But Suarez hasn't been our spearhead, that's been sturridge. We need someone to play off the striker to shift downing.
I'd be tempted to pilfer the likes of contrao, or (in a sexy, unrealistic world) khedira to oust Lucas
Mourinho said he was lazy apparently - I think someone posted that the other day.
I thought he'd really come of age before Benzema had arrived but not quite sure where he is at these days because I don't watch much of Madrid any more.
I kinda agree with Modo though - signing a striker like Higuain would leave us with two #9s and its not really a luxury we can afford. Neither would want to sit on the bench and one would suffer if played out wide.
That's fair, but Jovetic looks on his way to City now. Muriel is probably worth a try, but you have to keep in mind that he is still a very raw product.
I have no idea how Higuain is lazy though, and he had the best shots/goal ratio of the top 14 scorers in La Liga last season.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
The idea is to find attacking players who are versatile.
But like I've said before, I really don't think we need another striker. Sturridge, Aspas, Borini will do when were only competing in three competitions. I don't think we'll ever see all three of them on the pitch at the same time. Sure their injury record is a bit worrying but I'd rather we focus on getting another attacking mid who can compete with Coutinho and Alberto.
Pretty much and I don't like the guy. Lazy and misses tons of chances.
Anyway I want us to sign strikers like Jovetic or Muriel, who can play in several positions.
I don't know if he's lazy but I do know he needs half as many shots as Suarez before he scores a goal.
He scored a goal once every 3.5 shots last season. You won't get much more clinical than that
Yes but if wasting chances is one of your key indicators, then you're using it against the wrong player.
And is your argument that we need a Suarez style player to replace him ?
You don't need to shoot to waste a chance either, you can lose the ball, mis-control a ball etc. Hence why I don't focus on stats.
I just haven't been that impressed when I've seen him play.
Okay
Suarez turned the ball over more that twice as frequently per game than Higuain, and was dispossessed more than three times more frequently.
Suarez did attempt significantly more dribbles/long passes/key passes, but both players had a similar pass completion %. Suarez is obviously the better creator, but a lot of his success comes from volume.
I don't know if he's lazy but I do know he needs half as many shots as Suarez before he scores a goal.
He scored a goal once every 3.5 shots last season. You won't get much more clinical than that
This 'shots to goals' ratio has been brought up quite a few times recently - particularly in relation to Suarez - and I wonder is it now considered a genuine barometer of a strikers efficiency?
For me it lacks context. It doesn't tell you about the kind of team the player plays in, the chances they create, the quality of the chances, the level of involvement of the player in question or any of the other variables.
It can provide you some indication that the player isn't wasteful with the chances that are presented to him and that's good to know but can it really be used as a basis for comparison between two players in very different environments...
It's amazing that some people seem surprised by this behaviour. Was anyone genuinely expecting loyalty from him? A few of us suggested before that he was, y'know, a bit of a cunt, and some people went out of their way to excuse him. Hardly surprising that he followed up on his previous cuntish behaviour with some more cuntish behaviour, and is now acting like an ubercunt.
I wanted him sold after he decided to bite another player whilst wearing a Liverpool shirt. He seems to think that the English media misunderstood his actions (presumably it was an affectionate bite), but I thought he was a massive cunt. None of this surprises me. None of it.
This 'shots to goals' ratio has been brought up quite a few times recently - particularly in relation to Suarez - and I wonder is it now considered a genuine barometer of a strikers efficiency?
For me it lacks context. It doesn't tell you about the kind of team the player plays in, the chances they create, the quality of the chances, the level of involvement of the player in question or any of the other variables.
It can provide you some indication that the player isn't wasteful with the chances that are presented to him and that's good to know but can it really be used as a basis for comparison between two players in very different environments...
It's not good, but then someone like Higuain will have 7 of those 8 shots created by his teammates at Madrid. With Suarez, 6 out of the 8 might be created by him all on his own, when our team might be looking clueless in the final third, which was often the case.No matter how you look at it though, Suarez's ratio is terrible. More than 8 shots per goal is a little terrifying...
It's not good, but then someone like Higuain will have 7 of those 8 shots created by his teammates at Madrid. With Suarez, 6 out of the 8 might be created by him all on his own, when our team might be looking clueless in the final third, which was often the case.
You have to accept the good with the bad and there's no doubt the cunt's presence was vital for us not dropping further down the table last season.
The argument makes sense to some extent, but you have to take into account that
But yeah, Higuain does get better opportunities in the final third. I'm struggling to find another top class striker in a major league who has a conversion rate worse than Suarez though.
- Those numbers(6 of 8, 7 of 8) are inflated to fit your argument. While historically he has had to create a lot of his own shots for us, Suarez was played into dangerous areas with higher frequency this season. He's still one of the best in the world at setting himself up to shoot, but the quality and quantity of opportunities presented was much higher this season.
- There is a certain tactical quality in strikers to get into dangerous areas. While Higuain isn't exclusively a poacher, smart movement is a big part of his game. For every tap in he's put in, we can probably think of a number times when a chance has been missed because we were lacking that presence over the last few seasons.
Tevez was quite poor, but he may not be in that same category anymore.
I think your point 2 is where Sturridge comes in, and I think it will be a bit of a waste of investment if Higuain was brought in (on HUGE wages) and Sturridge ends up playing second fiddle or put out wide. His best performances last season came from him playing down the middle to lead the attack. Yes, he drifts out wide but that's an advantage for a player in the middle (like Henry) because you get to drift to the wing that you choose, i.e. with less players to deal with, and you're still going right back in to the middle the moment wide attackers start dealing with the ball in the final third.
I think getting a few million and Higuain for Suarez is a bad deal for us. We need to tell Real to fuck right off if that's what they're offering. And you can also be sure they'll be certain they're getting the better deal out of it.
- Key passes: The final pass or pass-cum-shot leading to the recipient of the ball having an attempt at goal without scoring
- Chances: Assists plus Key passes
- Take-ons: This is an attempt by a player to beat an opponent in possession of the ball. A successful dribble means the player beats the defender while retaining possession, unsuccessful ones are where the dribbler is tackled, Opta also log attempted dribbles where the player overruns the ball and thus concedes possession
Suarez’s numbers too back up the fact that he’s one of the best players playing in the EPL, but with certain caveats. The highest amount of Goals scored per game (Gpg) as well as attempting and completing the highest amount of passes among the all the striker listed here. But things are never straight forward wherever suarez is involved. His conversion rate is appalling. Attempted a massive 143 shots over the course of the season but “only” 23 were goals – An appalling conversion rate of just 16%. Now 16% in itself isn’t exceptionally bad, but when seen with the sheer volume of chances it is super bad. He also created 89 chances for his team mates but “only” .05% (yes “0.05%“) of them lead to goals – ridiculously low figure! He is notorious for giving the ball away and this is highlighted by the number of take ons attempted and failed. Attempted 255 take ons. Yes, 255!!! and failed with 160 of them(all other strikers put together could muster only 187, Suarez alone gave the ball away 160 times). That is a ridiculously high number and sits well with his extremely inefficient but brilliant ways. So while he is capable of brilliance with the ball at his feet(creating 89 chances at a 2.54 chances per match-phenomenal for a striker, more akin to a Attack Mid), his capability of turning over possession to the opposition too is unmatched. The entire Liverpool team is geared around Suarez and this is one of the reasons why his shots attempted and take-ons are so high. No other striker in the list enjoys such luxury. Suarez is a delightful player to watch and extremely gifted but even when he’s not biting players or racially abusing them, he demands a lot of service to produce the goods. A brilliant player undoubtedly but a woeful finisher.
Both Lukaku and Higuain have an extremely good shot accuracy i.e the percentage of shots on target as opposed to the total shots attempted. But when it comes to down to the conversion rate Higuain leaves everybody behind with an eye popping 33.3% score. That is absolutely exceptional. Scoring 16 goals off barely 48 shots and not to mention racking up 5 assists from ‘just’ 17 chances created. Higuain is the perfect example of a player who plays to the percentages. The one criticism that can be leveled against him is that unlike others he is less involved. But the counter argument to that is that he demands and can thrive upon extremely low service unlike both Rvp and Suarez. However service should not be a problem as Arsenal have Cazorla. It would be interesting to see how Higuain shapes up after being out of the shadow of Ronaldo. It is no secret that CR7 is the fulcrum of every single attack of Madrid and others, including the CFs, are mere auxiliaries.