• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Other CL Quarters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if it brushed his arm ever so slightly, then onto his hip, not intentional is it?

What’s he supposed to do, cut his fucking arms off? They were right by his side!

I used to do that to my subbuteo players btw.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Even if it brushed his arm ever so slightly, then onto his hip, not intentional is it?

What’s he supposed to do, cut his fucking arms off? They were right by his side!

I used to do that to my subbuteo players btw.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ha me too.
 
After that moment, they were never the same again. It was like Spurs had broken their hearts into a million pieces. They didn't win another game for the next six years.
 
Someone on the radio backed up my point about the last goal being allowed to stand. I think it should stand. Eriksen tries to play the ball backwards, it takes a deflection off a City player and goes through to Aguero. It wasn't a pass by a City player playing it through to Aguero. I don't give a fuck like, but I think it should stand. Fucking hilarious that it never, mind.
 
Someone on the radio backed up my point about the last goal being allowed to stand. I think it should stand. Eriksen tries to play the ball backwards, it takes a deflection off a City player and goes through to Aguero. It wasn't a pass by a City player playing it through to Aguero. I don't give a fuck like, but I think it should stand. Fucking hilarious that it never, mind.


Nah, it's the other way around.

Had Bernardo passed the ball through and Eriksen made a play for it, and it deflected to Aguero, he'd be onside.

But Eriksen passed the ball, and Bernardo deflected it to a teammate in an offside position. That's black and white. There's no fancy rule around that.
 
Someone on the radio backed up my point about the last goal being allowed to stand. I think it should stand. Eriksen tries to play the ball backwards, it takes a deflection off a City player and goes through to Aguero. It wasn't a pass by a City player playing it through to Aguero. I don't give a fuck like, but I think it should stand. Fucking hilarious that it never, mind.

The deflection creates a new situation, so its offside. Its textbook and the correct decision.
 
This is brutal from the Guardian.

[article]Kompany was not directly responsible for Tottenham’s goals. Aymeric Laporte, who looked a little spooked, made one fateful error. But Kompany noticeably immobile at this level these days, a single huge stone Easter Island head stumbling around on legs that have all the snap and spring of a pair of bamboo garden poles.[/article]
 
I reckon Pep throws out a different team on Sat. Jesus, Sane & Mahrez. Could go either way - spurs could fold and lose 8-0 or could swag in and turn them over.
 
Are we really discussing that weak ass handball claim?
It barely grazed his arm before hitting his hip. Also his fucking arm was against his body, I mean what's the big deal here?
 
He's also said that United should rest players against them next week.

That's not because he's a brilliant football tactician ( as his managerial career clearly demonstrates), it's because he's a cunt

Yeah, I saw it. He's a massive cunt.
 
It would have gone in off his stomach then. He’s not some fat bastard.

It was always going in pussycannibas
Last time I checked, there's nothing in the rules against controlling/directing the ball with his stomach, as opposed to an arm/hand.

That's the issue, cockwomble.
 
To me it looked like the City defender throws his arm in and touch the ball as well.. not sure if it is natural position for that arm.
 
Someone on the radio backed up my point about the last goal being allowed to stand. I think it should stand. Eriksen tries to play the ball backwards, it takes a deflection off a City player and goes through to Aguero. It wasn't a pass by a City player playing it through to Aguero. I don't give a fuck like, but I think it should stand. Fucking hilarious that it never, mind.

The City player moved his foot, so even though he didn't control it he made an attempt to play the ball. It was the correct decision. Even the prick Guardiola agreed with it. It was It was offside for the same reason that Sane's goal against us last season should have been onside when the ball came off Milner. It's hilarious how lack of VAR cost them last year and VAR cost them this year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom