• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Six more signings and 135 million War Chest?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the Spurs comparison is a very bad one, but it's being used over and over again.

They spent a lot of money replacing their one world class player with several young, new to the league players. They hooked a manager who had alienated several players, had only been there a season and had failed in his last job, midway through the season - then replaced him with an inexperienced stop-gap who did a decent job but wasn't up to the job in the end.

The difference between losing their one and only world class player and replacing him with several new players during a disjointed, destabilising season was 3 points was it not?

Did Spurs, under the circumstances, really have such a bad season? Is there predicament for 2013/14 really comparable to Liverpool's of 2014/15? Not in my opinion.


IMO Spurs just spent in the wrong areas. It baffled me. They managed to have about 12 good midfielders and no decent centre halves or strikers.

It was a bizarre attempt at squad-building.
 
I think, to be fair to Spurs, a few of those players might yet come good too, they've at least got a solid squad to work with and build on. I agree though, it's being done to death and misused.
 
IMO Spurs just spent in the wrong areas. It baffled me. They managed to have about 12 good midfielders and no decent centre halves or strikers.

It was a bizarre attempt at squad-building.

It was, but it also wasn't particularly unsuccessful either - they took a sideways step thanks to Bale's performances papering over those other cracks.

But under the right circumstances, with a couple of squad additions in the right area, their squad has a lot of potential under Potechinno and their rebuilding could begin to look like much better business.
 
IMO Spurs just spent in the wrong areas. It baffled me. They managed to have about 12 good midfielders and no decent centre halves or strikers.

It was a bizarre attempt at squad-building.

Yeah, I think that was the main issue, they overstocked on the midfield, overspent on a slow striker and ignored their piss-poor backline.
 
I'd hope the club does indeed take the Spurs example seriously. It's a Gibbonesque lesson. We need a striker. We're really thin at every level in that sense. But otherwise, given the recent and imminent signings, I'd rather see us hold something back for the January window than go too mad now. Yes, the January market tends to be erratic and over-priced, but in a world cup summer so is this window, and we might need to change something in a few months time. Spurs couldn't even do that. I think it will take at least a couple of windows to sort the wheat from the chaff as far as our defence is concerned. We've got about four right backs, five centre backs and two or three left backs if you include the youngsters. It's high time there's some cleaning out the clutter there.
 
I'd hope the club does indeed take the Spurs example seriously. It's a Gibbonesque lesson.

Yes, the way seemingly secured every single target they went after and insisted on doing all their business before announcing Bale's departure was certainly well handled.
 
Watching the Hansen documentary last night and seeing the banter between him, Kenny and Souness and then also Lawrenson showed that you need quality but also a tight nit group.

We must ensure that whoever comes in is going to be a team player.
 
Yes, the way seemingly secured every single target they went after and insisted on doing all their business before announcing Bale's departure was certainly well handled.

I think it's obvious what people are saying, regardless of what it did for them in the longterm. There's a fair point to be made in that they could have invested in areas more wisely. They sold Bale and spent £100m plus to step sideways, it's hardly a resounding success story.
 
The worry is that they're marquee signing, Lamela, who we Emre all gutted they got, turned out to be a complete bust. They might as well have not signed him. Plus, he was the direct replacement.

I worry we do likewise with an 'emerging' talent.
 
Dunno....Lamela could still turn out to be a good player. He is a young player. Bale took the better part of two seasons to get settled in the team.
 
I think it's obvious what people are saying, regardless of what it did for them in the longterm. There's a fair point to be made in that they could have invested in areas more wisely. They sold Bale and spent £100m plus to step sideways, it's hardly a resounding success story.

Absolutely, that point is an obvious one but it needs some perspective - it was a sideways step not a backwards step for whatever reason. They did their business quick, they replaced Bale and they maintained their level through a managerial change. Could they have done better? Yes. Did they capitulate as is painted? No.

Let's not forget they were never going to address all their problems in one window, so I'm not surprised that they focussed on attempting to replace Bale's attacking threat.

I'm starting to sound like a Spurs fan now!
 
Still hard to believe Bale was a struggling full back at Spurs, and as far as I recall whenever he played Spurs never won. He came close to being sold to QPR or Birmingham or some shit like that.

And he's now the most expensive player of all time.
 
Rodgers was quoted in June as saying quality over quantity , I fact somebody posted a rehashed version of the quote the other day, does this not fly in the face of that Rodgers comment?
 
Rodgers was quoted in June as saying quality over quantity , I fact somebody posted a rehashed version of the quote the other day, does this not fly in the face of that Rodgers comment?


Maybe he thinks he's found a lot of quality.
 
I hope we don't feel pressured into spending all this money. Someone (maybe Macca) said that we should hold back some funds for January or even next summer and I think that's a really good idea. We've got a lot of question marks in the squad right now and it'd be prudent to save some money in case some of those need answering by dipping into the transfer market again.
 
i'm obviously pretty gutted about the signings we seem to be making. it is almost identical to the spurs situation.
 
But we cannot afford to wait a season for our equivalent to deliver


Depends what our objectives are.

Now that Suarez is gone we don't have anyone left really at the peak of their powers who we need to make the most of. It's a young team that have got a good few years ahead of them as a group.
 
I hope we don't feel pressured into spending all this money. Someone (maybe Macca) said that we should hold back some funds for January or even next summer and I think that's a really good idea. We've got a lot of question marks in the squad right now and it'd be prudent to save some money in case some of those need answering by dipping into the transfer market again.

Problem with that is footballers are highly inflationary assets. I think there's probably more to lose by not shopping now.
 
"war chest"

It's more annoying than a best xi is to Ryan

Anyway generally we seem to sign youngish players with a lot of scope to improve and the odd experienced player

We'll sign a young english keeper, a CB, a LB, two strikers and a winger
 
Prices go up, so money buys a bit less.

You forego any benefit you'd get this season from any player you buy now. This season is set to be a very tight race for the CL. Next season the tv money is about £50m. So in order to be able to spend say £20m a bit more judiciously - let's call that a £10m benefit at the maximum, we might have to sacrifice £50m of income.
 
Jeez. I did this before in another thread a week or so ago and it came to £135m exactly. It's not like there is suddenly an extra £50m that hasn't been allocated so no need to get excited (I wonder if that journo has been reading my posts) ?

Can £10m (done)
Origi £10m
Lallana £16m (rising to £25m)(done)
Lambert £4m (done)
Markovic £20m (done).
Lovren £20m (if bid accepted)
___________

Total to date £89m
(assuming all completed)

We know there is another £16m in the tank for Moreno as the bid has been lodged (though Davies @ £10m is being reported as a target) and there was £30m for Sanchez (certain to be diverted to alternative target) so : Total Potential Spend up to £135m
 
i'm obviously pretty gutted about the signings we seem to be making. it is almost identical to the spurs situation.

The number of times you have been gutted about the signings we have made and still come back alive makes you a messiah of Jesus like proportions.
 
There's a shit storm on twitter because one of the "ITKs" said were in for Reus. I know its all bullshit, but why do this to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom