[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42293.msg1199730#msg1199730 date=1287385080]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=42293.msg1199725#msg1199725 date=1287384292]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42293.msg1199723#msg1199723 date=1287383950]
people surely have to admit sacking a manager after 8 games sets a 'very' precedent because what happens if the poor run continues? what do you do then?
[/quote]
I'd be dead against changing for the sake of it, but it's not really the case, sometimes you have to make bold decisions to save a team. We're in crisis, there's no getting away from it. It's ok now when you win a game and move up four, five or six places. What happens as time goes on and you barely move up a place for getting a win? It's a quarter of the way through the season and he just has to go, we need to appoint someone like Kenny until the end of the season and hope for the best, and at this stage I really would take O'Neill too over Hodgson.
[/quote]
one of the reasons a stated for not sacking rafa was it would start a revolving door of managers, I seriously, seriously hope I'm wrong about that.
if NESV were asking me for my advice (ha ha) I would tell them to sack roy (NOW) install kenny and give him the simple brief of keeping us up, then sound out a new hungry manager with progressive ideas who can bring down the average age of the sqaud, improve the footbll and work in tandem with their ideas that brought red sox back to the top. by roy's own admission he is too set in his ways.
that basically rules out the likes of MON and managers of vast experience, our brief should be long term with us treading water in the short term. how long did it take kilinsman and loew to change the entire landscape of german football?
[/quote]
It's different at International level though because you have limited training/game time with your squad, so it was something that was exercised over a good few years, it'd be a different case with a club side. Whether that makes him more of a candidate for a 'Director of Football' role is the big question. But yeah, we need to look at the bigger picture, particularly financially and I think we to take some aspects of what the likes of Arsenal have done.
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=42293.msg1199725#msg1199725 date=1287384292]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42293.msg1199723#msg1199723 date=1287383950]
people surely have to admit sacking a manager after 8 games sets a 'very' precedent because what happens if the poor run continues? what do you do then?
[/quote]
I'd be dead against changing for the sake of it, but it's not really the case, sometimes you have to make bold decisions to save a team. We're in crisis, there's no getting away from it. It's ok now when you win a game and move up four, five or six places. What happens as time goes on and you barely move up a place for getting a win? It's a quarter of the way through the season and he just has to go, we need to appoint someone like Kenny until the end of the season and hope for the best, and at this stage I really would take O'Neill too over Hodgson.
[/quote]
one of the reasons a stated for not sacking rafa was it would start a revolving door of managers, I seriously, seriously hope I'm wrong about that.
if NESV were asking me for my advice (ha ha) I would tell them to sack roy (NOW) install kenny and give him the simple brief of keeping us up, then sound out a new hungry manager with progressive ideas who can bring down the average age of the sqaud, improve the footbll and work in tandem with their ideas that brought red sox back to the top. by roy's own admission he is too set in his ways.
that basically rules out the likes of MON and managers of vast experience, our brief should be long term with us treading water in the short term. how long did it take kilinsman and loew to change the entire landscape of german football?
[/quote]
It's different at International level though because you have limited training/game time with your squad, so it was something that was exercised over a good few years, it'd be a different case with a club side. Whether that makes him more of a candidate for a 'Director of Football' role is the big question. But yeah, we need to look at the bigger picture, particularly financially and I think we to take some aspects of what the likes of Arsenal have done.