Bid has been rejected according to the echo.
Hope Coutinho hands in a transfer request now like we hoped Keita would do.
A small dose of "what goes around, comes around" is good for us.
Edit. Too early...
You're an odd fucker, Modo.
Bid has been rejected according to the echo.
Hope Coutinho hands in a transfer request now like we hoped Keita would do.
A small dose of "what goes around, comes around" is good for us.
Edit. Too early...
Yeah, we have done it a few times.They'll do that thing where they say he can go next year if he shuts up and gets on with this season.
Bid has been rejected according to the echo.
Hope Coutinho hands in a transfer request now like we hoped Keita would do.
A small dose of "what goes around, comes around" is good for us.
Edit. Too early...
So all the times we've been fucked over in the past (mascherano going on strike to force a move etc), and now because we have done it its karma? That doesn't even make sense.Bid has been rejected according to the echo.
Hope Coutinho hands in a transfer request now like we hoped Keita would do.
A small dose of "what goes around, comes around" is good for us.
Edit. Too early...
We were almost punished for tapping up Van Dijk.So all the times we've been fucked over in the past (mascherano going on strike to force a move etc), and now because we have done it its karma? That doesn't even make sense.
Is bidding for a footballer tapping up these days?We were almost punished for tapping up Van Dijk.
We also tried to tap up a Stoke youth player.
Now we keep bidding on a player that clearly isn't for sale.
We were almost punished for tapping up Van Dijk.
We also tried to tap up a Stoke youth player.
Now we keep bidding on a player that clearly isn't for sale.
So I guess it's OK if we say no he's not for sale to Barca and few days later they come with another bid, then another, then another. For some reason I think the tactic is to try to unsettle the player. I don't believe that he's some sort of closet red but suddenly he's like "I dream of playing for Liverpool", fuck that.Is bidding for a footballer tapping up these days?
Points 1&2 is done by every club and has been going on for god knows how many years. Only difference is that we got caught.We were almost punished for tapping up Van Dijk.
We also tried to tap up a Stoke youth player.
Now we keep bidding on a player that clearly isn't for sale.
Now we keep bidding on a player that clearly isn't for sale.
Yes. That Is a valid tactic that every club does when bidding. No doesn't always mean no as we know. You surely know all this and are just pissing around.So I guess it's OK if we say no he's not for sale to Barca and few days later they come with another bid, then another, then another. For some reason I think the tactic is to try to unsettle the player. I don't believe that he's some sort of closet red but suddenly he's like "I dream of playing for Liverpool", fuck that.
You know when it's right? When the club like for instance Roma say, OK we don't really want to sell but we would accept a bid of 35 mill.Points 1&2 is done by every club and has been going on for god knows how many years. Only difference is that we got caught.
Point 3 isn't illegal. You can bid as many times as you want. The club can just keep saying no (which in the case of Keita they have done). Sometimes a club is saying no only to take a higher fee, how can you know? If they sell Keita then we know it was just all about getting as much money as possible.
Of course I know that, I just think it'll be funny in a kinda tragic way if Coutinho now tries to fuck us over.Yes. That Is a valid tactic that every club does when bidding. No doesn't always mean no as we know. You surely know all this and are just pissing around.
Well we haven't bid 70m yet have we? They must be getting encouragement from somewhere. Say we bid 70+m and they say yes? Doesn't that then mean it was all about getting the right price? You don't know unless you try.You know when it's right? When the club like for instance Roma say, OK we don't really want to sell but we would accept a bid of 35 mill.
Us n Leipzig:
56?
No. Hes not for sale.
60?
No! He's still not for sale.
65?
Fuck off! We are not selling him.
70?
FFS, no damn you.
Every player is for sale if you find a price that selling club will accept.
If Barca come in at 100m plus then you can be damn sure we'd sell.
If City bid 200m for Suarez Barca would sell etc etc.
You ask, how much do you want?Well we haven't bid 70m yet have we? They must be getting encouragement from somewhere. Say we bid 70+m and they say yes? Doesn't that then mean it was all about getting the right price? You don't know unless you try.
Karma doesn't exist. If it did clubs like Barca and Real Madrid would get fucked over every year. Look how barca went about getting fabregas. Parading him in a barca shirt while he was an arsenal player when wenger didn't want to let him go.
You ask, how much do you want?
Like we told Barca and Chelsea regarding Suarez and Torres.
So depending on the answer we got, we're either low balling them or they told us to fuck off or they're fucking around with us.Maybe we've done that with Leipzig.
Is engaging with Modoin this conversation:
a) futile
b) pointless
c) ridiculous; or
d) all of the above
LolIs engaging with Modo in this conversation:
a) futile
b) pointless
c) ridiculous; or
d) all of the above
We were almost punished for tapping up Van Dijk.
We also tried to tap up a Stoke youth player.
Now we keep bidding on a player that clearly isn't for sale.
I agree. As I said earlier, I'm sick & tired of selling our best players.That depends though. What is the point of getting 100 mill + if it sets us back a few season (once again). With the current prices and inflated fees I'm not holding my breath to how we would spend that 100 mill and improve without Coutinho. Who is probably our biggest star at the moment.
As Rurik has said, we should only sell Coutinho if we can get Mbappe. Which is unlikely, so no thanks.
If there is one season we're deffo shouldnt sell any of our top players its this summer.