• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

LFC SOLD to NESV.

Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195610#msg1195610 date=1287058211]
I guess this comes from owning shares myself and what I've read on the echo. to be fair, have I actually been wrong about anything I've said on this thread?
[/quote]

Ahhhh The Liverpool Echo. The bible on corporate law and court process. 🙂

I'm with Neil everyone !
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Sunny link=topic=41783.msg1195615#msg1195615 date=1287058349]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195610#msg1195610 date=1287058211]
I guess this comes from owning shares myself and what I've read on the echo. to be fair, have I actually been wrong about anything I've said on this thread?
[/quote]

Ahhhh The Liverpool Echo. The bible on corporate law and court process. 🙂

I'm with Neil everyone !
[/quote]

git! 😉
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195610#msg1195610 date=1287058211]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41783.msg1195605#msg1195605 date=1287058106]
Spidey... this is probably a bit of a rhetorical question, but do you actually know what you're talking about?
[/quote]

I guess this comes from owning shares myself and what I've read on the echo. to be fair, have I actually been wrong about anything I've said on this thread?
[/quote]How can you be wrong by just CONSTANTLY quoting other people and saying 'Uh Oh' and 'Can this be right?' and 'This looks like bad news'

Youve been a fucking whopper in this thread Neil. a WHOPPER.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195617#msg1195617 date=1287058401]
git! 😉
[/quote]

Only ribbing you mate. I'm as confused by all this as the next man.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195610#msg1195610 date=1287058211]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41783.msg1195605#msg1195605 date=1287058106]
Spidey... this is probably a bit of a rhetorical question, but do you actually know what you're talking about?
[/quote]

I guess this comes from owning shares myself and what I've read on the echo. to be fair, have I actually been wrong about anything I've said on this thread?
[/quote]

Apart from insisting right up until yesterday that Hicks was going to pull a rabbit out of the hat at the last minute, no.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=41783.msg1195618#msg1195618 date=1287058460]

Youve been a fucking whopper in this thread Neil. a WHOPPER.
[/quote]

whopper.jpg
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=ILD link=topic=41783.msg1195607#msg1195607 date=1287058187]
KEEP THE FAITH
[/quote]

Right, I'm downgrading my 'level of panic Mr Man' avatar from Grumpy to Topsy Turvy.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=41783.msg1195618#msg1195618 date=1287058460]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195610#msg1195610 date=1287058211]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41783.msg1195605#msg1195605 date=1287058106]
Spidey... this is probably a bit of a rhetorical question, but do you actually know what you're talking about?
[/quote]

I guess this comes from owning shares myself and what I've read on the echo. to be fair, have I actually been wrong about anything I've said on this thread?
[/quote]How can you be wrong by just CONSTANTLY quoting other people and saying 'Uh Oh' and 'Can this be right?' and 'This looks like bad news'

Youve been a fucking whopper in this thread Neil. a WHOPPER.
[/quote]

can't help it, I'm scared, oncy. hold me... :'(
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=IanTheRed link=topic=41783.msg1195622#msg1195622 date=1287058535]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=41783.msg1195607#msg1195607 date=1287058187]
KEEP THE FAITH
[/quote]

Right, I'm downgrading my 'level of panic Mr Man' avatar from Grumpy to Topsy Turvy.
[/quote]HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Best post in the entire thread.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195624#msg1195624 date=1287058558]
[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=41783.msg1195618#msg1195618 date=1287058460]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195610#msg1195610 date=1287058211]
[quote author=keniget link=topic=41783.msg1195605#msg1195605 date=1287058106]
Spidey... this is probably a bit of a rhetorical question, but do you actually know what you're talking about?
[/quote]

I guess this comes from owning shares myself and what I've read on the echo. to be fair, have I actually been wrong about anything I've said on this thread?
[/quote]How can you be wrong by just CONSTANTLY quoting other people and saying 'Uh Oh' and 'Can this be right?' and 'This looks like bad news'

Youve been a fucking whopper in this thread Neil. a WHOPPER.
[/quote]

can't help it, I'm scared, oncy. hold me... :'(
[/quote]Dont worry mate, we are all in this together. I just wish youd let the odd hopeful thought gain ground.
Its gonna be ok. Trust me im a dad, i deal with Owwies all the time.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195624#msg1195624 date=1287058558]
can't help it, I'm scared, oncy. hold me... :'(
[/quote]

Heh, chasing your own tail in this thread isn't really going to help matters.

Wait for the news to filter out properly instead of constantly jumping to your own conclusions after every posted tweet.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=IanTheRed link=topic=41783.msg1195622#msg1195622 date=1287058535]
[quote author=ILD link=topic=41783.msg1195607#msg1195607 date=1287058187]
KEEP THE FAITH
[/quote]

Right, I'm downgrading my 'level of panic Mr Man' avatar from Grumpy to Topsy Turvy.
[/quote]

I'm shifting mine to Mr Hicks Greedy
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

Like Avmenon has said, the crux of the issue boils down to whether there is a legally binding agreement between NESV and the Board.

If Mills Financial are hedge fund investors, I doubt it'd be foolish enough to throw money at Hicks on the back of yesterday's High Court ruling, without that issue being resolved.

Because, IF they have bought Hicks out and IF the NESV sale agreement is subsequently ratified, then it would have only thrown millions at Hicks with no football club to show for. Given that Hicks is a bankrupt and the queue of his creditors is likely to stretch across the country, Mills prospects of recovering their investment in full would also be bleak. I can't see them exposing themselves to this kind of risk.

Of course, if they had taken over Hick's shares at a low low price then it may just be plausible... but the Fat Texan is a greedy twat, so I doubt it.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Sunny link=topic=41783.msg1195619#msg1195619 date=1287058468]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195617#msg1195617 date=1287058401]
git! 😉
[/quote]

Only ribbing you mate. I'm as confused by all this as the next man.
[/quote]

And Anita
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=41783.msg1195631#msg1195631 date=1287058837]
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=41783.msg1195619#msg1195619 date=1287058468]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195617#msg1195617 date=1287058401]
git! 😉
[/quote]

Only ribbing you mate. I'm as confused by all this as the next man.
[/quote]

And Anita
[/quote]

unless she's lying 😉
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=41783.msg1195630#msg1195630 date=1287058765]
Like Avmenon has said, the crux of the issue boils down to whether there is a legally binding agreement between NESV and the Board.

If Mills Financial are hedge fund investors, I doubt it'd be foolish enough to throw money at Hicks on the back of yesterday's High Court ruling, without that issue being resolved.

Because, IF they have bought Hicks out and IF the NESV sale agreement is subsequently ratified, then it would have only thrown millions at Hicks with no football club to show for. Given that Hicks is a bankrupt and the queue of his creditors is likely to stretch across the country, Mills prospects of recovering their investment in full would also be bleak. I can't see them exposing themselves to this kind of risk.

Of course, if they had taken over Hick's shares at a low low price then it may just be plausible... but the Fat Texan is a greedy twat, so I doubt it.
[/quote]

You've made some very good posts in this thread rushie
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=keniget link=topic=41783.msg1195628#msg1195628 date=1287058681]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195624#msg1195624 date=1287058558]
can't help it, I'm scared, oncy. hold me... :'(
[/quote]

Heh, chasing your own tail in this thread isn't really going to help matters.

Wait for the news to filter out properly instead of constantly jumping to your own conclusions after every posted tweet.
[/quote]Innit.

Niel is like that guy from the fast show being led by everyone in the pub.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

I just spent 25 minutes reading 30+ pages and nothing has happened?!

Argh!
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=41783.msg1195630#msg1195630 date=1287058765]
Like Avmenon has said, the crux of the issue boils down to whether there is a legally binding agreement between NESV and the Board.

If Mills Financial are hedge fund investors, I doubt it'd be foolish enough to throw money at Hicks on the back of yesterday's High Court ruling, without that issue being resolved.

Because, IF they have bought Hicks out and IF the NESV sale agreement is subsequently ratified, then it would have only thrown millions at Hicks with no football club to show for. Given that Hicks is a bankrupt and the queue of his creditors is likely to stretch across the country, Mills prospects of recovering their investment in full would also be bleak. I can't see them exposing themselves to this kind of risk.

Of course, if they had taken over Hick's shares at a low low price then it may just be plausible... but the Fat Texan is a greedy twat, so I doubt it.
[/quote]

That's been key all along, and the answer to the persistent worries of a few on here about Hicks refinancing. Even high-risk investors like these people do actually want their money back, preferably before the next Ice Age.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=41783.msg1195636#msg1195636 date=1287059011]
I just spent 25 minutes reading 30+ pages and nothing has happened?!

Argh!
[/quote]

you need to change your avatar to champagne on ice 😉
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=41783.msg1195637#msg1195637 date=1287059051]
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=41783.msg1195630#msg1195630 date=1287058765]
Like Avmenon has said, the crux of the issue boils down to whether there is a legally binding agreement between NESV and the Board.

If Mills Financial are hedge fund investors, I doubt it'd be foolish enough to throw money at Hicks on the back of yesterday's High Court ruling, without that issue being resolved.

Because, IF they have bought Hicks out and IF the NESV sale agreement is subsequently ratified, then it would have only thrown millions at Hicks with no football club to show for. Given that Hicks is a bankrupt and the queue of his creditors is likely to stretch across the country, Mills prospects of recovering their investment in full would also be bleak. I can't see them exposing themselves to this kind of risk.

Of course, if they had taken over Hick's shares at a low low price then it may just be plausible... but the Fat Texan is a greedy twat, so I doubt it.
[/quote]

That's been key all along, and the answer to the persistent worries of a few on here about Hicks refinancing. Even high-risk investors like these people do actually want their money back, preferably before the next Ice Age.
[/quote]

but there is also danger of mill wanting to cash in on a potential bidding war.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=Squiggles link=topic=41783.msg1195636#msg1195636 date=1287059011]
I just spent 25 minutes reading 30+ pages and nothing has happened?!

Argh!
[/quote]

You should quiff and work backwards
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

God i can not wait for all this to be sorted out its making my head hurt 😱
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

Tweet from khl@sweettweetweet tweet tweet spidey-tweet

Just in. Latest. Liverpool is going to be the bestest club in the world yet again. We'll all eat loads of Texan steaks and laugh and enjoy cheerful times. Agger's injured for Sunday.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

There's only one point in there that's a cert.

Agger's brokening.
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=KHL link=topic=41783.msg1195643#msg1195643 date=1287059326]
Tweet from khl@sweettweetweet tweet tweet spidey-tweet

Just in. Latest. Liverpool is going to be the bestest club in the world yet again. We'll all eat loads of Texan steaks and laugh and enjoy cheerful times. Agger's injured for Sunday.
[/quote]

to be fair agger being injuried is hardly news 😉
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195633#msg1195633 date=1287058864]
[quote author=Jack D Rips link=topic=41783.msg1195631#msg1195631 date=1287058837]
[quote author=Sunny link=topic=41783.msg1195619#msg1195619 date=1287058468]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195617#msg1195617 date=1287058401]
git! 😉
[/quote]

Only ribbing you mate. I'm as confused by all this as the next man.
[/quote]

And Anita
[/quote]

unless she's lying 😉
[/quote]

Whose Neets lying with? :-[
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

off to lunch. to anyone I've upset with my posts or qoutes I apologise 🙂
 
Re: LFC Sold to NESV (RBS WIN COURT RULING - CONFIRMED.........TBC

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=41783.msg1195640#msg1195640 date=1287059225]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=41783.msg1195637#msg1195637 date=1287059051]
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=41783.msg1195630#msg1195630 date=1287058765]
Like Avmenon has said, the crux of the issue boils down to whether there is a legally binding agreement between NESV and the Board.

If Mills Financial are hedge fund investors, I doubt it'd be foolish enough to throw money at Hicks on the back of yesterday's High Court ruling, without that issue being resolved.

Because, IF they have bought Hicks out and IF the NESV sale agreement is subsequently ratified, then it would have only thrown millions at Hicks with no football club to show for. Given that Hicks is a bankrupt and the queue of his creditors is likely to stretch across the country, Mills prospects of recovering their investment in full would also be bleak. I can't see them exposing themselves to this kind of risk.

Of course, if they had taken over Hick's shares at a low low price then it may just be plausible... but the Fat Texan is a greedy twat, so I doubt it.
[/quote]

That's been key all along, and the answer to the persistent worries of a few on here about Hicks refinancing. Even high-risk investors like these people do actually want their money back, preferably before the next Ice Age.
[/quote]

but there is also danger of mill wanting to cash in on a potential bidding war.
[/quote]

That's even more speculative than the idea of Hicks paying his debts.

I'll say one thing for you, neil - your ingenuity in dreaming up disaster scenarios is extraordinary.
 
Back
Top Bottom