Whilst I do think Higuan is overrated, I'd hardly be upset if we signed him! We won't though 🙁
God you lot are thick sometimes.
The Bendtner question I raised was meant as a cheeky back-up signing on a FREE whilst Higuain would cost +20M.
The Argie is easily the better player of the two without doubt, although a different type, but that doesn't mean one rules our the other, simpletons.
When we are to splash the cash then you'd better get hold of a player that actually takes you a giant leap forward otherwise we'll keep ending up with the likes of Carroll, Downing etc. who's good but perhaps not quite what we were looking for, especially not with their prize in mind.
Sanchez would give us cover all over the front line, he's fast, quick and perfectly suited for Rodgers style. Higuain, despite being a good striker, not a world class one mind, doesn't. He'd play much the same spot as Sturridge or compete with whomever being brought in to fill the no. 10 spot. And that, imo, would be a waste of a lot money as he's not going to improve us remarkably. Actually I wouldn't swap him with Sturridge at all. Would you?
Not that he isn't good but we could find players more suited, is this to hard to understand?
@Oncy you really have to learn not become a complete prick every time someone dares to be of a different opinion of you. Especially as you are shifting opinions as we other changes clothes, hence, you very often act the prick on here.
Oncy doesn't mind differing opinions, he just despises people who have a touch of arrogance that their opinion is right.
Opinions cannot be right.
Unless they're mine.
God you lot are thick sometimes.
The Bendtner question I raised was meant as a cheeky back-up signing on a FREE whilst Higuain would cost +20M.
The Argie is easily the better player of the two without doubt, although a different type, but that doesn't mean one rules our the other, simpletons.
When we are to splash the cash then you'd better get hold of a player that actually takes you a giant leap forward otherwise we'll keep ending up with the likes of Carroll, Downing etc. who's good but perhaps not quite what we were looking for, especially not with their prize in mind.
Sanchez would give us cover all over the front line, he's fast, quick and perfectly suited for Rodgers style. Higuain, despite being a good striker, not a world class one mind, doesn't. He'd play much the same spot as Sturridge or compete with whomever being brought in to fill the no. 10 spot. And that, imo, would be a waste of a lot money as he's not going to improve us remarkably. Actually I wouldn't swap him with Sturridge at all. Would you?
And bendtner wouldn't be good for us even if he paid us money
God you lot are thick sometimes.
The Bendtner question I raised was meant as a cheeky back-up signing on a FREE whilst Higuain would cost +20M.
The Argie is easily the better player of the two without doubt, although a different type, but that doesn't mean one rules our the other, simpletons.
When we are to splash the cash then you'd better get hold of a player that actually takes you a giant leap forward otherwise we'll keep ending up with the likes of Carroll, Downing etc. who's good but perhaps not quite what we were looking for, especially not with their prize in mind.
Sanchez would give us cover all over the front line, he's fast, quick and perfectly suited for Rodgers style. Higuain, despite being a good striker, not a world class one mind, doesn't. He'd play much the same spot as Sturridge or compete with whomever being brought in to fill the no. 10 spot. And that, imo, would be a waste of a lot money as he's not going to improve us remarkably. Actually I wouldn't swap him with Sturridge at all. Would you?
Not that he isn't good but we could find players more suited, is this to hard to understand?
@Oncy you really have to learn not to become a complete prick every time someone dares to be of a different opinion of you. Especially as you are shifting opinions as we other changes clothes, hence, you very often act the prick on here.
A few points Mr. K --
1) He wouldn't cost us money - it would be x0 million + p/e ... So he wouldn't cost ... That being said, 20 million on him if we're losing Suarez is a very good deal. He is a fantastic striker
2) I don't get why you don't think Higuain can play on either side of the front '3' in the 4-3-3. Sanchez is a striker, like Higuain, who prefers to play up front (as he did with Udinese) and as he did plenty of times with Barca. However, he's utilized on the 'wing' (the front 3) ... Higuain can do the same thing ... and like Sanchez, has the fitness and physical strength to play ROdgers' pressing system (when needed).
He's better than Sturridge ... and doesn't get injured.
You're underestimate how good Higuain is ... and he'll be cheaper than Sanchez most likely ...
I may do that. I may underestimate him and he might prove to be a world class player for us.
He'd cost exactly as much money as we'd agree to lower our asking prize with on Suarez.
Higuain, whenever I've seen him on the wing, has looked much less industrious when in central and no, I wouldn't swap him with Sturridge, whom I believe has got more flair, better technique and quicker feets than Higuain.
From the times I've watched Sanchez with Chile and Udine he's looked his sharpest when utilized on the wing. He's by no means a stationary player and he'd roam over most of the pitch but I believe Coutinho has got some of the same traits why they'd be lovely to have in the same team. Higuain is by no means as adaptable and mobile as Sanchez, imo, but far more of an out and out striker.
He may be slightly cheaper than Sanhez, but imo, for a good reason, and even more so when looking at the team we are trying to build.
If Bendtner wasn't Danish you wouldn't give a fuck about him, we've been here and done this. You're dismissing one player who's record (despite being on the fringe of things) is quite brilliant, while advocating the purchase of a player who's roundly recognised not only as an utter cunt, but a bit shit too.
As someone said earlier, you know your football Kris and I always value your posts regarding players, particularly up and coming ones, but you've got a massive bias blind spot when it comes to your own.
Oncy doesn't mind differing opinions, he just despises people who have a touch of arrogance that their opinion is right.
Opinions cannot be right.
Unless they're mine.
Did you miss the spot where I said Higuain was easily the better player?
Anyways you are right with regards to Bendtner that I have followed him closer because he is Danish. It also makes me think, deluded as I am perhaps, that I pretty much know his strengths and weaknesses, why I sometimes have been of the opinion that he could be a clever signing for us.
I MAY HAVE GOT THAT ONE WRONG.
Ok?
Another question, I am the only person who thinks Benteke is hugely overrated and would be a big fat waste of money at £20million?
Another question, I am the only person who thinks Benteke is hugely overrated and would be a big fat waste of money at £20million?
Can't we have both?!
Although tempting, I doubt it.
Oncy doesn't mind differing opinions, he just despises people who have a touch of arrogance that their opinion is right.
Opinions cannot be right.
Unless they're mine.
Opinions can't be right or wrong.I keep reading this on here and elsewhere on the net, and - sorry - it's bollocks. Of course opinions can be right or wrong - it's the function of debate to point out why. The fact that everybody's entitled to them doesn't mean they're all equally justified.