Sure.
The hypothesis is largely based on the conversations centring around the England team at the time of the world cup and just afterwards. The conversation - played out on TV and in the leading articles in most newspapers - was basicallyaroundabout where Wayne Rooney should play and who should be the captain. Immediately afterwards, the majority of the stories were about who should be the next captain. Essentially the main decision Roy Hodgson had to make - before he'd even picked a squad, before he'd decided what system he wanted to play and who would best fit that system, was to make a totemic, ultimately irrelevant decision because that's what he was being asked to do by the media.
He didn't turn around and say you've got this arse about tit, he just went along with it, as he always does, as managers did before him, with their instance on referring to players by their nicknames. We've built up a senseless, self-defeating culture of celebrity around footballers in this country - largely started by Sky Sports - that has meant the media and the viewers pandering to them. Witness the whole debate about where Gerrard should play back when Benitez played him off the right.
The conversation that plays out on TV is very little about football and mostly about celebrity, because like most other 'cultural' aspects of society, it's governed by fear. Fear that people who watch are stupid and, as you posit, just want to laugh at Robbie Savage.
If that's true, that people don't want the intelligent dialogue, then how come so many people listen to the 'niche' views of The Football Weekly podcast, or The Football Ramble? Explain away the success of those podcasts, staffed entirely by people with thoughtful discourse and lack of celebrity.
With have a large proportion of the media whose existence is reliant on football. That media then generate a huge amount of noise, and what the FA regard as public opinion. That noise then has a negative effect on the decisions the FA make and the decision the England manager makes. That's my assertion. I've no evidence for it, but I at least have an argument.
Talking around something means talking about anything but the subject. Why does this weasel language creep into everything, even bloody forums on the interweb?