He's a water carrier, he'll keep the ball moving and feel at ease in pretty, quick-passing triangles, he needs to seriously impose himself more and he needs to influence the games when we're pressed and he doesn't have as much time as he'd like (or when he doesn't have the ball). He's not Xavi, he's an ok player who might flourish in the right set up and when surrounded with quality.
To be "quality" he'd have to have an outstanding ability - he doesn't have goals in him, he's not physical or athletic, he doesn't have a killer pass or long-range ability, he's just a steady potential all rounder who needs to adapt his game and learn how to be effective without the ball. The Xavi comparisons are laughable, as are those writing him off and those bigging him up too much to save face over initial assessments. He's another in similar mould to Lucas and Henderson, a poor first season with minor hints of ability that might be worth being indulgent over, but ultimately right now has us feeling like we've been had again, big time.
He was a midfield ‘technician’ labelled the Welsh Xavi, he was a £15m signing named man of the match in his first three Premier League starts, and he was an international who appeared to be a potential successor to giants like Alonso and Mascherano.
Except he was also a player whose performance levels came down with the Christmas decorations.
The Welsh Xavi tag didn’t help.
Nor did some high profile criticism.
Alan Shearer, in a rare attempt to be as incisive on screen as he was as a striker, highlighted Allen’s preference for a safe sideways ball over a risky penetrating pass.
But was it as simple as all that?
Is Allen a modern day Butch Wilkins?
Did his stock fall simply because he stopped being ambitious with his passing?
Not according to the always illuminating EPL Index website.
A detailed analysis of Allen’s figures last season showed that he wasn’t backwards in coming forward (Steven Gerrard and Jordan Henderson actually passed the ball back more).
He wasn’t a crab either, preferring to pass the ball sideways.
Joe Allen actually passed the ball forwards more than Mikel Arteta (31% to 29%) and only fractionally less than Yaya Toure. And another Allen myth – that he can only pass the ball short, which in the hurly burly, impatient attacking style of the English Premier League is considered a sin – was spectacularly exploded.
Allen’s long pass success rate last season was the second best in the league at 89.66%.
So where did it all go wrong for Joe Allen? Because he was clearly no more a Welsh Xavi in the second half of last season than Robert Earnshaw was a David Villa of the Valleys.
From an early season average of nearly 93% passing accuracy, Allen’s average dropped to below 86% after the Goodison derby and never recovered. That coincided almost exactly with the shoulder injury which eventually ended his season prematurely – and the moment he was handed the added responsibility/distraction of becoming a father for the first time.
Despite the dip in his statistics after October, the only players to out-pass Allen across the season as a whole were Mikel Arteta and Moussa Dembele, while his Open Play Pass Completion (90%), Attacking Zone Pass Completion (85%) and Final Third Pass Completion (81%) were all well above the Premier League average (86.92%, 80.15% and 70.31% respectively).
But the best analysis of Allen’s performances last season came from the man who knew exactly what he was supposed to be doing out on the pitch.
After Shearer’s withering assessment in October when Allen was actually performing well, Brendan Rodgers rapped: “Unbelievable – so-called pundits who don’t know the dynamics of a team and how it functions.
“Joe’s role is to keep the ball. And that, in Britain, is a special talent. It is why Paul Scholes is still playing at his age. It is such a rare talent for a midfielder to rarely give the ball away.”
Allen, as his figures show, treats possession like it is nine tenths of the law.
And given a clean bill of health – and no continental imports like Nuri Sahin jostling for his midfield berth – Joe Allen can belatedly justify his £15m transfer fee.
Yeah, we all know what a big part in passing your shoulder plays.
Yeah, we all know what a big part in passing your shoulder plays.
Yeah I mean its only a shoulder - Only affects balance, running, tackling, strength, not to mention confidence...what a pussy eh....
And football is a game for pussies.
It's amazing it didn't affect Gerrard isn't it - who got better in the second half of the season while carrying the same injury.
And football is a game for pussies.
It's amazing it didn't affect Gerrard isn't it - who got better in the second half of the season while carrying the same injury.
And football is a game for pussies.
I'm not a medical person but:
Gerrard went for a keyhole surgey for his left shoulder that was described as a "minor procedure to cure a recurring pain" that would keep him "out of action for between six to eight weeks" whereas for Allen, "three years of wear and tear, the ball and socket of his shoulder have come apart and the recovery time for the extensive work he needs doing to the joint is between 10 and 12 weeks" and "the surgeon said that if you touched it with your thumb you would have broken the shoulder"
Didn't Allen really look the part for the first 7 or so games last season?
I doubt that Allen is for sale. That would be surprising. He isn't a great defensive midfielder or an attacking midfielder. As a holding midfielder he can be very good but hasn't shown that consistently at Liverpool yet.
But, how did our medical team miss a two year old shoulder injury when we splurged 15m on him, I mean they must do an extensive MRI scan at the medical? And surely Rodgers must have known about it.
I've had 2 different types of shoulder injury, one made me slightly pussier, the other made me a screaming weeping slightly dribbling pussy every time I bumped it. After
surgery on both I got back to being a normal pussy so I can sympathize a bit with Allen. But, how did our medical team miss a two year old shoulder injury when we splurged 15m on him, I mean they must do an extensive MRI scan at the medical? And surely Rodgers must have known about it.
The notion that Allen played for five months with a shoulder that was one touch away from falling apart is ridiculous. I think it's petty clear he damaged it in March to the extent he couldn't play on with it, which is fair enough.
Niggling shoulder injuries aren't a big deal in football - it's not, as the pleb in the Echo tries to say, the reason why his passing stats dropped!
Poor lad! Let me give you examples to help you. Defensive midfielder = Mascherano, Holding midfielder = AlonsoWhen i was a regular poster on this site, the terms "holding midfielder" and "defensive midfielder" used to mean one and the same...
I guess things have changed now....
I agree in principle, and his condition has been exaggerated for the newspaper, although an injury can reduce your concentration if your concerned about a 'Stoke-ladite' trying to crush you in order to win the ball, my point was he shouldn't have been bought if he a deteriorating two year shoulder condition, unprofessional of Rodgers who surely knew about it. It stinks a bit of Aqualani, and adds to my pet hate feeling that Managers should not be allowed to bring any of their former players with them. £15m is over a third of our annual gate receipts.The notion that Allen played for five months with a shoulder that was one touch away from falling apart is ridiculous. I think it's petty clear he damaged it in March to the extent he couldn't play on with it, which is fair enough.
Niggling shoulder injuries aren't a big deal in football - it's not, as the pleb in the Echo tries to say, the reason why his passing stats dropped!
Then why did his passing stats drop?
The opposition, his teammates, maybe he played more forward passes, more longer passes, more risky passes. Maybe he played further forward when Lucas returned. Regression to the mean.
It could be any or all of those reasons