• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

So Dithering old Hodgson didn't have much to do with Cole signing..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly Ali, if you’re NOT anti-Hodgson, that does not come across in your posts… Lot’s of ‘big deal’ and ‘he’s done nowt yet’ posts, without anything even cautiously positive (that I’ve seen – I’ve not read every post you’ve ever made). Like in speaking of Mascher’s imminent departure, you did say “…it will depend on how he somehow rectifies the massive hole in our midfield, shortly after making it even bigger.†Certainly worded like Roy has some part in Mascher wanting to leave us.

Like you, I don’t think getting giddy is appropriate, but neither is pretending that we’re not doing better (maybe MUCH better) than many feared we would be at this point in the summer. In May, it was a genuine concern that we’d lose Mascher AND Gerrard AND Torres. As it is, we’re going to lose only one of them (the one that we could most afford to lose), and we’ve actually improved at two positions (Cole V Yossi and Young V Insua), so let’s not decree that NOTHING worth some positivity has taken place. You’re right that once Mascher leaves, it’s critical that Roy addresses the gaping hole that we’ll then have in midfield, but I’m not panicing yet… I think he knows what he’s doing, and I’m sure that he is already moving towards making that happen.

You know that Steven Gerrard is still amoung the best players in the world, mate. He may not be quite as dominant as he was a year or two ago, but if we let it be known that he was available, there’d be a line around Anfield to try and get him. Claiming anything else is just silly. And although you say that there’s little evidence that Roy had anything to do with the signing / ‘stayings’ this summer, I disagree… As I said before, I don’t think that ANY of JC, SG or FT would be here now, were Rafa, not Roy in charge. And although that’s speculation on my part, so too is your stance on the matter, and I can point to the body language and attitude of players last season suggesting that there is at least some reason to suspect that, without a change in manager, SG and FT would be gone.

Unlike you, I feel that Roy has done most of what he’s be able to do so far very well. Good signings, an improved team, our big two staying, deadwood sold off… Yes, he will need to address other areas too, but let’s give him the chance to do so, shall we? I feel he’s done well with what he has addressed so far. Do you disagree? At the start of the summer, we all agreed that we needed (in no particular order) more creativity, a better LB and a decent second CF. For me, we’ve addressed all of those needs so far, and we’re improved in each category. No, I’m not telling you that Young and what’s-his-name are superstars and that we’re going to win the league now, but we are better than before… And given our situation, that’s about all that we can realistically hope for at the moment.

For me, it’s simply ‘so far, so good’, is all that I’m saying. I think that Roy has pretty much done all that can be expected of him to this point, and maybe more, given that nobody thought we’d get near Joe Cole. Remember, he inherited this situation. He did not create it. You’re right that there’s a lot more to be done, but Rome wasn’t built in a day, and he’s gotta start somewhere. But many, yourself included amoung them, seem particularly loath to give him any credit at all, as if until every single issue is addressed, he’ll not have done anything right…

Finally, take the ‘we’re not sold yet’ point out of the equation. We all know that we need that to happen. From a ‘What we expected’ Vs ‘Where we are today’ as it relates to only our playing staff (ie. what Roy has at least some control over), would you have taken this back in May?

‘Cos I’ll tell you something - I may not be giddy, but I’m optimistic and excited about football again. I’m not dreading the next game, anticipating (and usually correctly) a poor performance, negative tactics and passionless players. And it’s been a while since I’ve felt this way. If you’d offered THAT to me in May, I’d have bitten your f$%!ing hand off.
 
There's a difference between saying had Rafa been here, Torres/Gerrard would be gone, and saying that Hodgson is the reason why they've stayed. Hodgson himself said that Torres had no issue with him, his issues were to do with the club, the sale, and hence it was Purslow who had to make the sales pitch for him to stay one year.

Your construction of my point about Mascher leaving, and Hodgson having to fix our midfield mess, is just simply not how I intended it.

There's been a lot of "he hasn't done much yet" posts from me, because he hasn't done much yet. That isn't a criticism of his performance, it's just a simple fact. When you don't have much if any money to spend, you have to sell to buy. Until he sells Mascherano, and buys a replacement, his biggest issue of the whole summer will not be resolved.

All we've seen so far is incremental gains, and you are saying, well, that's all that can be expected. Well, incremental gains on last season won't get us through to 4th place. Our talent underperformed last season, but it was also crippled in midfield.

We need to make the purchases that will alter the balance of our team. We also unfortunately need to make a bunch of like for like swaps and add depth in certain positions. The latter is important, but the former is a primary concern. If our midfield is the same or worse than last year, Cole being slightly better than Yossi isn't going to enter into it, even when our best team is out. Cole won't have the ball, or he won't have support.
 
[quote author=Farkmaster link=topic=41168.msg1144143#msg1144143 date=1280339525]
There's a difference between saying had Rafa been here, Torres/Gerrard would be gone, and saying that Hodgson is the reason why they've stayed. Hodgson himself said that Torres had no issue with him, his issues were to do with the club, the sale, and hence it was Purslow who had to make the sales pitch for him to stay one year.

Well, considering that if they HADN'T stayed, many would have immediately jumped on the "See..?!? Roy isn't high profile enough to persuade our superstars to stay", I'm gonna give him at least some credit for that, even if you won't. 'Cos let's not pretend that if SG and FT and JC hadn't wanted to play for Roy, they simply wouldn't be here.

Your construction of my point about Mascher leaving, and Hodgson having to fix our midfield mess, is just simply not how I intended it.

Fair enough. But it was your construction of the sentence, and you can see how that sentiment came across...

There's been a lot of "he hasn't done much yet" posts from me, because he hasn't done much yet. That isn't a criticism of his performance, it's just a simple fact. When you don't have much if any money to spend, you have to sell to buy. Until he sells Mascherano, and buys a replacement, his biggest issue of the whole summer will not be resolved.

I disagree. Job 1 for Roy was to get our stars to stay. And again I say that he's done all that could be expected when it comes to JM, SG and FT. And then he's done better than anybody thought he would be getting JC in, too. How you can say that he's not done anything, when he's at least contributed in ensure that we don't lose SG and FT is beyond me.

All we've seen so far is incremental gains, and you are saying, well, that's all that can be expected. Well, incremental gains on last season won't get us through to 4th place. Our talent underperformed last season, but it was also crippled in midfield.

Again, I disagree. That squad should have come 3rd or 4th last season. And with the addition of JC to a hopefully fit SG, AA and FT, with improvements made in other positions on the field, I expect us to be right back in the hunt for European Cup places next season. But even if we don't, we have improved... The alternative is not improving, or regressing.

We need to make the purchases that will alter the balance of our team. We also unfortunately need to make a bunch of like for like swaps and add depth in certain positions. The latter is important, but the former is a primary concern. If our midfield is the same or worse than last year, Cole being slightly better than Yossi isn't going to enter into it, even when our best team is out. Cole won't have the ball, or he won't have support.

[/quote]

If the midfield this season is (for the most part) consisting of SG, AA, JC, DK, Maxi and an addition or two (Lee Cattermole maybe) using the Mascher fee), we can be a more effective team, stronger in attack than before. Your ubber-negative outlook in that last paragraph is very strange to me... I just don't see the grounds for it.
 
The grounds for it are that we had players of similar quality and skill sets, or the same exact players in the same exact positions last year, and failed.

It will be of immense significance to see who replaces Mascherano, and how Hodgson builds a team with that replacement and the players you've outlined, who don't really provide width, who aren't particularly fast, and in many cases, tend to occupy the same positions.

That's the real question of the summer for me.

That's not negativity. That's wondering what you are going to do after you are finished ripping much of the spine of the team out over the last two years.
 
Understand where you're coming from, but I see a couple of differences...

1. Last season's performance wasn't a true indication of the quality of our team, hence the outrage and outcry. With a new manager who hasn't lost much of the squad, I expect to see us return to a level more indicitive of our personel.

2. 2009 Vs 2010 midfield: Cole > Yossi / Riera. '10 SG (should be) > '09 SG. '10 Aqua > Lucas / '09 Aqua (Yes, I would rather have Mascher). '10 DK = '09 DK. '10 Maxi = '09 Maxi. What's-his-name > N'gog.

I'm not telling you to prepare for a victory parade... I just saying that I think we're better than we were 3 months back, with a far more optimistic outlook than we could have reasonably expected, considering.
 
I'm getting a bit freaked out that so many players are leaving but Lucas is clearly staying. We can't hope to return to the 2008-2009 level of play with Lucas starting every game.
 
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=41168.msg1144190#msg1144190 date=1280344542]
Understand where you're coming from, but I see a couple of differences...

1. Last season's performance wasn't a true indication of the quality of our team, hence the outrage and outcry. With a new manager who hasn't lost much of the squad, I expect to see us return to a level more indicitive of our personel.

2. 2009 Vs 2010 midfield: Cole > Yossi / Riera. '10 SG (should be) > '09 SG. '10 Aqua > Lucas / '09 Aqua (Yes, I would rather have Mascher). '10 DK = '09 DK. '10 Maxi = '09 Maxi. What's-his-name > N'gog.

I'm not telling you to prepare for a victory parade... I just saying that I think we're better than we were 3 months back, with a far more optimistic outlook than we could have reasonably expected, considering.
[/quote]

As I said, I accept that the team underperformed last year, but there were also fundamental issues you could see in how we set out every game. The variety of combinations involving Lucas/Mascherano/Gerrard/Aquilani did not make for a good central midfield.

If anything, your comparison, for me, shows how little has changed. When I play your game of paper football with those players, I don't feel that encouraged at present. That's the point though, all I'm saying is that this is a pretty stupid time to analyse how well Hodgson has done, let alone say he's played a blinder.

I'm left thinking that we sold one of our more effective players from two years ago in Riera for nothing, one of the only players we have that provides natural width, and got a striker cum left winger who is nowhere near as helpful in defense, and will require a very good purchase at LB, were we to play with him. Same goes for Cole, who isn't one to defend either. If instead you consider we replaced Yossi with Cole, for me, that's a nothing, like for like substitution, and on paper, it's Cole who has been less productive recently.

Lucas is still with us. The rest is the same.

That sounds depressing, but it isn't, because the summer isn't over, in fact for us, given we have always had to sell to buy, it's barely begun. Is it so insane to remark on this fact?
 
Why will you not agree that having SG and FT and JC is better than NOT having them, and therefore, for this reason alone, Roy HAS done quite a bit already? He’s at least part of the reason they’re here, and they make us better than we’d be without any or all of them? I don’t understand how you cannot (or will not) appreciate that this was a large victory for us Vs where we thought we’d be now…

Funny how we have such polar-opposite views on this… When I look at the midfield comparisons, I can’t help but feel that we can only get better. Yes, last year we were shite, but we had an injured and unmotivated SG, an injured Aquilani, Lucas (‘nuff said) and Mascher. For me, though the loss of Mascher will be a big one, SG and Aqua cannot be as bad as they were last season, and anything is a more creative and attacking combination than the Lucas / Mascher pairing that we saw for lots of last season. Also, though I love him too, Mascher is not the only bloke who can win the ball in the middle of the park – We WILL have lots of possession next season.

You obviously don’t rate Cole as highly as I do. No point in trying to change your mind there, though I think it’s a quite substantial upgrade (especially on the woefully out-of-form Yossi that stumbled his way through the 2nd half of last season). And yes, two years ago, Riera was very effective, but he wasn’t up to much last year, and he didn’t have much speed with which to take advantage of the natural width that he gave us… I guess that I’m not too worried about losing attacking players, who’s main ‘pro’ is that they defend well.

Anyways, we’re just coming at this from vastly different positions. I feel that yours is a very (almost deliberately) negative one, where you refuse to acknowledge what he HAS done because it’s not ALL done yet. And if you feel that summer has “barely begun†for us, I do wonder what your expectations are, and if they’re compatible with the situation in which we find ourselves..?
 
Of course I think it's good that Gerrard and Torres are still here, though I didn't expect they'd both leave, and I don't think Hodgson had much to do with it, other than his NOT being Benitez.

My expectations are very compatible, and our summer has barely begun. This isn't because I think we've lots of money to spend, obviously we don't.

We've sold a bunch of players and spent little of that money. We're going to sell Mascherano, and then spend that money. We are selling, then buying. The meat of our decision making is still to come, because we haven't sold the brunt of the assets we'll be selling yet, in terms of value, and we haven't spent much of that at all as of yet.
 
So far so good sums it up Dallas Reddapie.

Who knows if it'll go well on the field, but so far...it's more than I expected. Didn't expect to see Roy hold onto the boys.

you've got to think people are happy to have a boss, who might put the arm around you in charge.

Loved Rafa, but couldn't understand why he'd drop people and not explain it...
 
I'd say Gerrard is fond of that style of management. Houllier was an 'arm round the shoulder' type of guy and Gerrard loved that.
 
We underperformed last year but then we also overperformed the year before. Our true level isn't what we see saw at the tail end of the 08/09 season, particularly given that Alonso and one or two others are missing. I would hope to see a big improvement next season simply because it's hard to imagine to us being any worse but in reality it's hard to know what to expect anymore.

As far as the summer is going, it's very much a case of wait and see. We've made a decent signing in Cole and that coupled with the fact that Gerrard and Torres are staying is cause for some optimism, however we've got some real serious issues to address before the close of the window and whilst some people on here are very much taking for granted that they'll get adequately resolved, others are being a bit more tentative about things (like Fark), which is perfectly fine. I don't understand why he's getting a hard time for being negative.
 
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41168.msg1144297#msg1144297 date=1280353893]
We underperformed last year but then we also overperformed the year before. Our true level isn't what we see saw at the tail end of the 08/09 season, particularly given that Alonso and one or two others are missing. I would hope to see a big improvement next season simply because it's hard to imagine to us being any worse but in reality it's hard to know what to expect anymore.

A team that featured Reina, Carra, Alonso, Gerrard, Mascherano and Torres didn't over-perform, Keni... We should have won the league that season. We were good enough.

As far as the summer is going, it's very much a case of wait and see. We've made a decent signing in Cole and that coupled with the fact that Gerrard and Torres are staying is cause for some optimism, however we've got some real serious issues to address before the close of the window and whilst some people on here are very much taking for granted that they'll get adequately resolved, others are being a bit more tentative about things (like Fark), which is perfectly fine. I don't understand why he's getting a hard time for being negative.
[/quote]

I'm debating him because he seems to be deliberately negative in the face of some really quite positive recent activity...

Just because some other bad stuff MAY happen, and things are still far from perfect at the club, that doesn't negate the fact that things are actually quite a bit better for us now than most of us expected they would be. I'd rather focus on the unexpected good stuff that's happened and be happy (even if it's short lived) than remain gloomy about certain situations that have yet to happen, and may not at all.

I'm not taking anything for granted, and I don't expect miracles between now and Arsenal. But considering I expected to start that match without Torres, Gerrard and Mascherano, I'll take what we've got at the moment. And I'll not declare losing Mascherano as the end of our season before it even begins until I see what we do with the money he brings in... Replacing him IS critical, obviously. But so was retaining Gerrard and Torres, and we've done that pretty well so far.

That's all.
 
So people used to write it was the youth system where Benitez would leave legacy, if that is true and we have some talent in our ranks maybe them supplementing the squad will allow the Mascherano money to be spent on Juan Mata or Kwadko Asomoah. I think the success of this and the next season lies with how Hodgson manages the youth that Rafa spent however much time assembling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom