I had similar thoughts.Shame it couldn’t have happened September 2nd after City spent £90m on him
I'm sure the FAs hand was turned when the move was close.. so not to allow for any litigation against themselves from City.
I had similar thoughts.Shame it couldn’t have happened September 2nd after City spent £90m on him
I had similar thoughts.
I'm sure the FAs hand was turned when the move was close.. so not to allow for any litigation against themselves from City.
Otavio at Porto. We were linked to him for a brief while last season or maybe season before. Ridiculous fee to pay for him.Who?
So basically a loan with no fee which will become a free transfer in summer? What the bloody hells the point in that? “Free puchase option” wtf.
Michael Essien is a part of the setup in Nordsjælland actually but the club you are referring to is FC Midtjylland (Jutland). I understand the mix-up 😀Isn't that the club that's provided the Danish connection which has helped Brentford so much? Maybe we could try poaching some of their backroom staff.
Why don’t clubs charge a billion quadrillion pounds when doing business with City? 65 million seems quite reasonable in this market for an attacker like Doku.
Michael Essien is a part of the setup in Nordsjælland actually but the club you are referring to is FC Midtjylland (Jutland). I understand the mix-up 😀
@Holle was right to have his card markedLol, Mané working against us
Damm it's only 20% of the profitCHA-CHING ...if Bournemouth sell Solanke for 40 mil we might get as much as 8 mil of the transfe fee.