[quote author=LeTallecWiz link=topic=32593.msg915473#msg915473 date=1248989369]
[quote author=Whaddapie link=topic=32593.msg915459#msg915459 date=1248988548]
[quote author=LeTallecWiz link=topic=32593.msg915332#msg915332 date=1248977444]
The curse of the babe ... Only 'Roids could help it be broken
[/quote]
Oh, do sod off, FFS!
'Cos only the Red Sox players were on steroid that season, right? None of the Angels, yankees or Cardinals were..? Bollocks.
I don't doubt for a second that we are / were as dirty as any other team, but that's all... AS dirty, no worse, no better.
During the steroid era, it's probably easier to count those who were not on the juice - The playing field was probably extremely level in that regard.
[/quote]
Considering how critical Ortiz was to that famous run in '03, it's tainted it in everyone's eyes (just like the 'other' stories that came out, be it Bonds or A-Rod).
I'm not sure 'when' this era started, but going by Canseco's claim (80%, but he's now amended it to 90%+), this era should just be forgotten about bar the players that were clean - Maddux, Glavine, Ripkin etc ... It's sad that such a great sport has been stained so badly in the last 20 odd years ...
[/quote]
Bollocks again, Avy.
It may be tainted in your eyes becuase you don't like Ortiz / the Red Sox, but when we've reached the point when it's universally accepted that approx 90% of the players on EVERY team were juicing, it doesn't taint anything, any more than any other WS Champion, with their own squads, 90% of which were also juicers.
I'm not defending the cheats here - I wish we were clean. But if EVERYBODY'S doing it, how can any one team be less deserving of winning that all the other teams? The opponents of the Sox in 2004 were all juicing too, y'know...
And truth be told, we don't know for certain who was clean, do we? In my mind, there are those who are caught, and those who aren't. Not being caught doesn't mean "innocent".