• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Rodgers' wife wants 51 house and half his wages.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brendan probably wasn't exactly a looker when they met either. He only recently got new teeth and lost weight.

Stupid Sexy Rodgers.

That's not how it works though. Rodgers isn't banging young birds because he's got his teeth done, it's coz he manages us.
 
I'm looking forward to a nice shiraz from Langhorne Creek, which is fast becoming my favourite Australian place.

Check out wines from these labels if you can find them :

Bremerton
Heartland
Bleasdale
Lake Breeze

It's a very interesting region - really good wines, but isn't as recognised as neighbouring McLaren Vale & Barossa.

Very good for Cabernet too.

You can get more value out of the region.
 
You're a wise man skully- with great taste.

In wine at least [emoji6]

I didn't really know. I've liked all the glaetzer label stuff I've tried - the Amon-ra one was awesome. Never come across the other stuff but I'll deffo get on the case.
 
You're currently using the 'you get a fixed percentage of my earnings and assets for services renedered' line at the moment, then?

No.... I think I'm using the "you're welcome to half of the fuck all I have..... except for the wine..... that's mine..... oh and the comic books.... They're mine too".

The former is usually an issue.... so I have a stash of shit wine in case I need to give some up.
 
"Nice Shiraz" is a contradiction in terms.


ken.jpg
 
Check out wines from these labels if you can find them :

Bremerton
Heartland
Bleasdale
Lake Breeze

It's a very interesting region - really good wines, but isn't as recognised as neighbouring McLaren Vale & Barossa.

Very good for Cabernet too.

You can get more value out of the region.


I like Heartland - luvverly. The Wine Society imports some nice stuff too.
 
I didn't really know. I've liked all the glaetzer label stuff I've tried - the Amon-ra one was awesome. Never come across the other stuff but I'll deffo get on the case.

Amon-Ra- which is the Shiraz his top wine. Then there's Annaperena - which is the Shiraz/cab blend - and fir my money sometimes better.

Hi more entry level is the Bishop, which is a Shiraz and the Wallace, which is a Shiraz Grenache.
 
That's not how it works though. Rodgers isn't banging young birds because he's got his teeth done, it's coz he manages us.


I'd have thought it's more down to him earning about 3million quid a year than managing us. Women couldn't give a flying fuck who he manages when he's earning that wedge. 'yeah liverchester utd, awesome. We still going to Tiffany's this afternoon?'
 
So that condones what he did?

And he has not behaved "better than most people." Don't be ridiculous.

Well we know Jack shit about it, his wife could be a bitch, he could have been in a marriage where it was already agreed between both partners that it was at it's end, whatever the semantics of it, there's alot of posters taking a convenient stance over this when they know fuck all.

Amazing that most of you are old enough and long in the tooth enough to know that relationships are a two way street and slightly more complicated than who fucked who over first, but if it fits the agenda.
 
It's the idea they made the fortune together that gets me. So the raising of children and bringing in millions as a PL manager is an equal contribution?

It's a laughable interpretation. Anyone can see it.

And how the fuck do you know it wasn't her family money that bought those houses! Some people are still living in the middle ages as far as relationships are concerned
 
She should be compensated for raising the kids, loss of earnings, loss of career.

What that adds up to, fine.

I don't see, and nobody has yet put forward an argument for, why she should be actively rewarded because Rodgers' has done spectacularly well in his career.


They were indeed a family but that is not a monetary unit and is its own reward: it's her right to withdraw that gift from Rodgers and that should be his punishment.

Deary me Peter. What a fucking trainwreck you've made in here.

You do also now that if he has to impart with some cash that it wouldn't all go towards her getting her eyebrows plucked don't you? Her lawyers would rightly argue that it's there to support their children that she will have predominant custody of.


And how do you know she wouldn't have done spectacularly well in her career if she wasn't raising his 3 kids?

Would Rodgers have "done spectacularly well in his career" if she hadn't have been there to manage their family for the last 20 years? Unlikely, because he'd have had to do more than put names in fucking envelopes and shag the travel coordinator Peter.
 
Deary me Peter. What a fucking trainwreck you've made in here.

You do also now that if he has to impart with some cash that it wouldn't all go towards her getting her eyebrows plucked don't you? Her lawyers would rightly argue that it's there to support their children that she will have predominant custody of.


And how do you know she wouldn't have done spectacularly well in her career if she wasn't raising his 3 kids?

Would Rodgers have "done spectacularly well in his career" if she hadn't have been there to manage their family for the last 20 years? Unlikely, because he'd have had to do more than put names in fucking envelopes and shag the travel coordinator Peter.



As I've explained to countless dimwits before you, Ryan, exactly how well he's done in his career has had fuck all to do with her role in the marriage. That he's had a career at all is of course partly down to her, and she should be compensated accordingly. Hence, a flat sum, not a percentage.

The matter of whether she'd have done spectacularly well in her career should be, I'd have thought, for her to make a case for. But I'm talking in general terms, here.

The maintenance of the children is obviously a legitimate part of the calculation. That being so obviously uncontentious that nobody has bothered to even raise it until now. Ryan.
 
I'm glad we're all privy to the marriage set up of the Rodgers' over the last 20 years and their respective roles, anyway.
 
As I've explained to countless dimwits before you, Ryan, exactly how well he's done in his career has had fuck all to do with her role in the marriage. That he's had a career at all is of course partly down to her, and she should be compensated accordingly. Hence, a flat sum, not a percentage.

The matter of whether she'd have done spectacularly well in her career should be, I'd have thought, for her to make a case for. But I'm talking in general terms, here.

The maintenance of the children is obviously a legitimate part of the calculation. That being so obviously uncontentious that nobody has bothered to even raise it until now. Ryan.


Why are you italicising my name Peter?
 
I'm glad we're all privy to the marriage set up of the Rodgers' over the last 20 years and their respective roles, anyway.


Just like you're privvy to how every future signing is going to work out absolutely peachy before they've even kicked a ball eh?
 
As I've explained to countless dimwits before you, Ryan, exactly how well he's done in his career has had fuck all to do with her role in the marriage.


Thankfully, the general public and the court that oversee's this case disagree with you here.
 
Just returning with interest.

The way you were referring to me as 'Peter' is clearly meant to be patronising and withering. I dislike it.


It wasn't. I'm not really bothered if you believe me or not, but I'm telling you it wasn't.

Regardless, you seem very touchy. Is it because everyone is telling you you're wrong.
 
Fine, your intention wasn't, but the effect is. The effect always is in such contexts. Make a note of it.

If half the people on here think I'm wrong, I might pause to wonder if I'm wrong.

If all of them think I'm wrong I'm certain I'm right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom