Poll How long should he have?

[spider-Neil]

I pride myself on patience and giving the manager time, but roy doesn't derserve it. he's clueless and should be removed before it's too late. the 'daglish' chant spoke volumes, it's only because liverpool fans have a bit more class that they didn't chant 'you don't know what you're doing!'

 

[manwithnoname]

Yeah, I said the 'Dalglish' chant would be out in force before too long

And we all know what it *really* means: fuck off Budgie, fuck off Pursssslow, fuck off part-time Chelsea Chairman.

*now*

 

[mark1975]

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=42112.msg1187945#msg1187945 date=1286176893]
I pride myself on patience and giving the manager time, but roy doesn't derserve it. he's clueless and should be removed before it's too late. the 'daglish' chant spoke volumes, it's only because liverpool fans have a bit more class that they didn't chant 'you don't know what you're doing!'
[/quote]

Eh?? Whereas chanting for an ex-manager is classy?

We all know it's what the fans what, it's what most of us want anyway, but it wasn't good regardless of how shite Hodgson has been. Applauding Blackpool off the pitch was 'classy'.

 

[the_khl]

I really don't think a change of manager would mean a whole lot at this point, why would it? Still give him untill Christmas and if we're still moving around like headless chickens on the pitch then get rid.

The thing is a new manager would be given what? The traditional minus £5M-£10M to spend? First he'll have to cash in on a star player that wants out and THEN he can buy someone half as good but that he's got some beliefs in.

Fact of the matter is a new manager won't change a thing untill the ownership-issue is sorted.

You can't build a new henge without any stone.

 

[manwithnoname]

[quote author=KHL link=topic=42112.msg1188074#msg1188074 date=1286188597]
I really don't think a change of manager would mean a whole lot at this point, why would it? Still give him untill Christmas and if we're still moving around like headless chickens on the pitch then get rid.

The thing is a new manager would be given what? The traditional minus £5M-£10M to spend? First he'll have to cash in on a star player that wants out and THEN he can buy someone half as good but that he's got some beliefs in.

Fact of the matter is a new manager won't change a thing untill the ownership-issue is sorted.

You can't build a new henge without any stone.
[/quote]

Well, the first thing the new manager will do is ship out the likes of Lucas, and his Cunt Twin, who is looking every inch like he will live up to my billing as The Worst Holding Midfielder In The World.

That's £10m already, and the team will be improved simply by them not being there.

 

[the_khl]

[quote author=Brendan link=topic=42112.msg1188076#msg1188076 date=1286188759]
[quote author=KHL link=topic=42112.msg1188074#msg1188074 date=1286188597]
I really don't think a change of manager would mean a whole lot at this point, why would it? Still give him untill Christmas and if we're still moving around like headless chickens on the pitch then get rid.

The thing is a new manager would be given what? The traditional minus £5M-£10M to spend? First he'll have to cash in on a star player that wants out and THEN he can buy someone half as good but that he's got some beliefs in.

Fact of the matter is a new manager won't change a thing untill the ownership-issue is sorted.

You can't build a new henge without any stone.
[/quote]

Well, the first thing the new manager will do is ship out the likes of Lucas, and his Cunt Twin, who is looking every inch like he will live up to my billing as The Worst Holding Midfielder In The World.

That's £10m already, and the team will be improved simply by them not being there.
[/quote]
Because it's that simple?

Lucas didn't even play for a minute in our last game as you prpbably know so how can it be his fault? Poulsen didn't play well once again but it's not like he was 1) guilty for any of their goals nor 2) missing our chances in the other end of the pitch. Actually how odd it seemed at the time we somehow looked less dangerous after he was subbed which had more to do with formation and rotation than everything else but still he didn't look like the sole disease outthere.

Poulsen has looked crap agreed but so has most of our players bar Gerrard and what's worse they've all looked completely derived for confidence of late. Roy has got his part of the blame beeing the manager but there's so many outside factors influencing as well.

The current climate of the club are extremely damaging and is obviously taking it's toll on anyone from players to managers to fans.