How did the Steelers do? Any insight welcome.
Walter Football write up:
[article]
Pittsburgh Steelers: C+ Grade
Goals Entering the 2016 NFL Draft: The Steelers appear to have the fire power on offense to make a Super Bowl run. The problem has been their defense, particularly their secondary. The cornerback and safety spots must be shored up early in the 2016 NFL Draft. Pittsburgh also needs a couple of upgrades in the trenches, and a new backup quarterback wouldn't hurt either.
2016 NFL Draft Accomplishments: The Steelers often are able to obtain a top-ranked prospect who somehow falls to them late in the first round. Jarvis Jones, David DeCastro and Alvin Dupree all qualify as examples. That, however, did not happen this year, and Pittsburgh didn't have a great option as usual. As a result, the team reached on the raw Artie Burns. The Miami product could fill a need if he develops, but there's still a lot of work left to do with him. That's not ideal for a first-round pick.
It got better for the Steelers after that, but only by default. Sean Davis was a fine pick in the second round, as he'll further bolster Pittsburgh's horrible secondary. Fourth-rounder Jerald Hawkins has some upside and could eventually start at left tackle. However, Javon Hargrave, taken in the third frame, was a confusing selection in terms of his fit into a 3-4 scheme.
Excluding seventh-rounder Tyler Matakevich, who actually might have been the steal of the entire draft, the Steelers didn't score higher than a B+ with any of their picks. Only two choices were worse than a "B," but one of those happens to be the No. 1 selection, so that carries extra weight.
The Steelers deserve an underwhelming C+. This certainly wasn't a horrible haul, but they could've done much better with their 2016 class. [/article]
Bottom line is though - with your team, you guys normally draft players who contribute regardless of what 'the geniuses' say ... So you'll be fine.