start of next season.

The ECHO understands just ‘a handful’ of around 90 houses which need to be demolished to make way for the ambitious expansion plans have yet to be purchased.

Since the Reds announced last October their intention to stay at Anfield rather than build a new stadium in Stanley Park, Liverpool City Council and social housing developer Your Housing Group have led negotiations with residents.

Significant progress has now been made and Liverpool hope the remaining properties will be acquired over the next two months.

Once that has been achieved they will enter the planning process as they seek permission to push on with the refurbishment which will see the Main Stand and Anfield Road end expanded to increase the ground's capacity to around 60,000.

Reds managing director Ian Ayre said: “We are in an interesting period in terms of our aspirations around the stadium.

“Our goal is to extend Anfield. But we need certainty and that comes with the acquisition of properties.

“Real progress has been made in acquiring them. Once they have all been acquired we will go through the planning process. We would expect to be in a position to make that a certainty this summer. Once planning has been achieved then we can start construction.”

Ayre believes a redeveloped Anfield is vital to Liverpool’s hopes of competing financially with the Premier League’s elite.

“There are three core revenue streams – media, commercial and matchday,” he added.

“Our media and commercial revenues are very impressive but where we fall behind is our matchday revenues. Having a bigger stadium and playing in the Champions League are two mechanisms which would dramatically change our fortunes. We’re determined to press on with the stadium solution. It’s in the hands of other people but hopefully we will get there and deliver what our fans want.”

Liverpool owners Fenway Sports Group have been vocal advocates of Financial Fair Play (FFP) which seeks to ensure clubs live within their means.

UEFA’s rules, which come into full effect in 2013/14, state that clubs must break even over a three-year period or face exclusion from European competitions.

The Premier League have also brought in their own set of regulations from next season.

Ayre believes if the rules are enforced correctly then Liverpool are well placed to flourish over the coming years. We are very supportive of FFP for a number of reasons,” he said. “One is we believe you should only spend what you earn. We want there to be as level a playing field as possible.

“We are in a very fortunate position in that we generate some of the biggest revenues in football despite having not been as successful on the pitch as we would have liked in recent years.

“We also have a huge fan base around the world. We’ve sold 100,000 tickets at the MCG in Australia this summer and there has been a similar demand for tickets for the other pre-season tour matches in Jakarta and Bangkok. That bodes well in an FFP environment. The real challenge for UEFA is to ensure the rules are applied correctly. It’s only going to work effectively if there are sanctions for those who don’t abide by them.”

 
So basically, the same news that's been repeated a million times before
 
Well, it sounds like they HAVE actually made progress buying the properties. I was expecting that to drag on for ages yet.
 
I wouildn't describe 90 houses as a handful!

I've struggled through any cynicism and I'm glad we're seeing some movement on this.

I can't wait to hear 60,000 Liverpool fans singing YNWA at Anfield when we're back in the Champions League.
 
Most of those houses probably belong to Robbie Fowler so buying them shouldn't be too much of a hassle.
 
No it says only a handful of the 90 that will be purchased still need to be purchased.
 
Now curiosity is eating me up. Lothair Road has only 30-40 houses surely & Annie Road hasn't much, where else are we annexing?
 
The handful that are still to be purchased have been holding out for years. It's not like they just bought 84 last week and they'll get the 6 done tomorrow. Most of the 84 went aeons ago and the 6 don't want to go anywhere. LFC have been cunts about the whole thing.

Liverpool are arguing that the market value is X and so offering that. The residents are saying the market value is only X coz everyone fucked off years ago because of the shithole that LFC left the place by buying properties and leaving them vacant to turn into squats, driving property values down.
 
I'm not saying you're wrong but if that's true it's a truly bizarre strategy by the club. What is the difference between the old market value and the depressed one on 6 poxy houses in Anfield? £500k at the absolute, crazily extreme, valuation. That's buttons in the context of a £150m project the delay of which costs the club millions each year. Doesn't sound plausible to me as an explanation of the delay.
 
It will all come down to two really, really, stubborn residents: Mr D. Oldham and his nephew next door.
 
I've been to Anfield a few times but is it normally a bad neighbourhood?
 
Anfield didn't look run down? Compared to where, exactly? Baghdad?

Hahahaha. I had the pleasure of living there (Rockfield road) for a few months. My girlfriend's family decided to live because it was too rough. They had lived in canny farm before that. That's how bad Anfield was/is.
 
Apologies for the illegal bumping, but this is today's news that's more or less like June's news, so I think it really benefits from being linked together:


Liverpool owner Henry: We have £150m ready for redevelopment of Anfield

By JOHN DRAYTON
PUBLISHED: 08:45, 11 September 2013 | UPDATED: 08:45, 11 September 2013



Liverpool have the £150million required to finance the expansion of Anfield from 45,000 capacity to 60,000 just as soon as planning permission is granted.

Club owner John W Henry has moved to allay fears that a repeat of the fiasco under his predecessors Tom Hicks and George Gillett Jnr - which saw plans for a new stadium shelved due to lack of finance - could occur.

article-2417263-1B911DEF000005DC-924_634x329.jpg

Mersey makeover: Liverpool want to expand Anfield to increase capacity from 45,000 to 60,000

article-2417263-1BA260F5000005DC-407_306x423.jpg

Money man: Henry says the cash is ready for Anfield development

Liverpool, in conjunction with the local council are buying up properties around Anfield before construction begins.

And while the selling of naming rights are not an option for the club, Henry says the required cash will be available as soon the green light is given for construction to begin.

'They (Hicks and Gillett) were talking about going out and borrowing an enormous amount of money for an enormous facility,' Henry told the Independent.

'One of their problems is they weren't able to get financing. That's not what we are doing here. When (the planning permission goes in), that won't be the problem.'

All but eight of the 30 privately-owned houses needed to begin demolition have been acquired and Henry is confident progress will be made on the remaining properties soon.

'The number of properties is being reduced,' Henry said. 'We've always said you have to have certainty with regards to the properties because of the height of the stands and all the issues regarding that. That has been the biggest issue.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...eded-redevelopment-Anfield.html#ixzz2eZSiSYLa
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Henry positive over £150m Anfield redevelopment

ESPN staffSeptember 11, 2013

Liverpool's principal owner John W Henry says that the money is in place for Fenway Sports Group to embark on a £150 million redevelopment of Anfield.

Henry has declared that the project is on track, and that there will be no repeat of the stalled stadium projects that plagued the regime of previous owners Tom Hicks and George Gillett. He is also adamant that the expansion of Anfield - which is set to increase its capacity to 60,000 - will not compromise squad strengthening.

Fenway announced last October that the club were scrapping plans to build a new stadium on neighbouring Stanley Park, and would instead refurbish their current home.

Anfield is hemmed in by housing, though, and progress on the project has depended on the acquisition and demolition of privately-owned homes next to the ground to create extra space for expansion.

The club will submit a planning application to extend the Main Stand and Anfield Road End once Liverpool city council has agreed deals to buy the few remaining houses adjoining the stadium, with Henry insisting that "good progress" is being made on that front.

Liverpool chairman Tom Werner held discussions with council officials over the project during a visit to Merseyside last week.

Henry is aware of the troubles faced by Hicks and Gillett, who secured planning permission for a new stadium but then failed to find the money to build it.

The Boston-based businessman insists that there are no such financial issues with the current proposal, which is part of a wider regeneration project for the Anfield area, being run in partnership with the council and social housing provider Your Housing.

He told the Liverpool Daily Post: "They [Hicks and Gillett] were talking about going out and borrowing an enormous amount of money for an enormous facility. That's not what we are doing here. One of their problems is that they weren't able to get financing.

"When this project happens, that won't be the problem. We just need certainty with regard to these properties. The number of properties is being reduced. The city council is doing everything they can and that's all we can ask.

"Not just the city council but Your Housing and everyone associated with this are all on the same page. The regeneration as well; we're all on the same page. We are making good progress."

Asked if the redevelopment would have a negative effect on the club's transfer budget, Henry said: "No, because it will pay for itself. It's actually a positive. It's one of the reasons we are doing it. It still provides excess cash. This is the direction that makes financial sense for the club in the long term."

Liverpool are refusing to say when they will be in a position to apply for planning permission, with Henry explaining that it depends on how quickly the council can agree a deal to buy the remaining houses next to the ground.

A handful of homeowners have yet to agree to sell up, with compulsory purchase orders an option for the club if no other resolution can be found.

Henry said: "We've always said you have to have certainty with regards to the properties because of the height of the stands and all the issues regarding that. That has been the biggest issue. We need certainty on that."



Read more at http://www.espn.co.uk/espn/sport/story/237069.html#uFWVEsA82PO1dCy1.99
 
The handful that are still to be purchased have been holding out for years. It's not like they just bought 84 last week and they'll get the 6 done tomorrow. Most of the 84 went aeons ago and the 6 don't want to go anywhere. LFC have been cunts about the whole thing.

Liverpool are arguing that the market value is X and so offering that. The residents are saying the market value is only X coz everyone fucked off years ago because of the shithole that LFC left the place by buying properties and leaving them vacant to turn into squats, driving property values down.


Why the fuck don't we offer the 6 market rate plus 10-20%? Surely it's only about 1-2millquid?! What's all the fucking around
 
we probably have, I reckon theres a bunch of auld people round there that dont give a fuck about more money or lfc
 
Tbh regards this issue (& any long running slow issue) I don't see the problem bumping, except when it starts getting out off hand with very long threads.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom